×
You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Hollywood flexible with film trilogy math

Studios extend franchises beyond their 'conclusions'

Blame George Lucas or Peter Jackson and their blockbuster trilogies, but three has arbitrarily become the movie industry’s magic number when it comes to the narrative arc of franchises.

The reasons are logistical — once “Avatar” or “The Matrix” becomes a smash, there are savings, or at least efficiencies of scale, in doing two sequels at once — and practical, since actors and directors understandably don’t want to spend entire careers tethered to a single character or concept. In hindsight, the genius of the “Harry Potter” franchise was catching them young.

Whatever the cause, the result is a trio of Batman movies from Christopher Nolan, three Spider-Man films by Sam Raimi, two “Star Wars” trilogies, “The Lord of the Rings,” even three “The Bourne Identity” adventures. And now “The Hobbit,” initially designed as two movies, is expanding into three as well.

Had James Bond made his cinematic debut in the current environment, the super-spy would have killed Blofeld, told M to bugger off and decamped for the Bahamas at the close of “Goldfinger.”

Although the trilogy has become the de facto standard, building toward a third movie weighted with the promise of finality creates some inherent complications.

For starters, studios have no intention of letting wildly popular franchises simply ride into the sunset. So with the property almost sure to be revived in some form, providing elements of closure within a trilogy is often problematic.

Watching “The Dark Knight Rises,” there was a nagging sense, for all of director/co-writer Nolan’s meticulous plotting, that Warner Bros. will never allow Batman to rest very long — just as Bond has stayed in her Majesty’s service, in real-world terms, long enough to become “The Spy Who Hit Me With His Walker.”

Critic Roger Ebert cleverly addressed the matter of movies as products with a finite shelf life in a 2011 Newsweek essay on the subject of sequels. “Once a brand as been established in the marketplace, it makes sound business sense to repeat the formula,” he somewhat wearily conceded. “When Procter & Gamble discovered that Ivory soap would float, do you think they came out two years later with a soap named Buoyant?”

Granted, some filmmakers have gone to great lengths to create organic spinoffs that can justify further adventures, whether that involves prequels (as with “Star Wars” and now “The Hobbit”), breaking out individual characters or, in the case of something like “X-Men,” a bit of both.

On the flip side, Sony hit the reset button on “Spider-Man” in near-record time, retelling the character’s origin and finding new stars as an excuse to unspool this summer’s release a mere five years after the first trilogy wrapped up.

Universal, meanwhile, expanded the “Bourne” universe to introduce a wider conspiracy and new super-soldier, yielding what’s in essence a title, “The Bourne Legacy,” in search of an actual movie to go with it.

It’s perhaps an improvement over “Bewitched” syndrome — substituting in a new Darrin without explanation — but as constructed only fuels cynicism about studios churning out widgets in lieu of creative inspiration.

While it’s a given that popular titles will kept alive by any means necessary, the diminishing artistic returns seem to reinforce a point by Wall Street Journal critic Joe Morgenstern in his recent pan of the new “Total Recall.” “Remakes aren’t supposed to top originals, or even to match them,” he wrote. “They’re meant to draw new revenues from new audiences.”

Even so, one can argue with filmgoers becoming more sophisticated about the business and its avaricious nature. There’s enhanced incentive and self-interest in improving the sequel process — starting with a savvier approach to the elaborate fiction that the “final chapter” of a successful trilogy represents anything more than a forced respite before inevitably beginning anew.

Although three-and-out works as a baseball metaphor, basketball offers a more appropriate analogy, given the uneven application of the rule of three to studio franchises, creating headaches for those responsible for keeping money and merchandising flowing. Simply put, if the movie business is going to hit a higher percentage with its long-range game of extending franchises, studios are going to need some three-pointers.

More Film

  • WGA Agents Contract Tug of War

    Writers Guild Expands Suit Against Agencies With New Fraud Allegations

    The Writers Guild of America has bulked up its lawsuit with additional fraud allegations against Hollywood’s four biggest talent agencies. The WGA amended its suit Monday in Los Angeles Superior Court with the claim that CAA, WME, UTA and ICM partners have engaged “constructive fraud” by allegedly placing their own interests ahead of their clients [...]

  • 'Heroes Don't Die' Review: A Peculiar,

    Cannes Film Review: 'Heroes Don't Die'

    Just when you think modern cinema has exploited the found-footage conceit from every conceivable angle, along comes a tragicomic mockumentary tracing Bosnia’s recent war-ravaged history via the travails of a young French film crew getting to the root of a reincarnated identity crisis. Aude Léa Rapin’s first narrative feature “Heroes Don’t Die” is nothing if [...]

  • Mediapro, Complutense, NFTS Team On Screenwriting

    The Mediapro Group Launches Master’s Program at Madrid’s Complutense University

    Madrid-based production hub The Mediapro Studio has announced finalized details of an arrangement with Madrid’s Complutense University (UCM) and the National Film and Television School of London (NFTS) on a new Master’s program designed to develop new screenwriting talent. Mediapro general director Juan Ruiz de Gauna, UCM dean of information sciences Jorge Clemente and Irene [...]

  • Argentina, A New Member of Co-Production

    Argentina Joins European Co-Production Fund Eurimages

    CANNES – Argentina will join the European Council’s co-production fund Eurimages as an associate member starting  on October 1 2019, it was officially announced Monday at the Cannes Film Market. The agreement was unveiled by Ralph Haiek, president of Argentine agency Incaa, Eurimages executive director Roberto Olla and the president of global producers assn. Fiapf, [...]

  • "Black Coal Thin Ice" in Berlin

    Chinese Director Diao Yinan Drills Down on 'The Wild Goose Lake'

    Diao Yinan is the only Chinese director with a film in the main competition this year at Cannes. He’s already a known entity on the arthouse circuit having won the Golden Bear in Berlin in 2014 for his hardscrabble coal-blackened detective thriller “Black Coal, Thin Ice.” Now he makes the leap to the Croisette with [...]

  • Blaise Harrison On Cannes Directors’ Fortnight

    Switzerland’s Blaise Harrison on Directors’ Fortnight Player ‘Particles’

    Swiss filmmaker Blaise Harrison is bringing his fiction feature debut to this year’s Directors’ Fortnight at the Cannes Film Festival. Known for his documentary work, Harrison was selected for competition at the 2013 Locarno Festival for his film “Harmony,” about a marching band in the small French town of Pontarlier. “Particles” follows P.A., a teenager [...]

  • Constantin Film AG, Feilitzschstrase 6, Muenchen.

    Constantin’s Martin Moszkowicz on a New Market Realism (EXCLUSIVE)

    CANNES  —  2019’s Cannes  hit the floor running. Even after just two days of business, major sales companies were fielding offers from much of the world on top titles. After four days, quite a few were pretty confident they’d sell much of the world. Some of those deals are now being confirmed. Martin Moszkowicz, executive [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content