Why Neill Blomkamp Is The Wrong Fit For Franchises

Helmer's blend of issues and action doesn't fit franchises

With the sleeper hit “District 9” behind him and “Elysium” coming up, Neill Blomkamp seems to have acquired the perfect cachet to take on a franchise tentpole. His stories have a strong social conscience combined with exciting action and visual flair. He hits the sweet spot where serious meets fun.

That inspired speculation he’d take on a studio franchise, especially “Star Trek.” His resume, after all, seemed especially perfect for “Star Trek,” which has such earnest roots.  Yet Blomkamp recently told Filmz, a Danish website, he wouldn’t do the next “Star Trek” movie. (Update: Paramount says Blomkamp was never offered the next “Star Trek” picture.)  Though he was a fan of “Star Trek: The Next Generation,” he said, he didn’t want to deal with the politics of a franchise feature. “Would I be able to make the’ Star Trek’-film I want? Probably not, and therefore I have no desire to make it.”

Fans may be disappointed, but Blomkamp made the right decision. He’d actually be an awkward fit with Gene Roddenberry’s earnest sci-fi legacy, and he seems to know it. His approach to science fiction is too personal.

First, there’s the basic matter of creative control. A franchise installment for “Star Trek,” superheroes and “Star Wars” must must generate toys, games and lunchboxes. That means the studio’s licensing and marketing people are never far removed from decisions about design and story. For many directors, that would be a happy trade-off. Blomkamp doesn’t seem to be one of them.

“I’ve seen some insane, absolute dream projects come across his table,”  “District 9” and “Elysium” cinematographer Trent Opaloch, a longtime Blomkamp collaborator, told Variety. “Studios that have thrown this stuff at him, huge opportunities,” says Opaloch. “It’s just not his thing.  He’s not interested so much in the ‘Star Wars.’ … With Neill, knowing him as I do, the default (answer) is ‘No, why would I do that?’ He’s got a channel for telling his own stories with his own characters. And that’s just who he is as a person. I think that’s really really cool. It’s pretty inspiring, actually.”

Second, while Blomkamp’s mix of issues and action seems just right for Capt. Kirk & Co., there are some crucial differences. “Star Trek” has always been a mix of pulpy sci-fi (ray guns, telepathy, green-skinned alien seductresses) and earnest social commentary. Roddenberry created the original series because TV censors of the the 1960s wouldn’t let him write about burning social issues in contemporary-set dramas unless he set his stories in the 23rd century.

Even the movies carried that issue-orientation forward. Wags labeled “Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home” as “Star Trek saves the whales,” and the original cast’s finale, “Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country,” amounted to our heroes emracing Gorbachev and the reformers in the Soviet Union. While such social commentary was missing in J.J. Abrams “Star Trek” feature reboot, it was present in “Star Trek Into Darkness,” which tackled the issue of assassination by drone.

In “Elysium,” Blomkamp envisions 2154 as a time when the haves live in luxury far above the Earth while the have-nots live in misery on the surface below, a premise that even echoes a 1969 “Star Trek” episode. With “District 9” and now “Elysium” he has bolstered sci-fi’s social conscience while avoiding “Star Trek’s” preachiness. But he arrives at his stories by a different route. He says he doesn’t plan a movie about this issue or that issue, the way a TV writing staff might. He writes about the topics that interest him “for whatever reason,” he says. “It can be totally unrelated to film. I don’t go about trying to inject socially relevant stuff into the stories. It just seems to naturally happen.”

Then there’s the balance of issues and action. Blomkamp has a knack for making thought-provoking popcorn movies. He likes”cars exploding and gunfire” as much as anybody. “Those are ingredients that when I was a kid, I wanted to get into cinema,” he said.  That leaves him constantly choosing between two sides of his nature. “When the ‘science fiction’ outweighs that portrayal of contemporary life through a different lens and you’re doing it for the sake of science fiction, then for this particular film, it’s wrong,” he says. “That’s what I was constantly balancing. You know, where this science fiction, R-rated, shit-blows-up filmmaker wants to go right, but the allegory needs to turn left. Those were the decisions where it was like, ‘I really want to do this, but will I lose the audience because now you’re making something that’s not grounded,’ you know? That’s what I was dealing with.” In “Elysium,” the allegory won out.  On a studio tentpole, he’d be under enormous pressure to favor action.

Finally, there’s a crucial difference between “Star Trek” and Blomkamp’s science fiction:  Blomkamp writes about a future where the social ills of present-day Earth are exaggerated; that’s how he shines a light on today’s issues. “Star Trek” imagines a future where Earth is a utopia; it’s the aliens and off-world colonies who have the social ills. “Star Trek” was also quick to serve up pat prescriptions for those social ills. Blomkamp doesn’t. Though Variety critic Scott Foundas wrote “‘Elysium’ offers “one of the more openly socialist political agendas of any Hollywood movie in memory, beating the drum loudly not just for universal healthcare, but for open borders, unconditional amnesty and the abolition of class distinctions,”  Blomkamp himself says “I genuinely am not sure if ‘Elysium’ has a message.

“These are observations of mine in a highly complex world that has proven to be unable to solve these problems, going back to Mesopotamia,” he said. “It’s just human nature. So these are my observations with a science fiction filter over them. I think for a message, you have to be able to provide an answer. It’s kind of like saying, ‘Do this,’ or ‘Think of it this way.’ I just simply don’t have the ability or the information to do that. I don’t have an answer. And I think if you don’t have an answer, all you can do is show the audience contemporary life on earth from a different perspective.

“I think that filmmakers that really think that they have a message and they think that they’re going to change the world are sorely mistaken,” he says. That, more than anything else, probably makes him the wrong man for “Star Trek.”

So let’s not lament Blomkamp’s decision to board the Enterprise. He’s building his own legacy, his own way, and we can all look forward to what he does next. Even if it doesn’t inspire lunchboxes.

Popular on Variety

More Film

  • Matthew Modine

    Supporters Back Matthew Modine After Clumsy Joke at SAG-AFTRA Meeting

    More than 100 women, including Ellen Barkin and Allison Janney, have voiced support for Matthew Modine’s campaign for SAG-AFTRA presidency, following a joke at a SAG-AFTRA meeting that some decried as misogynist. With voting set to conclude on Aug. 28, the campaigns have featured vitriolic attacks between supporters of Modine, secretary-treasurer Jane Austin and incumbent [...]

  • Lady Gaga

    Variety Earns 14 Folio: Eddie & Ozzie Award Nominations

    Variety has received 14 Folio: Eddie & Ozzie award nominations for its coverage of the entertainment industry over the past year. The awards gala, which will take place at The Hilton Midtown in New York City on Oct. 30, celebrates publications that have demonstrated impressive investigative journalism, in addition to thoughtful digital and print design. [...]

  • WGA Agents Packaging Fight Placeholder

    Writers Guild Withdraws State Suit Against Agencies, Refiles in Federal Court

    The Writers Guild of America has withdrawn its state court suit against WME, CAA, UTA and ICM Partners alleging packaging fees are illegal and re-filed suit in federal court. The WGA also responded to antitrust claims brought against the guild by the three agencies. Those agency suits alleged that the WGA abused its power in [...]

  • Tim Roth to Receive Honorary Heart

    Tim Roth to Receive Honorary Heart of Sarajevo Award

    British actor Tim Roth is to receive the Honorary Heart of Sarajevo Award in recognition of his “exceptional contribution to the art of film.” The ceremony at the Sarajevo Film Festival will be held on Tuesday. He will hold a masterclass on the same day. His first screen role was the lead in the controversial [...]

  • Isabelle Huppert, receives the Honorary Heart

    Isabelle Huppert on Fateful Encounters, the Nature of Acting and Judging a Good Script

    Celebrated actress Isabelle Huppert, speaking at the Sarajevo Film Festival on Sunday, looked back on her illustrious career in a candid discussion that touched on her acting, the many renowned directors with whom she’s worked, and the importance of dialogue. The festival honored Huppert with its Honorary Heart of Sarajevo award “in recognition of her [...]

  • Inauguracion SANFIC 2019

    15th Sanfic Touts Attendance Rise, Hosts Gael Garcia Bernal, Wagner Moura

    SANTIAGO — Chile’s Santiago International Film Festival (Sanfic) launched its 15th edition Sunday Aug. 18 with three of Latin America’s best-known actors, Gael Garcia Bernal, Wagner Moura (“Narcos”) and Graciela Borges (“La Cienaga”), to which it bestowed career recognition awards. “It’s been 15 years in which we have presented more than 1,400 films,” noted Francisca [...]

  • Sarajevo, Intl. Casting Directors Network Look

    Sarajevo Film Festival and International Casting Directors Network Look to Launch Local Stars

    The Intl. Casting Directors Network (ICDN) and the Sarajevo Film Festival are joining forces to turn the popular Bosnian film fest into a springboard for regional actors looking to launch international careers. After kicking off with a pilot version last year, the initiative expanded to include a series of masterclasses with leading casting directors and [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content