You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Capitol Records sues ReDigi

EMI label alleges copyright infringement by 'used' digital music site

Alleging a new frontier in music piracy, EMI Music’s flagship label Capitol Records has filed a copyright infringement suit against digital music resale company ReDigi.

The suit, filed late Friday in New York federal court, claims that Cambridge, Mass.-based ReDigi — established in October as a marketplace for “used” digital music files — is nothing more than “a clearinghouse for copyright infringement and a business model built on widespread, unauthorized copying of sound recordings.”

In early November, the RIAA, which represents the four U.S. major label groups, fired a warning shot across ReDigi’s bow with a cease-and-desist letter disputing the company’s legal right to resell digital music. Capitol is the first major label to pursue legal action against the firm.

On its Web site, ReDigi touts itself as “the worlds (sic) first real LEGAL ALTERNATIVE: to expensive online music retailers and to illegal file sharing for music lovers who want to own their music. Is ReDigi Legal? YES it is!”

However, Capitol’s complaint depicts the company as the disseminator of multiple illegal copies of music files, and disputes ReDigi’s right to resell them under the so-called “first-sale doctrine” that protects the redistribution of physical albums and other legally purchased copyrighted material.

According to the action, users employ ReDigi’s proprietary software to designate songs they wish to sell from their computers. Tracks are then allegedly removed from the user’s computer and synced devices, stored on ReDigi’s server and offered for sale on the company’s web site.

The suit says, “The track ‘stored’ in and offered to consumers from ReDigi’s ‘cloud’ is necessarily a copy of the user’s original file, which ReDigi purportedly deletes from the user’s hard drive. No tangible, material object is transferred to the ReDigi ‘cloud.’?”

The suit adds that a second copy is then made when a ReDigi transaction is finalized:

“The so-called sale … can only be accomplished by the creation and transfer of yet another copy of what was once the original user’s digital file.”

Capitol’s action claims that even if music files were lawfully obtained, their resale is forbidden: “For example, Amazon.com … expressly prohibits users of its MP3 music service from any redistribution, transfer or sale of recordings downloaded via that service.”

ReDigi typically resells tracks for 79¢ (vs. the 99¢ usually charged at minimum by such online stores as iTunes and Amazon), and takes a fee of 5% to 15%, according to the suit.

Capitol flatly contests ReDigi’s assertion that its resale activity is protected under the first-sale doctrine.

“ReDigi … is not an ‘owner’ of any such lawfully made copy, nor is ReDigi disposing of the actual ‘particular copy purchased by a user,” the suit alleges. “Rather, ReDigi and its users are making and distributing unauthorized copies of that original file.”

Capitol’s action seeks preliminary and permanent injunctive relief; any profits attributable to ReDigi’s alleged infringements; maximum statutory damages of $150,000 per copyrighted work infringed; and compensatory and punitive damages to be determined at trial.

ReDigi has consistently maintained that its activities do not violate copyright statutes.

Its site states that its software “facilitates the ‘verification’ and ‘hand off’ of a digital music file from the seller to the buyer, ensuring both that the file is from a legitimate source and eligible for resale on ReDigi, and that any additional copies of a sold file that have been made by the seller … are also deleted.”

In a November interview with the New York Times, the company’s CEO John Ossenmacher said, “ReDigi is a marketplace that gives tools to be in compliance with copyright law.”

Ossenmacher said in a statement, “It’s a meritless case. We will defend it, and the digital rights of consumers vigorously.”

It remains to be seen if the other major labels or their imprints will lodge their own complaints against ReDigi. Spokesmen for Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment all declined to comment.

More Music

  • Sony Pictures logo

    Sony Pictures Profits Rise to $489 Million but Music Profits Tumble

    Profits at Sony Pictures rose to $489 million for the financial year running to the end of March 2019. That compares with $376 million in the previous financial year. The pictures division result was achieved despite a fall in revenue. That dropped from $9.13 billion in the preceding financial year to $8.87 billion in the [...]

  • Taylor Swift's "ME!" Video Brings the

    Swift Take: Taylor's Dazzling 'ME!' Is a Phantasmagorical Sugar Rush (Watch)

    Taylor Swift has been leaving Easter eggs for her fans, with clues about the title, themes, et al. of her new single. The video, as it turns out, is almost like diving into a literal basket of Easter eggs. The opening title card for “ME!” reads “directed by Dave Meyers and Taylor Swift,” but we [...]

  • Bruce Springsteen Drops New Song, 'Hello

    Bruce Springsteen Drops New Song, 'Hello Sunshine' (Listen)

    While listeners of SiriusXM’s E Street Radio got an advance listen — actually several advance listens — Bruce Springsteen didn’t officially drop his new single, “Hello Sunshine,” until midnight ET — and released an accompanying lyric video as well. While it’s great as far as lyric videos go, of course what really matters here is [...]

  • Pink Hurts 2B Human album

    Album Review: Pink's 'Hurts 2B Human'

    You’d never want to reduce a Pink album strictly to the math, but the strength of her records tends to have a pretty strong correlation to two factors: the number of Max Martin/Shellback productions and the amount of F-bombs dropped. Now, put those two together, and it’s pure gold, but either one is a pretty [...]

  • Beetlejuice review

    Broadway Review: 'Beetlejuice'

    “Such a bold departure from the original source material!” wisecracks the odd-looking fellow sitting on a coffin at the start of the Broadway musical “Beetlejuice.” The weird, nasty and outrageous title character is talking about a short lament just sung by a sad teen at her mother’s gravesite, as he breaks the fourth wall (“Holy [...]

  • Ron HowardBreakthrough Prize, Arrivals, NASA Ames

    Ron Howard Talks New Luciano Pavarotti Documentary

    If one is an anomaly, two are a coincidence and three are a trend, then Ron Howard might strictly become a music documentarian after “Pavarotti” hits theaters. The documentary about the world-famous Italian tenor Luciano Pavarotti comes on the heels of Howard’s “The Beatles: Eight Days a Week” and “Made in America,” a look at [...]

  • Ariana Grande Olivia Munn Michael Che

    Celebrities vs. Critics: Why This Battle Has No Winners (Column)

    When actor Olivia Munn tweeted a “short essay on…ugly behaviors” late Wednesday night, she insisted that a blog had been unfairly maligning her for years. She wrote that she wanted to confront the idea that baseless critiques, particularly those aimed at women, are never okay no matter how famous the target may be. On the [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content