×

Film Review: ‘A Field in England’

A defiantly unclassifiable cross-genre experiment that simultaneously reinvents and regurgitates low-budget British cinema as it goes.

With:

Julian Barratt, Peter Ferdinando, Richard Glover, Ryan Pope, Reece Shearsmith, Michael Smiley.

No two people who see “A Field in England” will agree upon what happens in the godforsaken clearing where helmer Ben Wheatley’s latest mind-bender takes place — a phenomenon that is both testament to Wheatley’s imagination-teasing ingenuity (the freakiest moments are those you don’t see) and byproduct of a startling lapse in basic storytelling competence. Brazenly rendered in black-and-white, and set against the creaky backdrop of the English Civil War, this defiantly unclassifiable cross-genre experiment blends elements of Sartrean soul-searching, Tigon-style folk horror and late-’60s psychedelia, an acquired-taste offering that simultaneously reinvents and regurgitates low-budget British cinema as it goes.

Though rapturously received by the London critics, who’ve rightly anointed Wheatley Brit film’s most dynamic new talent, this perplexing and ultimately tough-to-export project challenges not only existing narrative forms but also traditional means of distribution in the U.K., rolling out July 5 in theaters, on demand and via homevid and Film4’s free-TV formats, ensuring a quick flash of broad exposure on its home turf. Domestically, Drafthouse Films will have a far trickier time when it releases “Field” in the U.S. next year, since the most receptive potential viewers will have already sampled it via illegal means.

In what amounts to a battle of wills between five deserters who must also contend with supernatural forces, Wheatley extends the low-budget approach of “Kill List” and “Sightseers” (“Field” was reportedly shot for £300,000 over 12 days), while amplifying his pitch-black sense of humor and overt refusal to conform to well-laid genre conventions. Clearly, Wheatley is bored with the paint-by-numbers approach of his horror contemporaries, but has swung so far in the opposite direction here, the result feels almost amateurishly avant garde at times, guilty of the sort of indulgences one barely tolerates in student films.

Popular on Variety

The film opens with a warning of “flashing images and stroboscopic sequences” to come, and it achieves its stylistic apotheosis during the trippy interlude. After the characters have gorged themselves on wild mushrooms, Wheatley and writer/co-editor Amy Jump (also his wife) hypnotize the audience by cutting back and forth between shots of the various characters, folding and mirroring the images into disconcerting hallucinations (reminiscent of the symmetric tintype mutants Mark Mothersbaugh explores in his art).

Such tricks provide novelty value, but a gaping vacuum still looms where conventional narrative might go — not unlike the ominous dark star that appears above the field at one point. Although Wheatley and Jump have gotten away with eliminating exposition and traditional character detail in the past, it’s frustratingly difficult to follow what this motley group is searching for, much less to distinguish between the various personalities (unless one recognizes the actors from their previous cult film and TV credits).

Some of the characters have been lifted directly from other low-budget British movies. As the sadistic Irish necromancer O’Neill, Michael Smiley openly channels Vincent Price’s wicked turn in “Witchfinder General,” for example. Others appear redundantly clownish, buffoonishly preoccupied with getting drunk and/or scratching their private parts, but could be less confusing to Blighty auds familiar with the class caricatures they represent. The fellow who leaves the strongest impression is Whitehead (“The League of Gentlemen’s” Reece Shearsmith), an alchemist’s assistant whose loyalty to his offscreen master backfires in ways his piercing one-minute-long scream only begins to suggest — and the film pointedly refuses to reveal.

Stylistically, this unique undertaking is a mixed bag, alternately casual and contrived, graphically brutal and maddeningly obtuse. Occasionally, the action freezes in striking tableaux vivants, as the cast hold poses suggested by classical paintings; elsewhere, they come off as bumbling Civil War reenactors, blending Ye Olde vernacular with salty modern expressions. Peculiar as it all is to process, the experience feels quite unlike anything else, as if Wheatley is reaching for new devices with which to frighten his decidedly jaded audience.

The commitment to monochrome brings out a beauty largely absent in previous collaborations with d.p. Laurie Rose, though his handheld style and axis-breaking setups often disorient — and not necessarily in ways that help the psychic imbalance the pic means to achieve. The black-and-white lensing also serves to advance another low-budget British cinema tradition, evoking scrappy period pics by Peter Watkins (“Culloden”) and Kevin Brownlow (“Winstanley”), rendered fiendishly diabolical in Wheatley’s hands.

Though the team easily might have broadened the pic’s appeal by transposing their peculiar tale to a post-apocalyptic context (changing only the costumes in the process), the historical setting nicely emphasizes its undercurrents of sorcery and the dark arts. This occult dynamic is alluded to at points, but mostly left to the imagination. At times, it seems that literally anything could happen, and those who take most keenly to the film will be those who fill its gaps with vivid horrors of their own invention.

Film Review: 'A Field in England'

Reviewed online, June 11, 2013. (Also in Karlovy Vary Film Festival — competing.) Running time: 90 MIN.

Production:

(U.K.)  A Drafthouse Films (in U.S.) release of a Film4 presentation of a Rook Films production. (International sales: Protagonist Pictures, London.) Produced by Claire Jones, Andy Starke. Executive producer, Anna Higgs.

Crew:

Directed by Ben Wheatley. Screenplay, Amy Jump. Camera (B&W, widescreen), Laurie Rose; editors, Jump, Wheatley; music, Jim Williams; production designer, Andy Kelly; costume designer, Emma Fryer; sound, Rob Entwistle; sound design, Martin Pavey; special effects supervisor, Mark Holt; visual effects, Electric Theatre Collective; stunt coordinator, Glenn Marks; assistant director, James Sharpe.

With:

Julian Barratt, Peter Ferdinando, Richard Glover, Ryan Pope, Reece Shearsmith, Michael Smiley.

More Film

  • Emerald Run

    'Emerald Run': Film Review

    “Emerald Run” is one of the weirdest hodgepodges to make its way to theater screens and digital platforms in quite some time. Unfortunately, oddness is just about the only thing this muddled little indie has going for it. Despite the game efforts of lead actor David Chokachi and attractive lensing by DP Michael Caradonna, the [...]

  • The Call of the Wild

    Box Office: 'Call of the Wild' in Surprisingly Tight Race With 'Sonic the Hedgehog'

    “The Call of the Wild” and “Sonic the Hedgehog” are in a tight race for first place at North American multiplexes, with as much as $27 million each, early estimates showed on Friday. Disney-20th Century’s launch of Harrison Ford’s “The Call of the Wild” is coming in well above pre-release forecasts, which had been in [...]

  • Hidden Away

    'Hidden Away': Film Review

    Antonio Ligabue holds an unusual place in the annals of mid-20th-century Italian art, championed by those who feel his boldly-colored, largely naive paintings are the product of a self-taught artist whose mental incapacities prove that natural spirit transcends training and intellect when wielding a paint brush. Wherever one falls on Ligabue’s talents, making a film [...]

  • The Intruder

    'The Intruder': Film Review

    Take two parts De Palma, one part Zulawski, four parts “Berberian Sound Studio” and dissolve the whole in about a million parts water, and the resultant dilute solution might approximate “The Intruder,” an oddly flavorless supernatural psycho-thriller from sophomore Argentinian director Natalia Meta. The claustrophobically close-up tale of a woman’s mental unraveling in the wake [...]

  • Matthew A Cherry Hair Love NAACP

    Lead Category in NAACP Image Awards Reflects Spike in Diversity and Artistic Caliber

    To best appreciate the competitiveness and quality of the outstanding motion picture nominees for the 51st NAACP Image Awards, which takes place on Feb. 22, check the numbers. All five of this year’s nominees — “Dolemite Is My Name” “Just Mercy” “Harriet” “Queen & Slim” and “Us” — scored well on Rotten Tomatoes. To wit, [...]

  • Mogul Mowgli

    'Mogul Mowgli': Film Review

    The last time festival audiences saw Riz Ahmed on screen, he was tearing it up on stage as a hedonistic hard-rocker before being plunged into emotional freefall by disability. As an American drummer slowly accepting the loss of his hearing in “Sound of Metal,” the British-Pakistani actor elucidated that painful arc with such furious, void-staring [...]

  • Mimamata

    'Minamata': Film Review

    If it weren’t for the work he’d done in the Japanese fishing village of Minamata, W. Eugene Smith’s legacy would likely be that of a war photographer, or else as one of the leading contributors to Life magazine, whose immersive approach to his subjects helped pioneer the concept of the photo essay. But Smith did [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content