You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Judges Weigh Whether to Reinstate Trump’s Travel Ban

The motivations behind President Trump’s executive order temporarily halting travel from seven countries came under scrutiny before a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday, as an attorney challenging the order said that there was “shocking” evidence in the form of Trump’s own public statements proposing to ban Muslim entry into the U.S.

The question before the appellate court is whether to reverse a lower-court’s grant of a temporary restraining order last week that sidelined the implementation of Trump’s travel ban, which prohibits citizens of Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen from entering the United States for 90 days. The one-hour hearing was not to weigh the merits of the case, and marked what may be just the beginning stages of a protracted legal battle.

Audio of the arguments was streamed and aired live on cable news. The case has drawn the interest of dozens of tech companies, which filed friend-of-the-court briefs opposing Trump’s executive order and supporting a challenge to it brought by the states of Washington and Minnesota.

Noah Purcell, the attorney for Washington state, said that Trump’s action, if reinstated, would prevent university students and faculty from entering the country, and that it would separate families and cost the state tax revenue.

He and representatives from other states are raising constitutional questions over the order, as the seven states included in the ban are all Muslim majority countries. They also have cited Trump’s own statements on proposing a Muslim ban, as well as those of supporters like former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani.

But Judge Richard Clifton noted that the seven countries included in the order represented less than 15% of the Muslim population. In other words, if it was an effort to ban Muslims, why not include other countries?

He noted that presidential orders in the past have limited travel from specific countries like Cuba and North Korea.

“All of those orders have been narrower than here,” Purcell responded. He said that to prove religious discrimination they did not need to show that it only affected Muslims.

August Flentje, representing the federal government, said that Judge James Robart’s temporary restraining order was an “extraordinary” action in that it enjoined a presidential national security decision “based on some newspaper articles.”

But the judges queried him on the urgency of Trump’s executive order. Judge William Canby asked how many offenses had been committed by visitors from the seven countries — and then, answering himself, he noted that there were none.

But Flentje pointed to “a number of people from Somalia connected to Al Shabab.” He acknowledged that those instances were not in the court record.

Judge Michelle T. Friedland also seemed to challenge Flentje on the role of the judiciary in reviewing presidential orders on immigration. “Are you arguing that the president’s decision in that regard is unreviewable?” Flentje answered yes.

A ruling is expected this week.

More Biz

  • David Rhodes CBS News

    CBS News Faces New Challenges in Weeks Ahead

    At CBS News, President David Rhodes has a series of important decisions to make that could affect the trajectories of some of TV’s best-known news programs. As its parent company seeks to move forward from recent seismic events – the ouster of its former CEO, Leslie Moonves; a corporate probe into its workplace culture; and [...]

  • Listen: Sarah Bernhardt and the Birth

    Listen: How Sarah Bernhardt and Eleonora Duse Helped Create Modern Celebrity Culture

    They were pioneers in the business of superstardom more than a century ago. Behind the scenes, legendary actors Sarah Bernhardt and Eleonora Duse were also entrepreneurs who ran their own companies and controlled every aspect of their careers. The new biography “Playing to the Gods: Sarah Bernhardt, Eleonora Duse and the Rivalry That Changed Acting [...]

  • Charter Communications logo

    Charter Reaches $174 Million Settlement on Internet-Throttling Fraud Suit

    Charter Communications agreed to a settlement valued at $174.2 million to resolve a lawsuit alleging the U.S.’s second-biggest cable operator defrauded broadband customers by failing to deliver promised internet speeds. According to the terms of the settlement with the New York Attorney General’s Office, Charter will pay $62.5 million in direct refunds to 700,000 active broadband [...]

  • Making a Murderer

    'Making A Murderer' Detective Sues Netflix for Defamation

    A retired sheriff’s detective sued Netflix for defamation on Monday, alleging that the hit series “Making a Murderer” falsely suggested that he planted evidence to frame a murder suspect. Andrew Colborn filed suit in Manitowoc County Circuit Court in Wisconsin, alleging that he had been subject to “worldwide ridicule, contempt and disdain” since the docuseries [...]

  • Yael Stone Geoffrey Rush

    'OITNB' Actress Yael Stone Accuses Geoffrey Rush of Sexual Harassment

    In a New York Times article published Sunday, “Orange Is the New Black” actress Yael Stone alleged that Geoffrey Rush harassed her numerous times while they both worked on a theater production in 2010. She said he exposed himself to her, sent her sexually suggestive text messages, and used a mirror to spy on her [...]

  • Laura Donnelly

    CAA Signs 'The Ferryman' Actress Laura Donnelly (EXCLUSIVE)

    CAA has inked Laura Donnelly for representation. Donnelly, who was most recently represented by ICM Partners, won the prestigious Laurence Olivier Award for best actress this year for her performance in Jez Butterworth’s play “The Ferryman,” directed by Oscar and Tony winner Sam Mendes. The production has also received two more Olivier Awards, including best [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content