SiriusXM Stands Out in Subscription Content Space by Bucking Trends

SiriusXM probably isn’t the first name that comes to mind when you think about subscription content, yet it’s one of the most successful companies in that category.

The U.S. satellite radio provider has been able to buck the negative trends faced by other content providers. Chief among those is the rising price of content: What’s striking about SiriusXM is just how low its content costs are. Spotify, the largest subscription-music provider, pays well over 80% of its revenue in royalties and other content costs; cable operators pay more than half their revenue for programming. But SiriusXM spends less than 30% of revenue on programming and royalties combined.

sources: Company Reporting, jackdaw research Analysis

Another challenge is the need to provide original content in order to maintain or increase subscriber share. SiriusXM has always done this, offering up Howard Stern, Opie and Anthony, and exclusive sports channels. But even as it’s made these investments — including a recent new deal with Stern — it has kept total costs down by rapidly growing its subscriber base. Key to that has been leveraging car manufacturers, which account for almost half of SiriusXM’s new customers. Some 40% of buyers of cars that come with free trials become paying customers after the trial ends.

SiriusXM is also seeing increased advertising revenue, with year-on-year gains of 10%-20% over the past few years, a faster rate of growth than its subscription revenue. (However, advertising represents only about 3% of the company’s total revenue.)

What, then, enables SiriusXM to buck the trends? It’s hard to dispute the fact that the company’s cheaper costs have roots in its monopoly position. But that’s a somewhat lazy explanation — both Sirius and XM were doing well independently before they merged, despite strong competition between them.

sources: Company Reporting, jackdaw research Analysis

The real reason is that SiriusXM has hit a Netflix-like sweet spot in terms of its price and package. Its average revenue per user, at $12.80, is in the same ballpark as what Netflix charges, and many users arguably spend more time in their cars than they do streaming content on Netflix.

Of course, SiriusXM has less direct competition than Netflix has, but there are other options for in-car entertainment: free content in the form of traditional radio and podcasts, and paid content like audio books and subscription music. Other companies could one day provide subscription infotainment. And in the longer term, there’s the prospect of self-driving cars, which could lead to demand for more visual content.

But for now, SiriusXM looks to be motoring along just fine.

Jan Dawson is the founder and chief analyst at Jackdaw Research, an advisory firm for the consumer technology market.

More Voices

  • FX Confronts Streaming Thanks to Disney

    Kicking and Screaming, FX Is Forced to Confront Future in the Stream (Column)

    During his network’s presentation at the winter Television Critics Assn. press tour, FX chief John Landgraf made waves — and headlines — by mounting perhaps his most direct criticism yet of Netflix. Landgraf, whose briefings to the press tend to rely heavily on data about the volume of shows with which FX’s competitors flood the [...]

  • Longtime TV Editor Recalls Working for

    How a Bad Director Can Spoil the Show (Guest Column)

    I have been blessed with editing some of TV’s greatest shows, working with some of the industry’s greatest minds. “The Wonder Years,” “Arrested Development,” “The Office,” “Scrubs,” “Pushing Daisies” and, most recently, “A Series of Unfortunate Events.” I have earned an Emmy, ACE Eddie Awards, and many nominations. But whatever kudos I’ve received, over my [...]

  • Stock market Stock buyback

    Stock Buybacks Leave Firms Without Funds to Invest in Future (Column)

    Corporate giants on the S&P 500 have spent more than $720 billion during the past year on stock buybacks. Media and entertainment firms account for only a fraction of that spending, but even $1 million spent on share repurchases seems a foolhardy expenditure at this transformational moment for the industry. The record level of spending [...]

  • Hollywood Has Come Far With Diversity

    An Insider's Look at Hollywood's Diversity Efforts and How Far It Still Needs to Go

    I am a white man working in Hollywood. I grew up in Beverlywood, an all-white, predominantly Jewish, Los Angeles neighborhood sandwiched between 20th Century Fox Studios and MGM, where my elementary school had only one black student. I am compelled to write about diversity in Hollywood because “diversity” — in front of and behind the camera [...]

  • Venice Film Festival A Star is

    How Venice, Toronto and Telluride Festivals Stole Cannes' Luster (Column)

    In all the years I’ve been attending film festivals, I have never seen a lineup that looked as good on paper as Venice’s did this fall, boasting new films by Alfonso Cuarón (“Roma”), Damien Chazelle (“First Man”), Paul Greengrass (“22 July”), Mike Leigh (“Peterloo”) and the Coen brothers (“The Ballad of Buster Scruggs”) in competition, [...]

  • Black Women in Medicine BTS

    Hollywood Needs to Include People With Disabilities on Both Sides of the Camera (Guest Column)

    In five years, nothing has changed. Despite open calls for greater diversity and inclusion, recent research shows that there was little change in the number of characters with disabilities in popular films in 2017. A study conducted by the Annenberg Inclusion Initiative of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism found that [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content