×
You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Visual Effects Awards Category Faces Identity Crisis

Effects are now so ubiquitous, it can be argued, that they deserve more than a single trophy

After decades of struggle, visual effects seem to have achieved a measure of respect. There are five vfx nominees at the Oscars. The VES Awards are taken pretty seriously. The BAFTAs give a visual effects award.

Farewell to the kids’ table, vfx pros. You’ve arrived. That’s the good news.

The bad news? It’s time to blow up the visual effects category. It should cease to be, shuffle off this mortal coil, join the choir invisible. It should be an ex-category.

SEE ALSO: Want Better Oscar Ratings? Play Up Visual Effects.

“But why?,” you cry. Visual effects have never been more important and the artistry of the vfx craft has never been more appreciated. How can we call the whole thing off now, just when things are getting good?

Because the very idea of a visual-effects category has become not just meaningless, but downright misleading.

Visual effects now comprise so many things that the category might just as well be called “stuff we see on the screen.” Pretty much anything on the screen is being done with visual effects. Need images of World War II for “The Imitation Game” and “Unbroken”? Visual effects. A fairy tale world for “Maleficent”? That’s vfx. Giant sets? Historical landscapes? Yup. Pyro in “Transformers: Age of Extinction” and miniatures in “Interstellar”? Come on in! “Avatar,” “Life of Pi” and “Gravity” all won Oscars for cinematography that was mostly realized by digital vfx, not with photography.

The all-green banners of vfx protests, proclaiming “your movie without vfx,” are quite on-target.

Lumping all that together as visual effects is like having one category for design, with d.p.’s, production designers and costume designers competing for a single award. It minimizes the contributions of some artists, exaggerates the importance of others, and perpetuates prejudices the entertainment industry must shed if its valuable awards franchises are going to keep their relevance — and their value.

Until recently the one thing that was reliably not a visual effect was acting. Now, though, digital characters can be the most interesting thing in a film. In “Guardians of the Galaxy” (pictured), a film full of satisfying performances, the animated Rocket and Groot are the money. The performance capture apes of “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes” are the film’s most compelling characters.

Performers need not worry that they’ll be eclipsed, though. In “Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb,” a slew of gifted comics manage to share the screen with CG dinosaur skeletons and the like, and they get their laughs. It’s a style of filmmaking that harkens back to Abbott & Costello, and it’s only getting better as the technology improves. And it’s the only contender this year that mostly goes for laughs.

The traditional approach to vfx lives on in other films and genres, too. “Godzilla” is an old-fashioned monster movie, in which the monsters are the stars and people are a necessary distraction. In “Interstellar,” vfx provide the futuristic spaceships and robots, the black hole and the wormhole, all rendered with a matter-of-fact naturalism. But that is just the setting in which the actors are meant to shine. Both films could have been written and made in the 1970s, though with lesser visuals.

“X-Men: Days of Future Past” uses vfx to paint an apocalyptic future and display superhero powers and battles, but its vfx are arguably most notable for their loving re-creation of the 1970s. Then there are the fantasy worlds of “The Hobbit” and “Maleficent.” Before the age of digital vfx, those two films could only have been made as animated features. They have digital characters, digitally enhanced characters, digital cinematography, digital design. Again, in those films, visual effects means “what you see on screen.”

I realize that visual effects aren’t going to get multiple categories quickly. I’m not even sure what the best split would be. (Supporting vfx, as at the VES? Or separate awards for fantasy pictures, as some of the guilds have?) But there are four Oscars for acting, two for writing, two for sound. Visual effects are now as diverse as any of those crafts. Awards that favor analog artisans and minimize the work of digital artists will eventually become irrelevant, or worse, ridiculous, and that in turn would be bad for the guilds, honorary societies and Academies that bestow them.

So now that the visual effects award is really, truly here, let’s celebrate how important vfx really are, and dump it.

More Artisans

  • The Old Man and the Gun

    Ohio’s Midwest Locations and Flexible Tax Credit Lure Producers

    With its small towns, rolling farmlands and industrial cities, Ohio embodies the American Midwest. Other location lures for filmmakers include the shore along Lake Erie, the campus of Ohio State University, the striking skyline of Cincinnati and the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame in Cleveland. The Buckeye State also provides producers with a 30% [...]

  • Nancy Schreiber Mapplethorpe Cinematographer

    DP Nancy Schreiber Captures Life of Artist Robert Mapplethorpe in Grimy Gotham

    Don’t tell cinematographer Nancy Schreiber that she’s having a renaissance. That would imply there’ve been slumps in her long career, and she won’t have any of that, even if for a time she was taking smaller jobs as the gaps widened between larger gigs. “It’s never been about the money, for me,” says Schreiber over [...]

  • What Ariana Grande, Lady Gaga Share:

    LeRoy Bennett Keeps Top Acts Like Lady Gaga, Ariana Grande in the Spotlight

    You might say that LeRoy Bennett is a shining light among lighting and production designers for pop music. Doing double duty creating both touring sets and their illumination, he started out with a 14-year run as Prince’s collaborator, went on to work with Nine Inch Nails and Madonna and has counted Beyoncé’s and Bruno Mars’ [...]

  • Us Movie

    How 'Us' Pulled Off Subtle Differences in Costumes, Design, Music for Parallel Characters

    “Us,” Jordan Peele’s second outing as a director, following his 2017 critical and box office success “Get Out,” revisits similar psychological horror-thriller territory. But this time the stakes are, well, doubled.  In the new film, to be released by Universal on March 21, Adelaide Wilson, played by Lupita Nyong’o, returns to her childhood beachside home [...]

  • Ben Davis Cinematographer Captain Marvel Brie

    Cinematographer Ben Davis Helps Create the Look of the Marvel Cinematic Universe

    Since 2008’s “Iron Man,” the Marvel cinematic universe has continued expanding, now numbering more than 20 films. Along the way, the company has developed a reputation for solid technology choices with the large-format ARRI Alexa 65 camera and the Codex Vault 65 on-set media management system as cornerstones of its workflow. Earlier in the series, [...]

  • Costume Designer Betty Pecha Madden on

    Betty Pecha Madden Looks Back on Four Decades of Costume Design

    Dressing dolls as a child at her parents’ Wisconsin farm, future costume designer Betty Pecha Madden created stories using clothes. By age 17, her interest in costuming having grown serious via high school plays, she left home upon graduation and went to Chicago to find work in the industry. Madden clothed rock groups and college [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content