×
You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Actors’ Artistry Proves To Be Film Editors’ Toughest Test

It’s no coincidence that nominations for acting and film editing overlap.

When considering this year’s Oscar nominees for film editing, it bears keeping in mind that the precise nature of that achievement is never an easy or obvious one to gauge, or even to discuss. The editor’s alchemy is a largely invisible one, an art by subtraction — dependent on reams of footage we never see, driven as much by emotional impact as by timing and rhythm, and usually aimed at achieving the sort of visual seamlessness that can too easily be taken for granted. The better it is, so the conventional wisdom goes, the less you notice.

SEE ALSO: Visual Effects, Sound and Editing Oscar Nominees: Four Memorable Scenes

Ironically, this may partly account for why Douglas Crise and Stephen Mirrione’s inventive work on “Birdman,” with its cunningly achieved illusion of having been shot in one long, wound up omitted from this year’s nominations. Even so, Alejandro G. Inarritu’s technical tour de force offers a useful reminder that just because a picture doesn’t look edited doesn’t mean that it wasn’t. As it happens, Crise and Mirrione were Oscar-nominated for Inarritu’s much more flashily edited 2006 picture, “Babel” — a worthy recognition, to be sure, though more for the strength of that film’s performances and its long-arc emotional progression than for its convulsive leaps through time and space, nearly all of which were set forth in Guillermo Arriaga’s screenplay.

Something similar could be said of Clint Eastwood’s “American Sniper,” which opens with perhaps its showiest cut — from the tense image of Navy SEAL Chris Kyle on an Iraq rooftop to the sight of a young Kyle hunting with his father decades earlier — a deliberately jarring temporal transition that comes straight from Jason Hall’s otherwise doggedly linear script. The true measure of editors Joel Cox and Gary Roach’s achievement is a subtler one, evident in the coherence of Bradley Cooper’s lead performance, the energy and clarity of the action scenes, and the slow, steady accretion of moments into a full-bodied (if far from comprehensive) portrait of one man’s harrowing existence.

Another life-spanning portrait of an exceptional individual, “The Imitation Game” accesses Alan Turing’s formative moments through a more intricate network of flashbacks, and editor William Goldenberg renders the transitions with the sort of crisp, polished ease that defines Morten Tyldum’s picture as a whole. But beyond the occasional blips of historical newsreel footage and the process-driven montages, Goldenberg’s work is perhaps best appreciated in the assembly of the film’s outstanding lead performance; we’ll never know exactly how many different versions of Benedict Cumberbatch’s icy stare the editor had to work with, but the role’s emotional impact, despite its tightly constricted range, largely speaks for itself.

As many a cutting-room veteran will tell you, the ability to shape a performance presents perhaps the truest test of a film editor’s skill. As it happens, four of this year’s five editing nominees also received nominations for acting — and the one that didn’t, “The Grand Budapest Hotel,” arguably should have for Ralph Fiennes’ bravura display of controlled comic fireworks. Remarkably, given Wes Anderson’s obsessive attention to matters of timing and rhythm (crucial for an ensemble farce like this to work), this is the first of the director’s pictures to earn recognition in this category, and if ever there was a need for proof that great editing is allowed to call attention to itself, Barney Pilling’s work offers it in spades.

The style here is presentational rather than immersive, full of frequent shot-reverse-shot transitions between perfectly symmetrical frames, and often employing playful shifts in perspective that call attention to the candied-diorama artifice of the film’s world. Anderson, who works out his compositions and camera movements beforehand, isn’t a director who offers much breathing room; even still, Pilling’s shot selection process, in search of the cleanest blocking, the best line deliveries and the strongest comic interplay between actors, must have been killer.

Of all the nominees, Damien Chazelle’s “Whiplash” is the most narrowly focused, and the most tightly circumscribed in terms of time and space; a few peripheral characters aside, it’s effectively a two-hander, which sets a logical back-and-forth pattern for Tom Cross’ editing scheme. The most memorable sequences in “Whiplash” consist of simple yet perfectly timed reversals between J.K. Simmons’ barking orchestra leader and Miles Teller’s desperate-to-please drummer, in which the actors’ gestures often dictate the exact placement of each cut. At the same time, Cross’ cutting derives terrific energy from the natural percussion supplied by the jazz music with which it works so inextricably in concert.

By contrast, the most expansive film of the bunch is “Boyhood,” and if there’s a contender this year that confounds most traditional ideas of editing a movie, it’s this one. Whereas most editors work from the template of a finished script, Sandra Adair was no more aware of which direction the 12-year project would take than Richard Linklater was, allowing her an unprecedented level of freedom to experiment while considerably raising the degree of difficulty.

The editorial virtues of “Boyhood” are plain to see — namely, the absorbing narrative flow and performances that feel cohesive from start to finish — but they’re especially remarkable when you consider the additional variables and levels of uncertainty introduced by a real-time experiment. All of which makes the modesty of Adair’s approach — especially the tactful, almost imperceptible transitions from one year to the next — all the more becoming. Great editing isn’t always invisible editing, but in this case the two are one and the same.

Popular on Variety

More Artisans

  • Advanced Imaging Society Honors 10 Women

    AIS Honors 10 Women in Tech

    Celebrating 10 years of achievement in entertainment technology, the Advanced Imaging Society today named 10 female industry innovators who will receive the organization’s 2019 Distinguished Leadership Awards at the its 10th annual Entertainment Technology Awards ceremony on October 28 in Beverly Hills. The individuals were selected by an awards committee for being significant “entertainment industry [...]

  • Will Smith Gemini Man Special Effects

    How the 'Gemini Man' VFX Team Digitally Created a Younger Version of Will Smith

    More human than human — yes, that’s a “Blade Runner” reference — yet it sounds like an unattainable standard when it comes to creating believable, photorealistic, digital human characters. But the visual effects team on Ang Lee’s “Gemini Man” set its sights on something even more difficult: creating a digital version of young Will Smith [...]

  • Jest to Impress Cartoon Network Virtual

    New In-House VR Program Helps Cartoon Network Artists Add a Virtual Dimension

    Teams of animators and artists from across Cartoon Network’s numerous properties are getting the chance to expand into virtual reality storytelling via the company’s pilot program, Journeys VR. The work of the first three teams — including experiences based on action, nature and comedy — was unveiled to global audiences Oct. 1 on Steam and [...]

  • Frozen 2

    How the 'Frozen II' Artists Created Believable Emotion Through Animation

    “The more believable you can make the character [look], the more people believe how [it’s] feeling,” says Tony Smeed, who, with Becky Bresee, shared the challenge of heading animation on Disney’s highly anticipated “Frozen II.” “Emotion comes from inside and manifests itself into actions and facial expressions. Anything beyond that is movement for the sake [...]

  • Lucy in the Sky BTS

    'Lucy in the Sky' DP Shifts Frame to Show Inner Turmoil of Natalie Portman's Astronaut

    What drew cinematographer Polly Morgan to “Lucy in the Sky” was how Noah Hawley’s script so clearly illuminated the emotional breakdown of astronaut Lucy Cola (Natalie Portman) in a way that felt very insular: The visual cues were on the page — and conveyed an unusual approach to charting the character’s journey. “When things fall [...]

  • NICKI LEDERMAN and JOAQUIN PHOENIX Joker

    How Makeup, Hair and Costume Team Gave 'Joker' a New Look for Origin Story

    “We’re not in the superhero world,” says Nicki Ledermann, makeup head on Todd Phillips’ “Joker,” which reimagines the iconic comic book villain’s origin in an acclaimed performance from Joaquin Phoenix. “This story is treated as real life, and that’s what made the project so interesting.” In this most recent take on Batman’s nemesis — a [...]

  • Exceptional Minds VFX Autism Training

    VES Honoree Susan Zwerman Trains People on the Autism Spectrum for Film, TV Jobs

    Most of those who have earned the honor of VES Fellow in the past decade have been recognized by the Visual Effects Society for on-screen innovation. But this year’s honoree, Susan Zwerman, is equally distinguished by her off-screen accomplishments. Zwerman is the studio executive producer for Exceptional Minds, a visual effects and animation school for [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content