×

March Madness and the Limits of New TV Channel Packages

OTT offerings need more flexibility than 'skinny bundles' from Sony and Dish

There’s a set of rituals that accompanies my preparations to watch March Madness on TV each year: tuning in CBS’ “Selection Show,” filling in my brackets to predict who will win, and looking up my cable operator’s channel listings to figure out where on earth TruTV is on the dial.

It’s a sad commentary on the lowly status that this Turner-owned network, which shares TV rights to the games with CBS, TBS and TNT, occupies in my channel-cluttered mind. But the truth of the matter is that TruTV never graces my living-room screen about 360 days out of the year (a state of affairs the network cleverly satirized in a new marketing campaign).

And yet for a handful of days, TruTV does become a prime destination. It’s not alone in that regard either; there’s other channels that don’t register in my brain most of the year. But once in a blue moon, they become must-see TV due to some “event” programming that prompt them to pop on my radar.

Think about your own viewing behavior, and my hunch is you can relate. It’s a reflection of an overlooked attribute of the traditional channel bundle that people in the industry refer to as “optionality” — pay-TV subscribers’ ability to check out any channel whenever they desire.

The value of optionality is about be put to the test by the emerging trend of over-the-top TV options from a la carte choices like HBO Now to so-called “skinny bundles” like Sony’s Playstation Vue.

It’s not that OTT doesn’t provide great value in its own right by allowing budget-conscious consumers to make more targeted channel choices. But what this first wave of early adopters is reckoning with right now is how OTT limits optionality by restricting choice to a subset of the traditional channel bundle.

The research that OTT devotees love to tout is what a low percentage of all the many channels that get delivered to an average pay-TV household are actually watched: 17.5 out of 189.1 in 2014, according to Nielsen. But pay attention to the fine print: that 17.5 is defined as “consistently watched.” It would be interesting to see research on how many additional channels are inconsistently watched because there’s value to that viewing, too.

The customer value proposition for skinny bundles capitalizes on two powerful consumer impulses: viewer devotion to their favorite channels and viewer disgust with having to pay for channels they never watch. But what subs to Sling TV or PlayStation Vue may not account for is a middle ground between these two impulses subtle enough to risk being overshadowed by the aforementioned devotion and disgust: that favorite channels likely can’t cover 100% of the average viewer’s content choices.

Some consumers may have calculated the reduced price of skinny bundles is worth putting up with the occasional frustration, but others may not even be conscious of their need to stray beyond a subset of go-to networks until after they’ve dumped their pay-TV provider.

The presumption underlying OTT also seems to be that a consumers’ list of favorite channels doesn’t change. Negating optionality cuts off subscribers’ ability to even sample a new network that could conceivably become their favorite if they were given a chance.

Remember, watching TruTV for even just a few hours doesn’t just fulfill a one-time need for me to watch basketball; it exposes me to promotion for other programming on the network and opens an opportunity to make TruTV a new favorite. Come for March Madness, stay for “Barmageddon.” (That said, it’s worth noting that both Sling TV and PlayStation Vue offer TruTV).

If and when Apple cracks the OTT market, perhaps it would be shrewd to obtain enough rights to allow its users to sample any channel whenever they wanted, but the free viewing should be available for only one day beyond a certain core group of channels. Watching a channel beyond that core group would require paying an additional surcharge.

Such functionality would occupy a nice middle ground between the skinny bundle and traditional channel package that retains some optionality while turning it into an additional revenue opportunity.

Here’s another idea: Rather than presetting a group of channels into a skinny bundle, let users pick what channels they want from a broader menu of options. Call it the 20/20 package: A subscriber can pick which 20 channels they want from a a broad menu for $20, and can switch up their 20 every month. Want to make a mid-month substitution? Pay a surcharge.

As more market entrants follow in the footsteps of Sony and Dish, they would do well to evolve beyond OTT’s heretofore rigid confines and restore some degree of optionality.

More TV

  • Jody Madden Replaces Craig Rodgerson as

    Jody Madden Replaces Craig Rodgerson as CEO of VFX Firm Foundry

    Jody Madden has been upped to CEO at U.K.-based VFX outfit Foundry. She steps up fromchief product officer and replaces Craig Rodgerson, who joined the company in late 2017. Foundry was bought by U.S. tech firm Roper Technologies earlier this year in a £410 million ($509 million) deal. The London-based business provides software and technology [...]

  • La Linea Invisible

    Mariano Barroso Shoots Basque Conflict Origins Story ‘La Linea Invisible’

    IRUN, Spain  — When- and why – do people begin to kill for a cause? Having created “What the Future Holds,” maybe the best reviewed to date of any Movistar + Original Series, Spain’s Mariano Barroso (“The Wolves of Washington”) tackles this question head on in “La Línea Invisible,” a six-part series, again from Movistar [...]

  • Writers vs Agents Packaging War WGA

    Writers Guild Leaders Warn Members About Contact With Fired Agents

    Leaders of the Writers Guild of America are warning members about being contacted by their former agents — asserting that such efforts are an attempt to undermine the WGA and its members. The missive, sent Tuesday from the WGA negotiating committee, came with the guild in a bitter three-month standoff with talent agents that appears [...]

  • Mike Fleiss

    ‘The Bachelor’ Creator Mike Fleiss Accused of Attacking Wife

    “The Bachelor” and “The Bachelorette” creator Mike Fleiss has been accused of attacking his wife Laura Fleiss at their home in Hawaii on July 4, according to documents obtained by Variety. The documents show that Laura Fleiss, who is currently pregnant, filed for an emergency domestic violence restraining order against her husband after he allegedly [...]

  • James Cordon Drag Race Handmaids Tale

    Emmys Trivia: 20 Surprising Facts From 2019's Nominations

    For a show that technically wasn’t eligible at the Emmy Awards in 2019, “The Handmaid’s Tale” did quite well this year. The Hulu drama picked up 11 nominations, including major ones like outstanding directing, writing, guest actress and guest actor, thanks to a quirk in the TV Academy’s Emmy rules. As previously noted, most of [...]

  • 'Schitt's Creek' Emmy Nominations Give Boost

    'Schitt's Creek' Emmy Nominations Give Boost to Pop's Profile

    The core executive team at Pop TV expected to be disappointed, but they still gathered at the CBS-owned cable channel’s Playa Vista offices early Tuesday morning for the reveal of this year’s Primetime Emmy Awards nominations. They were not disappointed. “Schitt’s Creek,” the quirky comedy series that has punched above its weight for Pop since [...]

  • Beyonce-HOMECOMING-Netflix

    Beyoncé, Sara Bareilles Vie for First Emmys as Ramin Djawadi Looks to Reclaim Throne

    Beyoncé and Sara Bareilles could add Emmy trophies to their awards shelves this year, having been nominated in key music categories Tuesday by the Television Academy. Beyoncé’s “Homecoming” special on Netflix was nominated in six categories, and four of those include a nod for the pop superstar herself. Only one of those is in a [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content