×

Appeals Court Rejects VidAngel’s Bid to Overturn Injunction

The VidAngel filtering service will remain shut down, following a ruling Thursday from a three-judge panel upholding an injunction against the service.

VidAngel was forced to shutter its service in December, after U.S. District Judge André Birotte Jr. ruled that several studios were likely to succeed in their lawsuit claiming that the service violated their copyrights. The family-friendly streaming service filters out offensive language, nudity, and other objectionable content from mainstream movies. It does so without a license, contending that its service is exempt from copyright claims under the federal Family Movie Act.

Birotte disagreed, and on Thursday a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel upheld his injunction. The Family Movie Act requires that a filtering service use an “authorized” copy of the work in question. VidAngel argues that because it begins with lawfully purchased DVD copies — which it then decrypts and copies to a server — its service begins with “authorized” copies. Writing for the panel, Judge Andrew David Hurwitz made quick work of that argument.

“VidAngel’s interpretation would create a giant loophole in copyright law, sanctioning infringement so long as it filters some content and a copy of the work was lawfully purchased at some point,” Hurwitz wrote. “But, virtually all piracy of movies originates in some way from a legitimate copy. If the mere purchase of an authorized copy alone precluded infringement liability under the FMA, the statute would severely erode the commercial value of the public performance right in the digital context, permitting, for example, unlicensed streams which filter out only a movie’s credits.”

VidAngel also argued that its service is permitted under the “fair use” doctrine in copyright law, which requires some alteration in the copyrighted work that creates a new work. Hurwitz also rejected that argument.

“Although removing objectionable content may permit a viewer to enjoy a film, this does not necessarily ‘add something new’ or change the ‘expression, meaning, or message’ of the film,” he wrote. “‘Star Wars’ is still ‘Star Wars,’ even without Princess Leia’s bikini scene.”

In a statement, VidAngel attorney Peter Stris said the company was “disappointed” in the ruling. “We’re reviewing our strategy for moving forward,” he said.

The unanimous ruling was hardly a surprise. Shortly before oral argument in June, Judge Carlos Bea turned to Hurwitz and said the case would be “a lot easier” than the case they had just heard, which involved the constitutionality of a police search. Hurwitz agreed: “Me too,” he said.

The following week, VidAngel launched a new service that filters Amazon and Netflix. Courts have not yet ruled on the legality of that platform. Birotte declined VidAngel’s request to clarify that the new service is not covered by the existing injunction. To be careful, VidAngel has avoided filtering any content owned by the plaintiff studios — Disney, 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros., and LucasFilm.

VidAngel CEO Neal Harmon issued a statement stressing that the ruling has no bearing on the new service.

“We remain open for business,” Harmon said. “While all of the legal back-and-forth plays out, we know our customers are grateful to still have a way to protect their kids and filter harmful content. On the legal front, we are just getting started. We will fight for a family’s right to filter on modern technology all the way.”

While the studios contend that VidAngel is seeking to run an unlicensed streaming service, VidAngel argues that the studios are effectively shutting down filtering altogether, thereby gutting the 2005 Family Movie Act. Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch, who wrote the act, recently noted that technology has advanced since the act was codified, and urged studios to find a way to permit filtering on streaming services.

More Biz

  • After Yet Another Rejection, What Could

    After Yet Another Rejection, What Could Be Next for Woodstock 50?

    In the wake of the Town of Vernon’s third rejection of Woodstock 50’s permit application to hold its music festival at a venue in the Upstate New York municipality, one may well wonder what the troubled event’s next move might be. In the hours after the latest rejection was announced, even the optimistic-bordering-on-unrealistic producers sounded [...]

  • US actor Kevin Spacey (C) is

    Kevin Spacey Sexual Assault Case Dropped in Nantucket

    Nantucket prosecutors have dropped a sexual assault case against actor Kevin Spacey, citing the “unavailability” of the complaining witness. Spacey had been accused of groping an 18-year-old busboy at the Club Car restaurant in July 2016. He was charged with indecent sexual assault, and a trial was set to be held in the fall. However, [...]

  • Plume of black smoke rising from

    Universal Music Updates Staff on Fire Damage in Internal Memo (Read)

    Ahead of an expected motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed last month by several artists over damage in the 2008 fire that destroyed hundreds of thousands of master recordings, according to the New York Times, the company’s chief archivist, Pat Kraus, issued a memo to the staff that has been obtained by Variety. While the [...]

  • CAA Signs Jay Shetty

    CAA Signs Jay Shetty

    CAA has signed award-winning host, storyteller, and viral content creator Jay Shetty for representation. Shetty’s videos have been viewed more than 4.5 billion times and he’s amassed more than 30 million followers across social media, becoming Facebook’s No. 1 creator on the platform with 24 million followers. After graduating university in the U.K., Shetty moved [...]

  • gordon-ramsay-masterclass-review

    Gordon Ramsay and Studio Ramsay Return to WME for Representation

    Superstar TV chef Gordon Ramsay has returned to WME for representation after eight years with CAA. WME will represent Ramsay and his production company, Studio Ramsay, in all areas. Ramsay is one of the most recognizable names in the culinary world after establishing himself as a TV star in the U.K. and U.S. Studio Ramsay [...]

  • Jim Gosnell

    APA Seeks to Move Assistant's Harassment Suit to Arbitration

    APA filed a motion Tuesday seeking to force an ex-assistant to arbitrate her claims of sexual harassment and verbal abuse. The motion, filed in L.A. Superior Court, accuses the former assistant of fabricating texts and emails in order to accuse the agency of fostering a “toxic, pervasive and sexually abusive environment.” The assistant, known in [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content