Olbermann’s on the Right Side in Current Clash

Given where they stand politically, my guess is Keith Olbermann and Glenn Beck would both hate being compared to each other, but the parallels are hard to ignore: Guys with big egos and loyal followings who Olbermannshrunk their platforms — and thus the reach of their voices — by being unable to get along with the cable news network that employed them.

Still, following Olbermann’s present dispute with his new home, Current TV, just from a distance, it’s hard not to see the host — his reputation for being difficult notwithstanding — as being on the right side, as it were, in this instance.

Simply put, Current was nowhere when it hired Olbermann and asked him, in essence, to put the channel on the map. And even if the ratings have lagged well behind what he used to deliver on MSNBC, he’s done that, making the otherwise cut-rate-looking network at least part of the conversation.

The tradeoff, clearly, was giving Olbermann control. After his difficulties at MSNBC, he was giving up the resources of NBC News in exchange for a place where he would be allowed to call the shots. That was pretty obvious from what he said at the time, and given where Current was, not an unreasonable position as long as it was delineated going into the deal.

He’s also right, watching “Countdown With Keith Olbermann,” that the channel hasn’t fulfilled its part of the bargain by building a news operation around him. There are frequently technical glitches and snafus that perhaps ought to have been expected but nevertheless must be frustrating and embarrassing, both to Olbermann and his guests.

Admittedly, Olbermann can be his own worst enemy, and I’d extend that to the way he’s handled this situation, including his Twitter war with the New York Times’ Brian Stelter: To accuse Stelter of “threatening” him to do an interview sounds overblown. If Stelter had information and Olbermann disputed it, he didn’t have the credibility to do that without going on the record. That said, when a source tells a reporter something is inaccurate, you had better have the facts pretty well nailed if you’re going to ignore their denials and proceed with publishing it.

Still, if Olbermann can’t address what’s happening for legal reasons, then he should clam up about it — including Twitter — until he or his representatives can. Since his contract prevents him from talking, there’s little to be gained in tap-dancing around the issue.

But that doesn’t mean he isn’t right, from what I’ve seen, in his reported beefs with Current.



More Voices

  • Taylor Swift's "ME!" Video Brings the

    Swift Take: Taylor's Dazzling 'ME!' Is a Phantasmagorical Sugar Rush (Watch)

    Taylor Swift has been leaving Easter eggs for her fans, with clues about the title, themes, et al. of her new single. The video, as it turns out, is almost like diving into a literal basket of Easter eggs. The opening title card for “ME!” reads “directed by Dave Meyers and Taylor Swift,” but we [...]

  • Contract Placeholder Business WGA ATA Agent

    WGA, Agents Face Tough Issues on New Franchise Pact (Column)

    The Writers Guild of America and the major talent agencies are seven weeks away from a deadline that could force film and TV writers to choose between their agents and their union. This is a battle that has been brewing for a year but few in the industry saw coming until a few weeks ago. [...]

  • FX Confronts Streaming Thanks to Disney

    Kicking and Screaming, FX Is Forced to Confront Future in the Stream (Column)

    During his network’s presentation at the winter Television Critics Assn. press tour, FX chief John Landgraf made waves — and headlines — by mounting perhaps his most direct criticism yet of Netflix. Landgraf, whose briefings to the press tend to rely heavily on data about the volume of shows with which FX’s competitors flood the [...]

  • Longtime TV Editor Recalls Working for

    How a Bad Director Can Spoil the Show (Guest Column)

    I have been blessed with editing some of TV’s greatest shows, working with some of the industry’s greatest minds. “The Wonder Years,” “Arrested Development,” “The Office,” “Scrubs,” “Pushing Daisies” and, most recently, “A Series of Unfortunate Events.” I have earned an Emmy, ACE Eddie Awards, and many nominations. But whatever kudos I’ve received, over my [...]

  • Stock market Stock buyback

    Stock Buybacks Leave Firms Without Funds to Invest in Future (Column)

    Corporate giants on the S&P 500 have spent more than $720 billion during the past year on stock buybacks. Media and entertainment firms account for only a fraction of that spending, but even $1 million spent on share repurchases seems a foolhardy expenditure at this transformational moment for the industry. The record level of spending [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content