How Google Could Save Glass: Ditch the Camera

There are “no sacred cows” to avoid when Google begins retooling its Glass wearable device, Google executive Tony Fadell reportedly said a few days ago. Fadell, who is better known for the Nest Learning Thermostat, is in charge of turning Glass from a failure that creeped out many to a viable product that could actually be sold to consumers.

We will have to wait to see which cows Fadell is talking about, but here’s one suggestion that could help save Glass: Google needs to ditch the integrated camera.

When Google first launched the Explorer Edition of Glass two years ago, it put a big emphasis on that functionality. Early users of the device were encouraged to share photos and video taken with the camera on social media tagged with #throughglass, and marketing materials regularly highlighted it as a key feature.

The power of Glass, Google wanted us to believe, was in part that you didn’t have to fumble with your phone anymore, but take photos and videos from your point of view at any given second. Promotional photos and videos regularly highlighted the benefits of capturing images of children, which every parent knows don’t always perform as expected when one directly points a camera at them.

Turns out that the ability to trick kids may have not been the best marketing message. Grown-ups didn’t really appreciate the idea that someone could just record them with little to no warning, either. Glass quickly became synonymous with privacy invasions and rude social behavior, leading some to coin the unfortunate term “glasshole” to describe users of the device. And it didn’t exactly help that theaters started to fear a new wave of piracy enabled by Glass video recordings, leading some chains to ban Glass from their premises altogether.

Popular on Variety

The irony of that is that Glass’ camera could have been a lot more invasive. Google purposely banned the the use of real-time facial or voice recognition from Glass. Developers weren’t allowed to build apps that would automatically pull up someone’s name or Facebook profile as soon as a Glass wearer pointed the device’s camera at them.

What was left was a camera that had little benefit, and much worse battery life than mobile-phone cameras, but came with a huge social pricetag. What was creepy about Glass wasn’t the fact that people had small displays in the corner of their eye, but that Glass almost equated looking at something with recording it.

The only logical conclusion for Google is to remove the camera from the consumer product, and instead focus on the added benefits of the display and the power of notifications that can be viewed in the corner of one’s eye. A number of third-party developers have already experimented with bringing notifications for services like Twitter, Facebook or even the New York Times to the device, and Google itself has shown that navigation and other instructional content can be very powerful when consumed with a device that doesn’t force users to look away from where they are going or what they are doing.

In other words: Google Glass should augment reality, not capture it. People won’t have any beef with that.

More Digital

  • Aaron Pedersen (as Jay) & Jada

    Screen Australia Leads Call for Evolution of Industry Funding

    Screen Australia, the country’s federal support body, says the screen entertainment industry needs to come up with new business models in response to changes in audience behavior and the disruptive impact on content financing that has come from streaming. Public support bodies must change their relationships with the industry too, Screen Australia CEO Graeme Mason [...]

  • A-ha!

    'A-ha: The Movie' on 'Take on Me' Band to Receive Worldwide Release (EXCLUSIVE)

    A feature documentary on Norwegian “Take On Me” singers A-ha will receive a worldwide release this November. “A-ha: The Movie,” distributed internationally by Esther van Messel’s First Hand Films, will be broadcast in theaters around the world on Nov. 26, with Germany’s Salzgeber releasing the film locally and First Hand Films handling the release in [...]

  • Vudu

    NBCUniversal in Talks to Buy Walmart's Vudu

    Comcast’s NBCUniversal is looking to add some Vudu into its streaming-video mix. The media conglomerate is in talks to buy Vudu, the Walmart-owned entertainment rental, download and free-streaming service, sources confirm to Variety. It’s unclear what the terms of the pact would be or the timing. News of NBCU’s interest in Vudu was first reported [...]

  • Tubi

    Fox in Talks to Acquire Free-Streaming Service Tubi for Over $500 Million (Report)

    Fox Corp. is in discussions about acquiring Tubi, the ad-supported free streaming service, in a deal worth more than $500 million, according to a Wall Street Journal report citing anonymous sources. With Tubi, Rupert Murdoch’s TV broadcasting and cable company would be adding a dedicated streaming component — offering over 20,000 older TV shows and [...]

  • Zombies 2 Disney Channel

    How Disney Channel's 'Zombies 2' Production Team Made Monsters Kid-Friendly

    Traditionally spooky creatures like zombies and werewolves get the Disney treatment in “Zombies 2,” the follow-up to the 2018 hit TV-movie musical of the same name. While the undead have now assimilated into the community of Seabrook, they’re confronted by a new set of outsiders: werewolves. Milo Manheim and Meg Donnelly return as Zed and [...]

  • Baby Yoda - The Child Animatronic

    Hasbro's Adorable Baby Yoda Animatronic Toy Is Already Sold Out on Disney's Online Store

    The Force remains strong for toys based on Baby Yoda, the breakout star of Disney Plus original series “The Mandalorian.” Less than a day after becoming available for pre-order, Hasbro’s new $59.99 Baby Yoda animatronic toy is no longer available on Disney’s official online store: As of Friday morning, Shop Disney listed it as “sold [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content