×
You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

It Takes More Than Low Ratings to Kill a TV Series These Days

In 1993, CBS’ detective show “South of Sunset” premiered to such abysmal ratings opposite ABC’s “Home Improvement” that it was yanked after one episode. Moreover, breaking news prompted the network’s Los Angeles station to preempt the telecast, meaning the Beverly Hills-based drama went south without being broadcast anywhere near the boulevard from which the show derived its name.

Flash forward, and one of the fall’s most ghoulish annual rituals — guessing what will be the first TV programs to get canceled — has taken on a different complexion. Because today, low ratings don’t always tell the full story regarding what’s going to wind up on a slab.

Delayed viewing is a significant factor in muddying the picture, with programs sometimes receiving unexpected bumps thanks to DVR data that doesn’t come in ’til a few weeks after air. But even that aspect only scratches the surface of TV’s survival equation, which encompasses a show’s ownership, production costs and ancillary deals, such as international financing or sales to streaming services.

As a result, the raw next-day rating, once a pretty fair arbiter of viability, frequently doesn’t reveal much about a program’s contribution to the bottom line. In addition, third parties like Netflix and Hulu have further complicated the calculus by sweeping in and rescuing low-rated series that have been on a few years, or (in the case of the Emmy-nominated “Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt”) pilots that the original network hesitated about airing at all.

In other words, in this age of marauding zombies, what once could be written off as a dead show walking occasionally turns out to have unexpected life. And without knowing the whole range of deals and considerations surrounding a property, the numbers really can lie, even without resorting to the public-relations spin or creative accounting for which Hollywood is known.

CBS Entertainment chairman Nina Tassler addressed some of these issues during the TV Critics Assn. tour, noting how ratings for the network’s summer thrillers “Zoo” and “Extant” were almost irrelevant in relation to their profitability, thanks to lucrative streaming deals. Similarly, she noted that CBS makes money off shows like “Blue Bloods” and “Elementary” thanks to syndication and international demand, even though the Tom Selleck drama in particular attracts the sort of geriatric audience that traditionally represents a tough sell to advertisers.

Clearly, the press — which usually isn’t privy to all the arcane details of these arrangements — hasn’t caught up with the shifting dynamics. Take “Turn: Washington’s Spies,” which AMC surprisingly renewed for a third season. While the ratings hardly appeared to justify such a move, the Revolutionary War drama benefits from enough European loot that the network likely faced scant downside in giving the series continued liberty, not death.

Networks have sought to encourage greater restraint instead of drawing knee-jerk conclusions, citing the need for increased patience. Yet they haven’t provided much concrete information that would foster a more sophisticated view, and can’t resist crowing loudly at the first sign of success (witness Fox’s giddiness as last year’s “Empire” numbers rolled in — and up), which makes it harder to believe them when they insist there’s no need to panic when the Nielsen scorecard isn’t nearly as favorable.

Throw in the digital-age demand for immediate information, and the temptation remains strong to judge series based on opening-night numbers. Besides, after a summer’s worth of promotion for the major networks’ new-program onslaught that begins this month, poor initial turnout at the least suggests a notable lack of enthusiasm.

So if the premiere rating’s lousy, the odds still say a show likely will go the way of the dinosaur — or “South of Sunset.” But lacking the full picture, don’t start digging in the great TV burial ground just yet.

More Voices

  • Contract Placeholder Business

    WGA, Agents Face Tough Issues on New Franchise Pact (Column)

    The Writers Guild of America and the major talent agencies are seven weeks away from a deadline that could force film and TV writers to choose between their agents and their union. This is a battle that has been brewing for a year but few in the industry saw coming until a few weeks ago. [...]

  • FX Confronts Streaming Thanks to Disney

    Kicking and Screaming, FX Is Forced to Confront Future in the Stream (Column)

    During his network’s presentation at the winter Television Critics Assn. press tour, FX chief John Landgraf made waves — and headlines — by mounting perhaps his most direct criticism yet of Netflix. Landgraf, whose briefings to the press tend to rely heavily on data about the volume of shows with which FX’s competitors flood the [...]

  • Longtime TV Editor Recalls Working for

    How a Bad Director Can Spoil the Show (Guest Column)

    I have been blessed with editing some of TV’s greatest shows, working with some of the industry’s greatest minds. “The Wonder Years,” “Arrested Development,” “The Office,” “Scrubs,” “Pushing Daisies” and, most recently, “A Series of Unfortunate Events.” I have earned an Emmy, ACE Eddie Awards, and many nominations. But whatever kudos I’ve received, over my [...]

  • Stock market Stock buyback

    Stock Buybacks Leave Firms Without Funds to Invest in Future (Column)

    Corporate giants on the S&P 500 have spent more than $720 billion during the past year on stock buybacks. Media and entertainment firms account for only a fraction of that spending, but even $1 million spent on share repurchases seems a foolhardy expenditure at this transformational moment for the industry. The record level of spending [...]

  • Hollywood Has Come Far With Diversity

    An Insider's Look at Hollywood's Diversity Efforts and How Far It Still Needs to Go

    I am a white man working in Hollywood. I grew up in Beverlywood, an all-white, predominantly Jewish, Los Angeles neighborhood sandwiched between 20th Century Fox Studios and MGM, where my elementary school had only one black student. I am compelled to write about diversity in Hollywood because “diversity” — in front of and behind the camera [...]

  • Venice Film Festival A Star is

    How Venice, Toronto and Telluride Festivals Stole Cannes' Luster (Column)

    In all the years I’ve been attending film festivals, I have never seen a lineup that looked as good on paper as Venice’s did this fall, boasting new films by Alfonso Cuarón (“Roma”), Damien Chazelle (“First Man”), Paul Greengrass (“22 July”), Mike Leigh (“Peterloo”) and the Coen brothers (“The Ballad of Buster Scruggs”) in competition, [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content