×
You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Appeals Court Refuses to Reinstate President Trump’s Travel Ban

An appeals court ruled against reinstating President Donald Trump’s travel and immigration ban.

A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that the government had “not shown a likelihood of success on the merits of it appeal, nor has it shown that failure to enter a stay would cause irreparable injury, and therefore we deny this emergency motion for a stay.” The question before the judges was on whether Trump’s executive order, issued last month, should be put on hold while the weighty issues of its constitutionality are considered.

Trump’s travel ban had been challenged by attorneys general from the state of Washington and Minnesota, and dozens of tech companies, including Amazon, Google, and Netflix.

The appellate judges considering the case were Michelle Friedland, an appointee of President Barack Obama; Richard Clifton, an appointee of President George W. Bush; and William Canby, an appointee of President Jimmy Carter.

A district court judge granted a temporary restraining order last week that put Trump’s executive order on hold nationwide. The Trump administration appealed the district court’s decision.

“SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!” Trump tweeted in reaction to the ruling.

Trump’s order temporarily restricted entry into the United States from seven Muslim-majority countries, and halted the flow of refugees into the U.S. for 120 days.

Earlier in the week, at a one-hour hearing before the 9th Circuit, Noah Purcell, attorney for Washington state, argued that reinstating it would harm the state, separate families, and prevent students and faculty from entering the country.

August Flentje, representing the federal government, argued that Judge James Robart’s temporary restraining order was an “extraordinary” action in that it enjoined a presidential national security decision “based on some newspaper articles.”

Technically, the 9th Circuit was not considering the merits of the case — whether Trump’s order was a constitutional violation in singling out Muslim-majority countries. The executive order restricted travel from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen, and suspends entry indefinitely of all Syrian refugees.

But the motivations behind Trump’s order were brought up at Tuesday’s hearing.

The judges noted that Washington state and Minnesota, in challenging Trump’s executive order, had presented evidence in support of their argument that the president intended to disfavor Muslims. The states cited Trump’s campaign statements about his intent to implement a “Muslim ban.”

“The States’ claims raise serious allegations and present significant constitutional questions,” the judges said in the ruling.

The judges declined to limit the scope of the temporary restraining order. They noted that the federal government had offered no evidence that “any alien from any of the countries named in the order has perpetrated a terrorist attack in the United States. Rather than present evidence to explain the need for the Executive Order, the Government has taken the position that we much not review its decision at all. We disagree…”

In their ruling, the 9th Circuit judges also rejected the administration’s claim that the president’s decisions about immigration policy are “unreviewable.”

“There is no precedent to support this claimed unreviewability, which runs contrary to the fundamental structure of our constitutional democracy,” the judges said.

More Biz

  • Kevin Tsujihara

    Kevin Tsujihara's Ouster Kicks Off a Week of Major Disruption in the Media Business

    The sudden ouster of Warner Bros. Entertainment chief Kevin Tsujihara kicked off what is likely to go down as one of the most extraordinary weeks in Hollywood history, spelling enormous turmoil and transition across the media landscape. In addition to the news about Tsujihara, which comes amid a wider shake-up of leadership at AT&T’s WarnerMedia, [...]

  • Disney Fox mega deal acquisition Illustration

    Disney Completes 21st Century Fox Acquisition

    Before the East Coast airing of “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” ends tonight, Disney will formally seal the deal on its $71 billion acquisition of 21st Century Fox. “This is an extraordinary and historic moment for us — one that will create significant long-term value for our company and our shareholders,” Disney chairman-CEO Bob Iger said in [...]

  • Chinese Tech Firm Huawei Seeks Content

    Beleaguered Chinese Tech Firm Huawei Seeks Content for Expansion Into Southeast Asia

    One of the most surprising first-time attendees at FilMart is Chinese tech giant Huawei, which has come to Hong Kong to acquire the video content it needs to support its strategy of expansion into Southeast Asia. The company is currently embroiled in a PR nightmare as it defends itself against accusations that its equipment could [...]

  • Viacom HQ LA

    Viacom Goes to War With AT&T Over DirecTV Carriage Deal

    Viacom has declared war against AT&T, blasting the telco giant on several fronts as the companies wrestle over a carriage renewal deal that is vital to Viacom’s long-term financial health. As of today, Viacom has begun running crawls and promo spots on its channels warning viewers that Nickelodeon, Comedy Central, BET, MTV and other channels [...]

  • Peloton Sued for $150 Million for

    Peloton Sued for $150 Million for Using Drake, Lady Gaga Music Without License

    A group of publishers including Downtown Music Publishing, Pulse Music Publishing, ole, peermusic, Ultra Music, Big Deal Music, Reservoir, Round Hill, TRO Essex Music Group and The Royalty Network filed a lawsuit against Peloton for infringement of more than a thousand musical works, according to a statement from the National Music Publishers Association. The plaintiffs are [...]

  • Bruce Ramer Re-Appointed to Corporation for

    Bruce Ramer Re-Appointed to Corporation for Public Broadcasting Board

    Top showbiz attorney Bruce Ramer has been reappointed to the board of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the nonprofit org that administers federal funding for public broadcasting. Ramer, a partner at Gang, Tyre, Ramer, Brown & Passman, was elected chair of the CPB board in October. He previously served as board chair from 2010-2012. His [...]

  • Gary Knell

    Listen: National Geographic Chief Gary Knell on Disney Future, Fox's Legacy

    The marriage of National Geographic Partners and Disney, which becomes official today, is the proverbial brand match made in heaven. Disney is taking over the stewardship of Nat Geo Partners — a joint venture with the National Geographic Society — as part of its acquisition of 21st Century Fox. The transition comes at a time [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content