You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

AT&T-Time Warner Merger: Is the Battle With DOJ or President Trump?

WASHINGTON — If the Justice Department challenges AT&T’s proposed merger with Time Warner in court, the legal question will be, on what grounds?

Politically, though, the focus is likely to be on the role of President Donald Trump.

Trump routinely attacks one of the crown jewels of the transaction, Time Warner-owned CNN, and for months there have been concerns and speculation that the White House would use the transaction as a way to punish the network.

The DOJ met with AT&T officials earlier this week and told them that they needed to divest the Turner Networks, which include CNN, Turner Classic Movies, and TBS, for the deal to proceed, according to a source familiar with the negotiations. There were also reports that the DOJ told AT&T that it could instead sell DirecTV to secure approval.

AT&T has argued that the transaction is the type of vertical merger that hasn’t traditionally raised antitrust red flags, but its CFO on Wednesday acknowledged that the timeline for the deal’s closing is “now uncertain.”

Randall Stephenson, the CEO of AT&T, denied that the company was entertaining the idea of selling CNN or offered to do so. CNN quoted an unnamed DOJ official who said that the offer was made.

“Throughout this process, I have never offered to sell CNN and have no intention of doing so,” Stephenson said on Wednesday.

The latest news came as a surprise to many legal observers and even public interest advocates who, while opposed to the transaction, haven’t expected it to be blocked.

“There is no legal case here for the DOJ to make that either with or without the Turner networks, this transaction violates antitrust law,” said Larry Downes, project director at Georgetown’s Center for Business and Public Policy. “It is a very strange move, and one that from a legal standpoint doesn’t make any sense.”

Craig Aaron, the president and CEO of Free Press, which opposes the merger, said that while the divestitures could soften the merger’s consumer harms, “no matter where you come down on this merger, everyone should agree that the government shouldn’t base antitrust decisions or FCC rulings on whether it likes CNN’s coverage.”

Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), who also opposes the merger, said that “Any indication that this administration is using its power to weaken media organizations it doesn’t like would be a profoundly disturbing development.”

During the summer, the New York Times reported that an unnamed White House official viewed the pending merger as a way to extract “leverage” over CNN.

That led to a number of Senate Democrats, including Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), to fire off letters to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and to Trump, expressing concerns of political interference in the antitrust review. On CNN’s “Reliable Sources” on Sunday, Kellyanne Conway, Trump’s White House counselor, was asked about whether Trump was involved in the review of the transaction and said, “We’re not going to interfere with that here.”

The White House issued a statement denying that Trump talked to Sessions about the merger, and that no White House official was authorized to speak to the Justice Department on the transaction. Makan Delrahim, the chief of the Justice Department’s antitrust division, said that he has “never been instructed by the White House on this or any other transaction under review by the antirust division.”

During the campaign Trump said that his administration would not approve the merger, citing AT&T’s potential ownership of CNN, and because “it’s too much concentration of power in the hands of too few.”

Since then, though, the thinking on Wall Street has been that the merger would secure approval, despite the campaign rhetoric.

Before his appointment, Delrahim said that he didn’t see any antitrust problems with the transaction.

But that has changed.

That’s why some Wall Street analysts are puzzled over the latest development in the DOJ’s review. Amy Yong, an analyst with Macquarie Securities, said that even if AT&T shed the Turner cable networks, the structure of the deal would still remain the same.

“You never know,” she said. “Politics is difficult to handicap. Because this is a closed book, it is really hard to gauge any direction on what is going on behind closed doors, and I think that is the issue.”

Downes said that there has not been a successful legal challenge to a vertical merger — the category of the AT&T-Time Warner transaction — since the 1970s. Instead, the DOJ tends to challenge horizontal transactions that remove competition from the marketplace.

Others believe that the Justice Department is hardly out of bounds in raising the idea of shedding assets. A number of public interest advocates have argued that the combined company would have the incentive to withhold its cable channels from rival platforms. There have been concerns over AT&T’s offering of DirecTV streaming to its wireless subscribers without it counting toward data caps.

Diana Moss, the president of the American Antitrust Institute, said that she “read this purely as the DOJ having identified serious enough vertical competitive concerns with the AT&T-Time Warner merger that they are requiring a structural remedy (e.g., divestiture).” When the deal was announced, there were already concerns about the ability of the bulked-up company to gain an advantage in the marketplace, particularly when it comes to programming for AT&T’s wireless services.

Rivals have met privately with Justice Department officials to privately air their take on the transaction, and during the summer, Starz released an economic analysis of the transaction that warned of a “significant likelihood that the merged firm would have both the incentive and the ability to foreclose HBO’s primary competitors, Starz and Showtime, from access to AT&T’s subscribers.”

Dan Birk, partner at Eimer Stahl LLP, which focuses on antitrust litigation, said that the laws that prohibit mergers that could be anticompetitive are “fairly broad” and that “markets can be narrowly defined to all sorts of things.” He also noted that although this is a vertical merger, there may be aspects to the deal that have the impact of eliminating competition.

“It is not unusual for [the government] to define what they should be divesting,” he said.

He added, “It is not unusual at all in the context of transactions generally. Most large transactions that do involve some competitive effects end up being cleared by some sort of divestiture.”

In this case, though, there is the possibility of a long, protracted public court battle, one that will be a contrast to the way that the merger has faced government scrutiny so far, which is to say very much in private.

More Politics

  • President Donald Trump listens to a

    White House Orders Administration Officials to Skip Correspondents' Dinner

    WASHINGTON — The White House is ordering administration officials to skip this year’s White House Correspondents’ Association dinner amid ongoing attacks by President Trump toward the news media, CNN and other news outlets reported on Tuesday. Trump already announced that he would not attend the dinner and would instead hold a rally that evening, as [...]

  • President Trump to Make State Visit

    President Trump to Make State Visit to the U.K. in June

    Buckingham Palace has confirmed U.S. President Donald Trump will make an official state visit to the U.K. this summer. British Prime Minister Theresa May promised a state visit, with its accompanying pomp and pageantry, when meeting the President shortly after he took office in 2016. The British Royal family’s official Twitter account confirmed it was [...]

  • Seth Moulton Launches Presidential Bid

    Rep. Seth Moulton Launches 2020 Presidential Bid

    WASHINGTON — Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), an Iraq veteran who has diverged from Democratic leadership in the House in recent years, announced Monday that he is running for president, saying that “decades of division and corruption have broken our democracy.” Moulton confirmed that he was running in an appearance on ABC’s “Good Morning America.” He [...]

  • Mueller Report Book Editions Top Amazon's

    Mueller Report Book Editions Shoot to Top of Best-Seller Lists at Amazon, Barnes & Noble

    Robert Mueller is now a best-selling author. Book publishers’ forthcoming editions of the special counsel’s report zoomed to the top of the Amazon’s and Barnes & Noble’s lists of book best-sellers Friday. That comes a day after the report was publicly released, culminating the nearly two-year investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election [...]

  • Pete Buttigieg Show Business Donations

    Mayor Pete Buttigieg Is Totally Up for Booking Phish for His Inauguration

    Mayor Pete Buttigieg’s campaign seems to be going Phish-ing… in the best possible sense. (Unless you just hate the band Phish so much there is no best possible sense.) The Democratic presidential candidate has previously indicated his love for the group, and when a reporter suggested Phish play at his theoretical swearing-in festivities in 2021, [...]

  • National Enquirer - Jeff Bezos

    Hudson Media CEO James Cohen Purchases the National Enquirer

    Hudson Media’s CEO James Cohen announced Thursday that he will purchase the National Enquirer as well as American Media’s other tabloids, the Globe and the National Examiner. With the purchase of the National Enquirer, which Cohen reportedly bought for $100 million, he plans to strengthen their collaborative efforts, documentary shows, weekly podcasts, and theme parks. [...]

  • Donald Trump

    HBO Fires Back at Trump's 'Game of Thrones'-Inspired 'No Collusion' Tweet

    HBO is firing back at President Donald Trump after he sent another “Game of Thrones”-inspired tweet in response to the release of a redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on the Russia investigation. “Though we can understand the enthusiasm for ‘Game of Thrones’ now that the final season has arrived, we still prefer [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content