You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Why Studios Fear Putting Gay Characters in Movies Like ‘Star Wars’ and ‘The Avengers’

If the Star Wars universe is really as expansive as Disney hoped it would be when it shelled out $4 billion to buy the rights to the Wookies, Ewoks, and droids that populate the far reaches of space, then at some point the Millennium Falcon should stumble across a gay person. Even a gay alien would be a welcome sign of social progress.

But why stop there? There could be gay Avengers, a transgender animation protagonist, and a lesbian MI-6 spy. And if James Bond is really so good in bed, why is he so square when it comes to sexual exploration?

At a time when every weekend brings a new sequel or superhero film, adding gay characters might even be a way to inject fresh life into tired franchises. It could also expand the audiences, making it a smart financial decision, not just a boon for diversity.

Gay people have become more visible in every facet of life — from politics to music to Silicon Valley — and yet they continue to be whitewashed out of major American films, as evident from Monday’s GLAAD report. It’s not just that they aren’t piloting the Starship Enterprise. Onscreen, they’re not even manning the counter at bodegas.

The absence of gay people in lead or supporting roles is odd given that television and popular music have so completely embraced them. Moreover, young people — the bread and butter of the movie industry — are overwhelmingly less homophobic and more supportive of gay rights than previous generations.

The reason, pure and simple, is fear. It’s not that the movie business is anti-gay. It’s not. Many of the people behind and in front of the camera are gay, as are numerous studio executives. They’re supportive of gay rights — often with their time and their checkbooks. But they are also scared and what scares them the most about films with gay characters is the prospect of marketing them to foreign audiences. It’s one thing for a studio executive to support gay marriage. It’s another to risk $200 million on a movie with a gay protagonist that needs to play in China and Russia, countries where LGBT citizens face discrimination, legal challenges, and violence.

That’s a shame. As GLAAD CEO Sarah Kate Ellis noted in its recent survey of gay portrayals on film, the failure to include more gay characters in films “keeps old prejudices alive and creates an unsafe environment, not only here in America, but around the world where most audiences see these depictions.”

So far, Hollywood has not been heeding the call. The GLAAD report makes clear that Star Wars is just the tip of the iceberg. The group would probably settle for not being the punchline in a Kevin Hart comedy. Of the 126 major studio releases last year, only 22 of them — or 17.5% — featured LGBT characters. That was roughly the same percentage of characters that appeared in films in 2014.

It wasn’t always that way. Studios do deserve some credit for providing affirmative portraits of gay life with ’90s films like “The Birdcage,” “In and Out,” “As Good as it Gets,” and “Philadelphia.” Some of the LGBT figures seem camp or stereotypical in retrospect, but they were a huge step forward from the cross-dressing murderers that populated “Dressed to Kill” and “Silence of the Lambs.”

But several of those movies were mid-budget films, the kind that studios don’t make anymore. Instead, their financial focus is on comic book movies and science-fiction fantasies that command budgets in excess of $100 million. With budgets that huge, a film has to be popular all across the globe to make a profit. Studio executives are loath to risk alienating any of the major foreign markets that shun gay people.

The enormous strides that American society made towards greater tolerance for gays and lesbians probably has more to do with the personal connections that people have in their own lives — the knowledge that their neighbors, friends, and family members may be attracted to members of the same sex changed minds.

Some movie stars, at least, seem opening to journeying along the Kinsey scale, but expect them to meet opposition. Andrew Garfield once mused that there was no reason that Spider-Man couldn’t be gay. However, emails unearthed in the Sony hack show that as part of a licensing agreement with Marvel, Spider-Man must be heterosexual and Caucasian. Likewise, Ryan Reynolds told reporters he thought it would be “nice” for Deadpool to have a boyfriend in future installments.

“I certainly wouldn’t be the guy standing in the way of that,” Reynolds said. “That would be great.”

Having a gay person don a costume to fight crime would be a step forward, but the issues extend beyond superhero-land. The big screen pales in comparison to the small when it comes to offering up different kinds of LGBT characters. A look at some of the best that television has had to offer shows how far film has yet to travel. “Game of Thrones” has given viewers Oberyn Martell, a lusty bisexual swordsman. “Shameless” has Mickey Milkovich, the gay thug from the wrong side of the tracks. “Orange is the New Black” and “Girls” are notable for the sexual fluidity of their characters. And “Transparent” is grounded by Maura Pfefferman, whose journey through gender identity is dramatized in a sensitive, compelling, often ragged fashion. They represent a fuller spectrum of human experience, one rooted in vastly different social and economic settings.

As the television audience becomes more fractured, and consumers access content in different ways, over a myriad of devices, it has allowed programming that would have once been considered too niche to get a greenlight, to thrive. If the film industry eventually cracks along similar fault lines, one benefit could be the rise of more diverse kinds of characters, both people of color and LGBT figures.

So, yes, “Star Wars” should have a gay, bisexual, lesbian, or transgender character, but in the meantime, LGBT moviegoers would be happy to just see their own lives reflected on the big screen. The creative community gets that. During his press tour for “Star Wars: The Force Awakens,” J.J. Abrams made the point that he wanted the new franchise to be more inclusive.

“It’s important people see themselves represented in film,” Abrams told a crowd at Comic-Con.

True to his word, “The Force Awakens” features an ass-kicking female protagonist and a heroic black storm trooper, an improvement for a series that has historically been dominated by white males. But diversity doesn’t stop there. A galaxy far, far away should have room for gay people too.

More Film

  • Cannes: China's 'Summer of Changsha' Debuts

    Cannes: China's 'Summer of Changsha' Debuts Without Censorship Approval

    Chinese crime drama “Summer of Changsha” screened at the Cannes Film Festival in the Un Certain Regard section despite lacking the necessary approvals from China’s censors. It premiered without its director or creative team in attendance, who blamed “technical reasons” for their absence — marking the third time that Chinese censorship appears to have caused [...]

  • Jane Austin SAG AFTRA

    SAG-AFTRA Secretary-Treasurer Jane Austin Running for President

    Jane Austin, the National Secretary-Treasurer of SAG-AFTRA, has become the third candidate for the presidency of the performers union, joining incumbent Gabrielle Carteris and Matthew Modine. Austin is running as an independent for the top post at SAG-AFTRA, which has 160,000 members. Carteris will seek re-election as the head of the ticket for the Unite [...]

  • John Wick Chapter 3

    'John Wick: Chapter 3' Tones Down the Blood and Gore to Keep Look 'Totally Real'

    When Jeff Campbell, a visual effects supervisor with VFX studio Spin, initially set to work on the first “John Wick,” the 2014 action thriller from director Chad Stahelski and writer Derek Kolstad, he started with an industry-standard test: Establish a single, simple kill effect meant to get a sense of the look of the violence [...]

  • Louise Courvoisier’s ‘Mano a Mano’ Wins Cinéfondation

    Louise Courvoisier’s ‘Mano a Mano’ Wins Cannes Cinefondation Selection Top Prize

    CANNES–“Mano a Mano,” by Louise Courvoisier of France’s CinéFabrique, won the first prize Thursday at the 22nd Cinéfondation Selection,the Cannes Film Festival’s top film school shorts awards. The prize was awarded by a jury headed by French director Claire Denis (“Beau Travail”). The jury also included French actress Stacy Martin (“Godard mon amour”); Israeli writer-director Eran [...]

  • The Traitor

    Cannes Film Review: 'The Traitor'

    What surprises most about Marco Bellocchio’s Mafia drama “The Traitor” is just how straightforward it is. Given its subject — Tommaso Buscetta, the highest-ranking Mafia don to sing to the authorities — there were expectations that the director would deliver a theatrical drama along the lines of “Vincere,” but notwithstanding a few operatic flourishes, his [...]

  • Perfect Strangers

    Zhao Tao, Rajkumar Hirani Join Shanghai Festival Jury

    Italian director Paolo Genovese and Chinese actress Zhao Tao are among members of the jury for the upcoming Shanghai International Film Festival. They join the previously announced jury president, 2014 Cannes Palme d’Or winner Nuri Bilge Ceylan, the Turkish director behind last year’s “The Wild Pear Tree.” Genovese’s 2016 film “Perfect Strangers” made $7.7 million [...]

  • ‘An Easy Girl’ Wins Cannes Directors’

    ‘An Easy Girl’ Wins Cannes Directors’ Fortnight French-language Movie Prize

    CANNES  —  One of France’s most highly-regarded young women filmmakers, Rebecca Zlotowski, has won the Directors’ Fortnight prize for best French-language movie for “An Easy Girl,” a sensual coming of age tale set on France’s Cote d’Azur. From reviews published to date, “An Easy Girl” marks a return to form for Zlotowski after the disappointment [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content