You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

AT&T-Time Warner: Trial ‘Confirmed’ They Were Singled Out for Antitrust Case

Attorneys for AT&T and Time Warner said in a court filing on Thursday that the evidence presented by the government in the antitrust trial showed that they were the victims of differential treatment from other vertical transactions.

The comment was made in a footnote to the AT&T-Time Warner trial brief, in which the companies dismissed the government’s case as falling far short of proving that the transaction posed competitive harm. The companies did not pursue a “selective enforcement” defense in the six-week trial, after U.S. District Judge Richard Leon refused their pre-trial request to obtain records of communication between the White House and the Justice Department.

“Defendants have not abandoned their selective enforcement defense,” the companies said in a footnote. “Trial evidence confirmed the government’s differential treatment of comparable vertical mergers. But absent discovery, it was impractical for defendants to press the issue further at trial.”

AT&T-Time Warner’s lead attorney Daniel Petrocelli had sought a privilege log of DOJ-Trump administration communications, ostensibly to pursue a potential defense that the effort to block the merger was influenced by President Trump’s animus toward CNN, a division of Time Warner-owned Turner. But Leon wrote in February that AT&T had not shown evidence of so-called “selective enforcement” to warrant obtaining the information and had fallen “far short” of showing that they were singled out.

The Justice Department claims that the combined companies will use increased leverage to extract greater carriage fees for CNN, TBS, TNT and other Turner networks from AT&T’s rivals. Ultimately, those increased costs would be passed on to consumers.

In the trial brief, the companies said that “this is not a close case,” and that in fact the trial showed that consumers would face lower prices, and the merged company would be better able to compete with internet giants like Facebook and Google. “The only appropriate judgment is one that finds no legal violation, denies the requested injunction, and brings the case to a prompt conclusion.”

AT&T-Time Warner’s legal team also argues that Leon cannot impose remedies, or a set of conditions, on the proposed merger, without concluding that it poses anticompetitive harm.

They keyed in on a moment from Monday’s closing arguments, when Leon asked the Justice Department’s lead counsel, Craig Conrath, whether he first had to find an antitrust violation before imposing a remedy. Conrath agreed that was the case.

That’s potentially significant, as earlier in the trial Leon had queried one witness as to whether he would be amenable to a merger that included a modified arbitration provision.

Shortly after the case was filed in November, Time Warner’s Turner networks offered to go into “baseball” style arbitration to settle carriage disputes with AT&T’s rivals. The offer was a way to alleviate concerns that the combined company would gain too much leverage among cable, satellite and other distributors. If the clause were involved, Turner could not pull its networks during the carriage dispute, eliminating the threat of a blackout.

AT&T-Time Warner’s legal team argues that the arbitration provision should not be treated as a “remedy,” but a “commitment.” They say that Leon could “issue findings and conclusions about the commitment that will confirm the rights and obligations it entails.”

They said that the Justice Department failed to take the arbitration clause into account in assessing the merger, and their “conscious refusal to do so was a fundamental failure of proof on liability issues and should be treated as such.”

Leon was the same judge who signed off on Comcast-NBCUniversal’s merger in 2011, which included a host of conditions, but AT&T-Time Warner’s legal team said that this case is different.

“The Tunney Act, which applies only to DOJ antitrust settlements, required this court to confirm that DOJ had not granted Comcast an inappropriately lenient deal and that the settlement was ‘in the public interest,'” the companies said in their trial brief. “This case involves no such statutory mandate. This is a fully litigated case, and the government failed to prove” a violation of antitrust law.

(Pictured: Daniel Petrocelli)

POPULAR ON VARIETY:

More Politics

  • Pete Buttigieg

    Here's Who's Raising Money in Hollywood for Pete Buttigieg

    The Pete Buttigieg campaign released its top bundlers on Friday evening, as it continues to open up its fundraising process to media scrutiny. Buttigieg released the names of 157 members of his “investors circle,” each of whom has raised at least $25,000 for his campaign. Buttigieg is now the most prolific fundraiser in Hollywood, with [...]

  • Ivanka Trump

    Ivanka Trump Reportedly Set to Speak at CES 2020

    Ivanka Trump, President Donald Trump’s daughter and an adviser to the president, is scheduled to appear on a panel at CES 2020 in January, according to a published report. Ivanka Trump will appear on a panel set for Jan. 8 at 3 p.m. at the Las Vegas confab with Gary Shapiro, president and CEO of [...]

  • Donald Trump Hollywood Racism

    House Judiciary Committee Votes to Impeach President Trump

    The House Judiciary Committee voted to adopt two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Friday morning, sending the matter to the full House for a vote next week. The articles accuse Trump of abusing his power by pressuring Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election and of obstructing the impeachment inquiry. Both articles [...]

  • Boris JohnsonConservative Party rally on eve

    Boris Johnson Returns as Prime Minister After Election, Pledges to Deliver Brexit

    UPDATED: The third general election in Britain in four years has returned former London mayor Boris Johnson as prime minister and given his Conservative Party a commanding majority in Parliament. Johnson campaigned on a promise to finally pull the U.K. out of the European Union after three-and-a-half years of political infighting since Britons voted to [...]

  • Boris Epshteyn

    Sinclair Drops Political Commentary Segments From Boris Epshteyn, Ameshia Cross

    Sinclair Broadcast Group has decided to scrap the political commentary segments that have aired across its vast station group since 2017. Boris Epshteyn, former Trump campaign official turned chief political analyst for Sinclair, has been delivering commentary segments that were mandated to run adjacent to local newscasts on all Sinclair stations since the spring of [...]

  • From left House Speaker Nancy Pelosi,

    House Leadership Unveils Impeachment Articles Against President Trump

    House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning, accusing him of abusing his power and obstructing Congress in its impeachment inquiry. Two committee chairmen — Jerrold Nadler and Adam Schiff — laid out a case that Trump interfered in the 2020 election by pressuring Ukraine to announce an investigation [...]

  • Pete Buttigieg

    Pete Buttigieg to Open Fundraisers to the Press

    Pete Buttigieg will open his fundraisers to the press and will release names of his bundlers within a week, the campaign announced on Monday. Buttigieg made the commitments three after Sen. Elizabeth Warren challenged him to be more transparent about his fundraising. “From the start, Pete has said it is important for every candidate to [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content