Netflix $2 Rate Increase: The Right Price at the Right Time

Netflix can seemingly do no wrong. But it wasn’t long ago that CEO Reed Hastings made one of the biggest blunders in recent corporate history. Back in 2011, Hastings hiked the price for those who wanted both streaming and DVD rental from $10 to $16, and Netflix lost 200,000 subscribers in six months. It was a disaster, though one from which the company has recovered.

This month, Netflix imposes the first price increase on its existing subscriber base — $2 — since that debacle. This time around, however, the company is doing the right thing for the right reason.

Netflix management proclaimed an ambitious goal last year for its domestic streaming business: hitting 40% margins by 2020. The company’s U.S. streaming contribution margin is one of the most amazingly consistent trend lines in its sector — rising steadily over the last few years — so it seems on track to hit that target on time, or even early.

The key to that climb was raising prices strictly for new subscribers in 2014 and 2015, driving solid increases in average revenue per paying subscriber. These increases have contributed nicely to profits, despite Netflix’s ballooning content costs, which will amount to $5 billion in 2016 alone.

Given the fluctuations in Netflix’s costs from one quarter to another, the impact is best seen on an annual basis. Profit per subscriber has increased from just over $2 in 2012 to more than $3 in 2015, and the first price increase in late 2014 helped expand the margin more significantly for 2015 than for any of the three previous years.

A big part of growing margins has been the economies of scale that come from a rapidly growing subscriber base. From first-quarter 2012 to first-quarter 2016, Netflix doubled its base to 46 million U.S. customers and saw margins grow from 14% to 35%. But as domestic growth cools, the big question is whether the phasing in of the price increase for many subscribers will drive higher churn.

There are several reasons to believe the effect won’t be anything like as dramatic as last time. For one thing, the increase is more modest: 25% versus 60%. Also, the value of a Netflix subscription has increased significantly in recent years. Finally, Netflix plans to phase in the price increase over the rest of the year, rather than introducing it in one swift move, so even if there is a churn effect, it’ll be spread out over three quarters.

The $2 price increase will likely cause the most churn among those with limited incomes. But the overall impact should be modest, perhaps a couple of hundred fewer subscribers per quarter over the rest of the year — something Netflix can easily absorb as it pursues those 40% margins.

Jan Dawson is the founder and chief analyst at Jackdaw Research, an advisory firm which covers the consumer technology market.

More Voices

  • Deadwood HBO

    Netflix, HBO Get Ready to Rumble as Emmy Nominations and Phase 2 of Voting Loom

    Last year, Netflix ended HBO’s 17-year Emmy-nomination domination, posting 112 nods overall (to HBO’s 108), continuing the service’s miraculous rise. Now comes the next goal, which may be in reach this year: Surpassing HBO’s all-time record. HBO earned 126 nominations in 2015, its all-time best and a number that Netflix could hit this year. It’s [...]

  • Ellen Sitcom Original TV Show

    GLAAD Chief: Hollywood Needs to Continue Playing a Role in LGBTQ Progress

    This Pride Month is not only about celebrating — it’s also about reflecting how far LGBTQ acceptance has come since the Stonewall riots catalyzed the LGBTQ movement 50 years ago, and about honoring the trailblazers and leaders who propelled LGBTQ visibility and issues forward in what many social justice experts describe as relatively lightning speed.   [...]

  • Matthew Shepard MOth Judy LGBT Activist

    Matthew Shepard's Mother: Why Hate Crime Is Only Conquered When We Speak Up

    In January, “Empire” star Jussie Smollett reported a violent attack at the hands of two men outside his Chicago apartment building. Local police and prosecutors said Smollett fabricated the event, which the actor still vehemently denies. More than a dozen criminal charges, including falsifying a police report, were filed and later dropped by state attorneys. [...]

  • Stonewall Riots 50 Years Later

    What the Stonewall Riots Mean 50 Years Later

    For one to fully understand the impact of the Stonewall riots, it is important to comprehend the darkness that LGBTQ Americans faced every day of their lives in the years leading up to Stonewall. Allow me to take you back to the 1950s and ’60s, when I was coming of age as a closeted gay [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content