×

Why Awards Season Is Worth the Slog

Variety's awards guru basks in the warmth of statuette fever

We’ve survived four months of a frenzied awards season, with only three months to go. Did I hear someone groan? Stop it right now. You can either enjoy it or, as the Brits said in WWII, keep calm and carry on.

I actually like awards and kudos season, because it’s all of showbiz in a condensed form (well, if you consider a seven-month slog to be “condensed”). Awards are what showbiz is all about: artistry, marketing, ego and money. If you’re in the right mood, it’s goofy fun.

SEE ALSO: Death to All Awards Shows!

And don’t worry, I’m not that sappy. I will have another column talking about what I don’t like about awards season. But Harlan Ellison is so eloquent and withering in his assessment, we thought it would be fair and balanced, as they say, to provide a little counterpoint.

One of the main reasons I like awards: They are a time capsule of tastes and moods. For better and for worse, pop culture reflects the world, and awards pinpoint that fact. “The Greatest Show on Earth” wouldn’t even get made today, much less win the best picture Oscar. Some of the winners of the past have dated badly, yet others hold up well. “Vertigo” and “The Honeymooners” didn’t win much, but “Lawrence of Arabia” and “I Love Lucy” did, and they show the sensibility of the era.

I also like awards because they put a spotlight on some amazing work. As a culture, we are over-entertained, with diversions available to us 24/7. But awards are a way of sending a signal, saying, “Here’s something worth seeing.”

And awards are like a personal Rorschach test: Tell me who you’re rooting for, and I’ll tell you who you are. It’s a clue to your personality, whether last year you favored “Amour” or “Argo” or “Life of Pi.” What’s your favorite TV series, “Homeland” or “Sons of Anarchy”?

I even enjoy the campaigning. Yes, Variety makes some money off it, but so do numerous other outlets, so that’s not why I like it. Campaigns have given me the opportunity to meet some amazing people people: to name a few, Julie Christie, James Cameron, John Irving and Ben Sliney. (If the last name doesn’t ring a bell, he was the Federal Aviation Administration national operations manager who played himself in “United 93”; his first day on the job was 9/11 and he made the decision to stop all planes from using U.S. airspace.) All of these people are as impressive as you would hope.

After covering awards for so long, however, I worry that my level of geekiness is out of control. I can rattle off Oscar’s five best picture contenders of 1998, but I’ve forgotten America’s 13 original colonies. I know how many Emmy noms Ray Romano received, yet I can’t remember how the Electoral College works. I’m like a Rain Man of the kudos world. (“Rain Man,” 1988, eight Oscar noms, four wins. I told you I’m a geek.)

There is something bogus about any showbiz prize; by definition, there can be no “best.” One can measure a shot put or a pole vault, but you can’t measure artistry. But awards season is a reminder that it’s not only about results, it’s about the journey. And that’s the final reason I like awards: They’re so zen!

Popular on Variety

More Voices

  • "The Stockholm Syndrome" - Pictured: Rajesh

    Emmys: Is It Time to Give Multicams Their Own Category? (Column)

    The question of whether multi-camera sitcoms are a dying breed isn’t a new one. The few remaining purveyors of the format, including “The Big Bang Theory” executive producer Chuck Lorre, have been asked that question for years. But even as Lorre ventures into the single-camera world with such shows as the Golden Globe-winning “The Kominsky [...]

  • Veep HBO

    Celebrating Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Emmy's Comedy Queen (Column)

    Let’s take a moment to give Julia Louis-Dreyfus some much-deserved praise. As HBO’s “Veep” ends its run — and aims to add a coda to its already amazing haul over the years at the Emmys — the actress is poised to make history one more time this September. All signs point to another win in [...]

  • Emma Watson MTV Movie Awards

    It's Time for the Emmys to Eliminate Gender-Specific Acting Categories (Column)

    As TV and storytelling continue to evolve, does it still make sense to silo male and female performers into separate Emmy categories? Splitting up “outstanding actor” and “outstanding actress” awards as if they’re different skill sets seems like an outdated practice — yet combining them, and eliminating half of the key acting Emmys in the [...]

  • The Good Place NBC

    Broadcasters Committed to Emmy Telecast Despite Cable, Streaming Dominance (Column)

    Here’s what you won’t see much of at the Primetime Emmy Awards on Fox: Fox.  It’s Fox’s turn to telecast the ceremony, yet it’s a somewhat bittersweet affair for the network, which only landed 18 nominations this year. That means few Fox stars will even be in attendance at the Microsoft Theater, let alone onstage, [...]

  • Eugene Levy Schitts Creek

    Emmy Nods to Veteran Actors Prove Importance of Longevity (Column)

    Despite some well-documented snubs, Television Academy members did a great job with this year’s Emmy nominations when it came to recognizing new series, such as FX’s “Pose” and Netflix’s “Russian Doll,” as well as rising talent including Anthony Carrigan (HBO’s “Barry”), Joey King (Hulu’s “The Act”) and Billy Porter (“Pose”). That spotlight on fresh series [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content