You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Former DOJ Officials Ask for Inquiry Into Trump Interference in AT&T-Time Warner Case

UPDATED WASHINGTON — Nearly a dozen former Justice Department officials want the federal judge to allow an inquiry into potential White House interference in the government’s decision to try to block AT&T’s proposed merger with Time Warner, given President Donald Trump’s professed disdain for the deal and CNN.

The group of Justice Department veterans, including former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara and President Richard Nixon’s White House counsel John Dean, filed an amicus brief late on Thursday in which they said they were “concerned that the president and the White House may have interfered in this matter.”

They requested “that the court ensure that the parties are able to examine this issue — and if necessary, the court provide redress — so that the public retains confidence that the Department is fulfilling its mission of ensuring the fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans.”

The Justice Department’s antitrust lawsuit against AT&T and Time Warner, filed in November, is set to go to trial on March 19.

The department’s Antitrust Division chief, Makan Delrahim, has denied that the White House influenced the decision to sue. A spokeswoman for the division declined comment.

When the DOJ-AT&T lawsuit was filed, White House spokesman Raj Shah said, “The president did not speak with the Attorney General about this matter, and no White House official was authorized to speak with the Department of Justice on this matter.”

AT&T-Time Warner, led by attorney Dan Petrocelli, last month sought access to “privilege logs,” or records e-mails and oral communications that they believe could shed light on the extent to which the White House was involved. Judge Richard Leon denied the request.

But the former Justice Department officials, in a filing organized by the Protect Democracy Project, argued that even the appearance of White House influence in the matter was a concern, writing that “the mere appearance of vindictiveness is constitutionally problematic.”

They said AT&T-Time Warner’s legal team could make a “prima facie” showing  “that the present action was brought with improper motive to retaliate against CNN.”

“The president repeatedly has declared his enmity for CNN and, as a result, declared that his administration would block the merger,” they wrote. “Those voluntary statements regarding the merger and expressing disagreement with CNN because of the content of its reporting should open the door to discovery to help determine whether the president’s political self-interest and potentially unconstitutional bias have infected the handling of this matter.”

They wrote that “if that limited discovery reveals White House communications or influence on this matter, then the Court should permit fuller discovery and inquiry into the issue at trial.”

“The gold standard for doing so would be proving that DOJ was already arriving at its position on this merger before any interference by the White House,” they wrote.

They also talked of potential remedies — depending on what is found. One would be to require that the Justice Department reconsider the case with a new team “that is more insulated from White House interference.”

One potential approach would be to require DOJ to reconsider this case with a new team that is more insulated from White House interference, or if the court finds “unlawful interference,” it could dismiss the lawsuit.

Others signing the amicus brief included a number of Justice Department officials who served during the Obama administration, as well as John McKay, who was U.S. Attorney for the western district of Washington from 2001 to 2007, during the administration of President George W. Bush.

Their brief is here.

Earlier this week, Project Democracy filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, seeking documents of any contact between the White House and the Justice Department related to the proposed merger of The Walt Disney Co. with much of 21st Century Fox. That deal was announced on Dec. 20.

Update: The Justice Department has filed a response.

“Given this court’s opinion on this issue, the proposed amicus curiae does not appear meaningfully to add to unresolved issues in the upcoming trial in the current case,” wrote Eric Welsh and Lawrence Reicher of the Antitrust Division.

“Finally, the United States notes the imminent trial and the court’s discretion as to whether movant’s brief and positions therein are ‘desirable,’ ‘relevant’ and ‘not adequately represented by a party.'”

More Politics

  • Donald Trump

    Twitter Explains What It Would Take for Trump’s Account or Tweets to Be Deleted

    Twitter grants special exemptions to Donald Trump and other “world leaders” from its code of conduct, including from rules that apply to everyone else. But the social network — which is Trump’s go-to megaphone — says nobody is “above our policies entirely.” Critics including presidential contender Sen. Kamala Harris have blasted Twitter for failing to [...]

  • Tulsi Gabbard, Tom Steyer, Cory Booker,

    Democrats Debate: Elizabeth Warren Calls for Breakup of Tech Companies

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren called for the breakup of big tech companies on Tuesday night, as the candidates debated the size and influence of the technology sector in society. “I’m not willing to give up and let a handful of monopolists dominate our economy and our democracy,” Warren said, citing Amazon as a company that controls [...]

  • Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren,

    Democratic Debate: Elizabeth Warren Takes Fire From Moderates

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren came under fire from her more moderate opponents in Tuesday night’s Democratic debate, who challenged her plan for “Medicare for all” and her wealth tax proposal. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, and former Rep. Beto O’Rourke took on Warren more forcefully than they have in previous debates. Buttigieg called her out [...]

  • Elizabeth Warren

    Elizabeth Warren's Fundraising Approach Worries Some Donors

    Elizabeth Warren raised nearly $25 million last quarter, and she did it without ever once setting foot in a fancy living room in Bel Air or Brentwood. Last week, she announced that if she is the Democratic nominee, she will continue to avoid high-dollar fundraisers in the general election. And on Tuesday, she went further, [...]

  • LeBron James

    LeBron James Wades Into NBA Controversy Even as China Resumes Streaming Games

    Basketball superstar LeBron James has added fuel to the fire of the controversy engulfing the NBA over its self-censorship in line with China’s political interests — just as China appeared poised to quietly move toward defusing the issue with a resumption of online streaming for most games after a ban last week. James was criticized Tuesday for appearing to toe Beijing’s [...]

  • Hunter Biden

    Hunter Biden Says He Made No 'Ethical Lapse' in Emotional ABC News Interview

    In an interview that prompted tears, Hunter Biden sat down with ABC News’ Amy Robach, stating that he made no “ethical lapse” by sitting on the board of a Ukrainian gas company, and rejected President Donald Trump’s notion that he and his father, former Vice President Joe Biden, have engaged in any wrongdoing. “I don’t [...]

  • Donald Trump Hollywood Racism

    White House Says Trump 'Strongly Condemns' Violent Anti-Media Video

    President Donald Trump hasn’t yet watched a violent parody video in which he’s depicted killing figures representing media outlets and his political rivals, but the White House says he “strongly condemns” it. “Re: the video played over the weekend: The @POTUS @realDonaldTrump has not yet seen the video, he will see it shortly, but based [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content