Internet Keeps Big Musicians Big, But Doesn’t Launch New Acts

In music, a few superstar acts are making all the dough, and the rest are blaming the Internet and Spotify for decimating their finances.

But the truth is, most people are lonely, disconnected. They want to belong, and therefore they partake of what’s popular in order to have a basis of conversation.

In the information economy, it’s simple to ferret out what is a quality product. It happens in phones, it happens in social networks. Facebook succeeded not because of advertising, but because unlike MySpace, it just worked, and therefore people gravitated to it and spread the word about it.

And that’s the ultimate success — word of mouth. Which is why you can have a huge advertising campaign that results in a dud. Kinda like last year’s Tom Petty release, and definitely like this year’s Keith Richards release: incredible PR efforts with no one talking about the underlying product. And there’s new product every week, so why should we spend time digging deeper on the mediocre?

Unless you’re going to put out incredible music, you’re playing to your fans only; your audience isn’t going to grow. People are constantly exposed to great new stuff, and they’d rather listen to that. In fact, it turns out we all want the same thing.

So the tail is wagging the dog. And it hasn’t been this way since the dawn of advertising. You can make people aware, but with everything available instantly, with quality assessments easily accessible, and the ability to communicate with the world at your fingertips, it turns out the public is in control. This is not the way it was supposed to be. The Internet was supposed to level the playing field, let the cream rise to the top. Allow everybody to begin from the same starting line, and let the best person win.

Well, the starting lines are now staggered. Unless you have a head start, you’re almost definitely going to fail. And when we reach the finish line, we’ll find only a few men and women standing.

You can’t tour because no one wants to see you, not because expenses are so high. You’re broke not because streaming services don’t pay well, but because no one wants to listen to you. You can’t get ahead because you’re not in bed with the usual-suspect powers, with all their connections, not because your music isn’t good enough. You need the A-level manager, agent and label to push you.

You may be mad that everybody knows Bieber and Gomez, Perry and Swift, and not you. But the former are playing the game most people are paying attention to. And they’re the beneficiaries of committees of the best people creating and pounding their product.

You can play to your niche; there’s nothing wrong with that.

But to rail against music by committee, to agitate against streaming payments, is a fruitless effort. Wanna make change? First be a success. Create something as good as Max Martin does. Max not only helped add to Taylor Swift’s international pop phenomenon, he pushed the Weeknd into the top ranks.

There are fewer new stars than ever before. But that does not mean they will all sound the same forevermore.

Innovation works. We’re looking for the new and different. “Straight Outta Compton” proves this. But no review said “Compton” sucked. “Compton” had to vault a high bar. And once it did, its fans got the rest of America to go too.

We’re in the midst of a great consolidation. You can either obey the new rules or get left behind.

More Voices

  • FX Confronts Streaming Thanks to Disney

    Kicking and Screaming, FX Is Forced to Confront Future in the Stream (Column)

    During his network’s presentation at the winter Television Critics Assn. press tour, FX chief John Landgraf made waves — and headlines — by mounting perhaps his most direct criticism yet of Netflix. Landgraf, whose briefings to the press tend to rely heavily on data about the volume of shows with which FX’s competitors flood the [...]

  • Longtime TV Editor Recalls Working for

    How a Bad Director Can Spoil the Show (Guest Column)

    I have been blessed with editing some of TV’s greatest shows, working with some of the industry’s greatest minds. “The Wonder Years,” “Arrested Development,” “The Office,” “Scrubs,” “Pushing Daisies” and, most recently, “A Series of Unfortunate Events.” I have earned an Emmy, ACE Eddie Awards, and many nominations. But whatever kudos I’ve received, over my [...]

  • Stock market Stock buyback

    Stock Buybacks Leave Firms Without Funds to Invest in Future (Column)

    Corporate giants on the S&P 500 have spent more than $720 billion during the past year on stock buybacks. Media and entertainment firms account for only a fraction of that spending, but even $1 million spent on share repurchases seems a foolhardy expenditure at this transformational moment for the industry. The record level of spending [...]

  • Hollywood Has Come Far With Diversity

    An Insider's Look at Hollywood's Diversity Efforts and How Far It Still Needs to Go

    I am a white man working in Hollywood. I grew up in Beverlywood, an all-white, predominantly Jewish, Los Angeles neighborhood sandwiched between 20th Century Fox Studios and MGM, where my elementary school had only one black student. I am compelled to write about diversity in Hollywood because “diversity” — in front of and behind the camera [...]

  • Venice Film Festival A Star is

    How Venice, Toronto and Telluride Festivals Stole Cannes' Luster (Column)

    In all the years I’ve been attending film festivals, I have never seen a lineup that looked as good on paper as Venice’s did this fall, boasting new films by Alfonso Cuarón (“Roma”), Damien Chazelle (“First Man”), Paul Greengrass (“22 July”), Mike Leigh (“Peterloo”) and the Coen brothers (“The Ballad of Buster Scruggs”) in competition, [...]

  • Black Women in Medicine BTS

    Hollywood Needs to Include People With Disabilities on Both Sides of the Camera (Guest Column)

    In five years, nothing has changed. Despite open calls for greater diversity and inclusion, recent research shows that there was little change in the number of characters with disabilities in popular films in 2017. A study conducted by the Annenberg Inclusion Initiative of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism found that [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content