×
You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Judges Question DOJ’s Arguments in Appeal of AT&T Antitrust Decision

WASHINGTON — AT&T’s merger with Time Warner faced a new round of judicial scrutiny on Thursday as a three-judge panel weighed whether there were clear errors in a district court decision that cleared the way for the transaction.

The panel — Judith Rogers, a Clinton appointee; Robert L. Wilkins, an Obama appointee; and David Sentelle, a Reagan appointee — gave little clear indication of which way they were leaning.

But they did ask a number of skeptical questions to the Justice Department’s attorney, Michael Murray, and pressed him on just where the government can show that the lower court erred in its decision.

In June, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon’s 172-page decision ruled in favor of AT&T, and rejected all of the government’s arguments.

The Justice Department claims Leon ignored the “economics of bargaining,” and that he “illogically and erroneously concluded” that the merger would not give Time Warner, now known as WarnerMedia, more leverage. The government contends that the merger will allow WarnerMedia to extract higher prices for Turner content from distribution rivals, and that AT&T-owned DirecTV would ultimately benefit.

Murray argued that Leon was inconsistent in that he accepted that, before the merger, Time Warner’s leverage came from the threat of a blackout. But in examining the post-merger landscape, Leon didn’t weigh the threat of a blackout but whether one was even possible.

Popular on Variety

Sentelle, though, said the government had to do more than prove economic theory but “show that there is going to be harm to competition that is substantial.”

Much of the hearing, which lasted nearly two hours, was devoted to the merits of a model used by economist Carl Shapiro, that was presented during the six-week trial. The model showed that the merger would lead to an increase in consumer prices, but Leon found fault with the inputs that were used to calculate those figures.

AT&T’s attorney, Peter Keisler, several times noted that one of the “input” figures used in the calculation was changed, and ultimately made the merger’s consumer harm greater. The source of the figure, he said, was a consultant working for Charter Communications, who emailed one of the inputs while standing in an airport boarding line.

After he was retained by the government, Shapiro relied on the figures in his model, but was unaware of the changes that were made to the inputs, he said.

He said that the government’s case “absolutely fell apart” in the presentation of the model.

Murray, however, said AT&T’s focus on the inputs used was “a lot of smoke,” and that the figure was supported by a separate, sealed study from Comcast.

He also said the government’s case can be proven without quantifying the merger’s harms, something that courts have accepted in past precedent.

In November, 2017, just days after the Justice Department sued to block the merger, Time Warner offered to go into baseball-style arbitration with AT&T’s rivals that included a promise not to blackout Turner programming during carriage negotiations.

The judges asked whether they can ignore the fact that such an offer was made, as it would have an impact on bargaining leverage.

Wilkins told the DOJ’s lawyer that “you are saying that the district court erred because in the post-merger world, the efficacy of the [blackout] threat hasn’t changed.”

“How can we just ignore [the arbitration offer] and say that the district court has irrationally switched positions?”

Murray said that a number of AT&T’s distribution rivals testified that they rejected the offer.

Rogers pressed Keisler on whether the company would honor the arbitration offer, noting that in Leon’s opinion, “all we have is a footnote and a finding that AT&T won’t walk away.”

“We don’t make an offer in the marketplace and say, ‘We had our fingers crossed and won’t honor it,’ Keisler said.

“Well, we will take you at your offer,” Rogers responded.

Kaiser was interrupted by the judges questions far fewer times than the government’s attorney.

Also giving arguments were attorneys for two separate groups of antitrust scholars, who filed amicus briefs in the case in support of separate sides.

AT&T’s attorney did face some questions about an antitrust precedent, advanced in the Supreme Court decision in Copperweld Vs. Independence Tube Corp., that all units of a company will act to maximize the profits of the corporate parent. Wilkins noted that Leon did not cite that 1984 decision once in his opinion.

Keisler, however, said that Leon still embraced that principle, even if there is disagreement as to how a corporation would seek maximize its profits. He said that past vertical mergers like AT&T-Time Warner showed that the corporate goal is to get content on as many platforms as possible, not to negotiate in a different way to extract more money from rivals.

At least publicly, AT&T executives haven’t been worried about the appeal. CEO Randall Stephenson said his team was spending “zero effort” thinking about it.

The DOJ and AT&T already made an agreement to keep Turner’s assets a separate unit until Feb. 28 in order to limit impact should the government prevail.

The judges did not say when they would rule, but a decision may not come for several months.

“We appreciate the Court’s attention to the arguments of counsel and look forward to receiving its decision,” an AT&T spokeswoman said.

Jeremy Edwards, a spokesman for the Antitrust Division, said, “The Department of Justice appreciates the court’s careful consideration of this important case, and will await the court’s decision.”

More Politics

  • Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi,

    Nancy Pelosi Announces House Will Proceed With Impeachment

    Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Thursday morning that the House will proceed with articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump. Pelosi said the impeachment inquiry has shown that Trump abused his power by withholding military aid and a White House meeting from Ukraine in an attempt to pressure the country’s president to announce an investigation into [...]

  • Kamala Harris

    Kamala Harris Drops Out of Presidential Race

    Kamala Harris announced on Tuesday that she is dropping out of the presidential race, citing her campaign’s struggles to raise money in the closing months before the Iowa caucus. Harris informed her staff on a conference call that she was suspending her campaign. “My campaign for president simply doesn’t have the financial resources we need [...]

  • Prince Andrew161st Great Yorkshire Show, Great

    Woman Trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein Accuses Britain's Prince Andrew of Lying

    The woman who alleges that she was forced by Jeffrey Epstein to have sex with Prince Andrew said she had three encounters with the British royal at the late financier’s instigation and accused the prince of lying about it. Virginia Giuffre told the BBC that Epstein brought her to London in March 2001 when she [...]

  • Armed police at incident at London

    Two Dead in Terrorist Attack on London Bridge

    UPDATED: Several people were injured, some seriously, in a knife attack in London and their suspected assailant was killed by police in an incident Friday that Scotland Yard said was a terrorist assault. London police later said that two people were killed, according to the Associated Press. London Bridge was cordoned off and the area [...]

  • Donald Trump Hollywood Racism

    Trump Tweets Doctored Photo of Himself With Rocky Balboa's Body

    With a little Photoshop, anyone can have the Eye of the Tiger — or the shirtless body. On Wednesday, President Donald Trump had the internet scratching its collective head when he tweeted an image of his face superimposed on top of the fictional Rocky Balboa’s body. While the doctored image had no caption, it does [...]

  • Michael Bloomberg Democratic National Convention

    Michael Bloomberg Officially Enters Presidential Race

    Former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg announced Sunday that he would enter the Democratic Primary “to defeat Donald Trump” and “rebuild America.” I’m running for president to defeat Donald Trump and rebuild America. I believe my unique set of experiences in business, government, and philanthropy will enable me to win and lead. Join our team: [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content