“This Court concludes that the Copyright Act forbids FilmOn X from retransmitting Plaintiffs’ copyrighted programs over the Internet,” U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer wrote in the decision granting TV broadcasters’ motion for a preliminary injunction.
The decision — which applies nationwide — has implications for Aereo, a similar Internet streaming service sued by broadcasters. New York-based Aereo, whose backers include IAC chairman Barry Diller, has won legal victories against broadcasters in New York federal courts, including a decision in July by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals denying the request by TV networks to shut down the service.
In a statement, Fox said, “We are pleased, but not surprised, that that the court recognized that the commercial retransmission of our broadcast signal without permission or compensation is a clear violation of the law. This decision should finally put the matter to rest, and will hopefully discourage other illegal services from attempting to steal our content.”
Alki David, CEO of FilmOn, said in an email to Variety that he planned to appeal the decision.
“The judge is clearly in (the broadcasters’) pockets,” David wrote. “From the day they filed in DC I suspected they had influence in the courts there. There is something so very rotten in corporate America and it makes me sad. Anyway… I’m on my yacht in (the) Mediterranean at the moment so they can kiss my hairy Greek ass. This is just a temporary setback we will win on appeal.”
In December 2012, U.S. District Judge George Wu granted an injunction preventing FilmOn (previously known as “Aereokiller”) from transmitting the station signals in California and other states, although he refused to extend the ban nationwide. In his decision, Wu ruled that what FilmOn was doing was a public performance, even if there were one-to-one transmissions to private homes.
Both Aereo and FilmOn have argued that their services are legal because they use discrete, individual antennas dedicated to specific users. The companies say they are effectively renting access to antennas, while customers control the tuning and recording.
But Judge Collyer disagreed with that line of argument.
“This system, through which any member of the public who clicks on the link for the video feed, is hardly akin to an individual user stringing up a television antenna on the roof,” she wrote in the decision. “FilmOn X, which is a commercial service retransmitting Plaintiffs’ television performances, is in no meaningful way different from cable television companies, whose relationship with broadcasters such as Plaintiffs was the primary motivation for the 1976 (Copyright) Act’s enactment.”