You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

AT&T-Time Warner Trial: Expert Witness Blasts DOJ Claims of Merger Harms

UPDATED WASHINGTON — An expert witness for AT&T-Time Warner spent much of Thursday blasting the methodology behind the government’s claims of the merger’s harm to consumers, even concluding that “on average prices will go down.”

Dennis Carlton, a professor at the University of Chicago, refuted claims made just a day earlier by Carl Shapiro, the government’s economic expert and a professor at University of California at Berkeley, and gave his own analysis of the effects of the merger.

“The evidence does not support the government’s claim, Shapiro’s claim, that this will harm consumers,” Carlton testified.

The Justice Department is suing to block the $85 billion merger, claiming that it would give AT&T-Time Warner increased leverage that will allow it to extract higher carriage rates for networks like CNN, TBS, and TNT from rivals to AT&T. That would ultimately lead to higher prices for consumers.

Shapiro on Wednesday produced the results of his study, based on economic modeling of the merger’s impact, that showed that the transaction would raise prices on pay-TV consumers by $571 million by 2021.

But Carlton said that Shapiro failed to take into account a number of factors, including what happened after past recent vertical mergers, such as the Comcast-NBCUniversal union in 2011. “Ignoring that evidence is a big mistake,” Carlton said. One of the graphs in his study showed NBCUniversal’s program carriage fees from distributors rising less quickly than the industry overall.

Carlton at one point called Shapiro’s method, based in part on a bargaining model created by John Nash, “theoretically unsound.” At one point, when he talked about the complicated nature of Shapiro’s study, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon said that it was like a “Rube Goldberg contraption.”

He said that Shapiro’s conclusion that AT&T-Time Warner would gain increased leverage in carriage negotiations depended too heavily on the threat of a blackout of Time Warner’s Turner networks. Turner has offered AT&T’s rivals to go into arbitration in carriage disputes should the merger be approved, but Carlton said that Shapiro’s figures did not take that into account.

He also challenged some figures that Shapiro used in his study, like a a 9% rate of long-term subscriber loss should a distributor lose Turner’s content. Carlton said that number was too high. He said that Shapiro’s predictions underestimate the number of those pay-TV subscribers who choose to “cut the cord,” or give up traditional cable or satellite service.

He acknowledged that studies on merger effects cannot be precise, but said that should be something to be considered when looking at Shapiro’s data. He said it would be a “real mistake” to stop a merger “because I am predicting a tiny price increase.”

The Justice Department’s lead attorney, Craig Conrath, tried to show how Carlton failed to account for certain factors in his own study. Conrath pointed to an array of conditions placed on the Comcast-NBCUniversal deal, including those requiring arbitration and another prohibiting retaliation, that could have limited the company’s ability to extract price increases from rivals.

He also noted that Carlton’s study was in some cases out of date — the new internet streaming service YouTube TV, for instance, now carries Turner’s networks, a fact that the Justice Department shows that those channels are “must have” content for all types of multichannel distributors.

Conrath and Carlton had a few tense exchanges, as the Justice Department attorney questioned some of the data that Carlton used. One of their longest exchanges was over a “lifetime value” figure that Carlton used in one of his calculations. In his questioning, Conrath suggested that Carlton had selectively picked a a number that would ultimately show that the merger posed less of an economic harm. Carlton insisted that it was selected because it was  the most recent data available.

Like the day before, Thursday was a long day of proceedings spent on examining figures — some simple, others rather arcane.

At certain points, attorneys on both sides addressed Carlton as “Mr. Shapiro,” drawing laughs in the courtroom and a certain recognition of the complicated nature of the testimony. After he finished and walked out of the courtroom, Carlton shook hands with attorneys on both sides, an acknowledgement of the marathon session. Makan Delrahim, the DOJ’s antitrust chief, who sat during the day with the government’s legal team, also shook hands with the defense witness and gave him a friendly tap on the back.

Popular on Variety

More Politics

  • President Donald Trump waves as he

    Trump Holds Fundraiser in Hollywood's Backyard

    President Trump paid a visit to Los Angeles on Tuesday, as part of a West Coast fundraising swing expected to raise $15 million. Trump is set to appear at a dinner at developer Geoffrey Palmer’s house in Beverly Hills, where tickets range from $1,000 to $100,000 for VIPs. Though set in Hollywood’s backyard, the event [...]

  • Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Burning Image Debate Ad

    ABC Runs Debate Ad Showing Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Burning Image

    ABC aired an ad during Thursday’s Democratic debate that depicted a burning image of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and likened her politics to those that caused the Cambodian genocide. New Faces GOP funded the ad, which features Elizabeth Heng, a Republican who lost a bid for a Fresno-area congressional seat last year. Ocasio-Cortez responded on Twitter, [...]

  • Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris.

    ABC News' Democratic Debate Lacked Energy and Purpose

    At long last, former Vice President Joe Biden and Senator Elizabeth Warren were on the same stage. And the result was a long and fairly dull evening. After two Democratic Party debate stages in which the field of candidates had been bifurcated — splitting, in both cases, the perceived frontrunners from the establishment and insurgent [...]

  • Former Vice President Joe Biden responds

    Protesters Interrupt Joe Biden During Democratic Debate

    Protesters interrupted presidential candidate Joe Biden during Thursday’s democratic debate. The chants came nearly two and a half hours in as moderator George Stephanopoulos asked the former vice president about any professional setbacks he’s faced and how he recovered from them. “We’re going to clear the protesters,” Stephanopoulos said as the chants began. “We’re sorry.” [...]

  • Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren,

    Dems Debate in Houston: Moderates Push Back on Medicare for All

    The third Democratic debate on Thursday was billed as the first showdown between the top contenders: Vice President Joe Biden, Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Sen. Bernie Sanders. Biden did challenge the liberal senators on health care early in the debate, which was broadcast on ABC. He asked repeatedly how they would pay for their multi-trillion [...]

  • Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth WarrenSecond 2020

    How to Watch the Third Democratic Primary Debate

    The leading Democratic candidates will once again go head to head tonight in Houston, Tex. for the party’s third debate ahead of the primaries. The anticipated debate, which will include the 10 Democratic candidates currently leading in the polls, will kick off at 8 p.m. ET and will broadcast live on ABC and Univision. ABC [...]

  • Gen Z Climate Activism

    How Generation Z Is Embracing Bold Action in the Face of Climate Crisis

    Of all the dire forecasts she’s heard about the climate crisis, there is one that Arielle Martinez Cohen can’t get out of her mind. The report, from an Australian think tank, projected that if nothing is done, civilization could collapse by 2050. “I will be 49 in that year,” says the 17-year-old activist. “It makes [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content