×
You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

The Brilliance of ‘Black Panther’ Helped It Avoid a Common Tentpole Movie Trap

The outpouring of reactions to Ryan Coogler’s Marvel triumph “Black Panther” is understandable, given that there are any number of things to praise about it. Its world-building is spectacular (I need Shuri, Okoye, and Nakia spinoffs now); it disproves the frustrating, long-held myth that movies starring actors of color don’t perform well all over the world; it is the rare superhero film with an array of well-developed female characters (Angela Bassett as Queen Ramonda — just wow); and it is one of the most explicitly political tentpole movies ever (and brilliantly so).

It also had one of the best concluding sequences I’ve ever seen in a superhero film. Among its many accomplishments, “Black Panther” understands that psychological stakes matter more than the sheer scale of destruction on screen.

Coogler’s film managed to avoid what I’ve taken to calling the “smashy-smashy” trap — the syndrome that afflicts too many big-budget movies, even some that I otherwise like. In most of these movies, the final 30 minutes consist of escalating smashy-smashy, as the audience is pummeled by ever more ridiculous spurts of rote violence and flames shoot out of just about everything in sight. When a big-budget movie does this, I tend to tune out, just when, theoretically, I’m supposed to care most.

To be clear, when it comes to all the fighting, blood and destruction, my complaint is not about the violence itself — I actually love well-deployed action and mayhem. I’m just bored by how predictable these concluding scenes usually are. Nine times out of ten, a square-jawed hero faces down a powerful bad guy who wants to:

a. destroy a city and/or a whole bunch of human beings we haven’t met (or barely know)

b. destroy Earth

c. destroy the Galaxy

d. something something Infinity Stone

e. all of the above

Can you recall the concluding action sequences in “Thor 2,” “Man of Steel,” or “X Men: The Last Stand”? Probably not all that well — and if you remember them, do you recall feeling anything at the end of those films? It’s unlikely.

Of course, those films had other problems that no explosive-laden third act was going to fix (ahem, “Star Wars” prequels). But death and destruction have been the go-to solutions for too many tentpoles films: If the character development, world-building, and depth are lacking, and you’ve got no way to hide that in the home stretch, just blow s—- up! Create ever-bigger armies of aliens or robots, and take out a few dozen city blocks or planets while you’re at it. That ought to distract the audience.

It can work, up to a point. But an increasing number of us would rather stay home and binge on our favorite TV shows — or watch “Wonder Woman” or “Iron Man” again on our TVs — than hand over our hard-earned money to sit through character journeys that acquire no texture or stories that have not been made relevant in some way — emotionally, psychologically, politically. Explosions and ever-growing armies of CGI monsters can’t make up for the feeling of frantic, empty bloat that accompanies the endings of too many big-budget films. I’d rather watch “Black Lightning” or “Jessica Jones,” thanks.

There are signs that the filmmakers behind big franchises are beginning to shy away from the excesses of smashy-smashy. “Logan” wrapped itself deeply in a thorny, bittersweet journey of redemption. “Rogue One” and “Star Wars: The Last Jedi” weren’t stingy with explosions, but the deaths of important characters had tragic and elegaic resonance. The “Guardians of the Galaxy” films may indulge in a certain amount of bonkers violence and CGI overkill, but they also provide witty asides, an adorable sentient tree and a foul-mouthed raccoon I would follow into hell.

One reason “Wonder Woman” — which did conform to the formula by featuring a final sequence full of the usual explosions — worked as well as it did was because we understood the cost of both Diana and Steve’s actions. It wasn’t just that the world was at risk — their emotional investments, their beliefs, and their friends were, too. What they did and what they felt in those moments mattered.

And that’s where the brilliance of “Black Panther” comes in. 

[WARNING: “Black Panther” spoilers follow.]

By the time the concluding battle rolled around, I cared about every single core character on that battlefield. Seeing Okoye fight for her rightful king with fury and precision was thrilling. Shuri, the film’s breakout character, showed that she wasn’t just a whiz in the lab — she could engage in high-tech fisticuffs with the best of them.

Nakia was yet another charismatic woman on that field of battle (and if Marvel doesn’t make her the centerpiece of a whole string of her own action-espionage films, it’s leaving a lot of money on the table). It was exciting when M’Baku’s army arrived from the wintry mountains, and I laughed with pure delight when one of W’Kabi’s thundering battle rhinos licked Okoye’s face. A battle sequence that takes time to deftly insert a humorous moment — one that doesn’t undercut but reinforces the humanity of the combatants — is a thing of beauty.

And I may have had my doubts about Erik Killmonger’s methods, but his goal — to have Wakanda help free oppressed people of color all over the world — was not trivial, nor is it one that Killmonger, a son of Wakanda himself, arrived at lightly. Killmonger’s death was meaningful to T’Challa and spoke deeply to the film’s themes of liberation, autonomy, and frustration, and their exciting fight was followed by that graceful and compassionate death scene.

In “Black Panther,” the stakes mattered all the way through the film, but especially at the end — to the characters, and to me. That’s how these movies are supposed to work.

It wasn’t about the size of the battlefield, the fate of the entire cosmos or the villain’s faintly ridiculous agenda. These men and women were battling each other to save and defend their world. The beliefs and loyalties they acted on were compelling, thoughtfully presented and made sense. Thanks to top-notch performances, writing, and direction, what the characters were fighting about on that golden plain drew me deeper into Wakanda.

And I can’t wait to visit again.

More Film

  • Nicolas Cage

    Film News Roundup: Nicolas Cage's 'Jiu Jitsu' Obtains Cyprus Support

    In today’s film news roundup, Cyprus is backing Nicolas Cage’s “Jiu Jitsu”; “The Nanny” and “Amityville 1974” are moving forward; “Milk” is returning to theaters; and Garrett Hedlund’s “Burden” is getting distribution. CYPRUS REBATE Nicolas Cage’s “Jiu Jitsu” has become the first international film to use Cyprus’ new tax credit-rebate program by filming entirely in [...]

  • Zhao Tao

    Zhao Tao Gets Candid in Kering's Shanghai Women in Motion Showcase Interview

    Zhao Tao is one of the most recognizable faces in Chinese art cinema thanks to her longtime collaboration with director Jia Zhangke, whom she married in 2012. From 2000’s “Platform” to last year’s “Ash is Purest White,” her work has plumbed the moral depths of modern China and brought stories of the country’s drastic change [...]

  • Skyline on the Huangpu River with

    Chinese-American Film Festival Seeks Particular Dialog

    With U.S.-China ties at an ever-sinking low, the Chinese-American Film and TV Festival on Tuesday pledged to improve communications between the two countries —  at a Chinese language-only press conference Tuesday that had few foreigners present. Most attendees who took to the stage to give congratulatory speeches that seemed more intent on heaping praise upon [...]

  • Murder Mystery

    Netflix Reveals Record-Breaking Stats for Sandler-Aniston 'Murder Mystery' Flick

    “Murder Mystery,” the latest Adam Sandler film to debut on Netflix, broke viewing records on the streaming service, the company revealed Tuesday. The film, which is co-headlined by Jennifer Aniston, was seen by close to 30.9 million households in its first 3 days, according to a tweet sent out Tuesday afternoon. 🚨ADAM SANDLER AND JENNIFER [...]

  • Agents Accuse Writers Guild of Refusing

    Writers Guild 'Plans to Respond' to Agents' Proposal as Frustration Mounts

    In a sign of increasing frustration, Hollywood agents have accused the Writers Guild of America of foot-dragging in the bitter two-month dispute. “It has become clear as more days pass that the Guild is not interested in making a deal,” said the negotiating committee for the agents in statement issued Tuesday. “Over the past year, [...]

  • Jermaine Fowler arrives at the 69th

    Jermaine Fowler to Co-Star With Eddie Murphy in 'Coming 2 America' (EXCLUSIVE)

    Jermaine Fowler is set to play one of the leads opposite Eddie Murphy in Paramount’s sequel “Coming 2 America,” sources tell Variety. “Hustle & Flow” helmer Craig Brewer is on board to direct the pic with the studio planning an August 7, 2020 release. Plot details of “Coming 2 America” are unknown, as are the [...]

  • Henry Golding attends the Fragrance Foundation

    Henry Golding Starts Long House Shingle With 'Inheritance,' 'Harrington's Greatest Hits'

    “Crazy Rich Asians” star Henry Golding has started Long House Productions in partnership with China’s Starlight Cultural Entertainment Group with two features in the works. Golding’s first feature under the Long House banner is action adventure “The Inheritance,” based on an original story idea by Alistair Hudson and Golding. Hudson is writing the script for [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content