FCC chairman Julius Genachowski will address the National Assn. of Broadcasters convention later this afternoon, and a hot topic is expected to be a government proposal in which stations will be required to post data online detailing campaign buys of TV ad time. That information already is available to the public, but often it means visiting each station to collect the figures. Stations oppose the move, believing that the easily accessible information will put an undue regulatory burden on their operations and put them at a competitive disadvantage in setting ad rates.
In my latest story from print version of Variety, below, I look at how broadcasters are especially sensitive this year because they are becoming ever-more dependent on political spending to boost their bottom lines.
Leslie Moonves, president and CEO of CBS Corp., perhaps spoke for many a station owner in December when he summed up his take on a bonanza of 2012 political ad spending: “I’m not saying that’s the best thing for America, but it’s not a bad thing for the CBS Corp.”
A quarter of the way through the year, he is right: Stations are reaping the returns of not just a longer-than-expected Republican contest, but also the rise of the independent expenditures via SuperPACs. Election ad spending is boosting bottom lines in an industry that has yet to fully recover from a bruising recession. Signs still point to a record-setting year in broadcast political advertising, with estimates that spending on local television could hit $2.6 billion, according to the Campaign Media Analysis Group.
Stations are required to sell the lowest unit rate to candidates, so during peak periods such as the week before a primary or the month or so leading up to Nov. 6, demand may drive up prices for non-political advertisers. Stations also can charge top dollar for SuperPACs, which are not under the same restrictions as candidates. And with such independent expenditures outspending the campaigns in some of the primary states, they have proven to be even more lucrative.
What it means for station groups, particularly those with a good share of properties in swing states, is the ability to bolster balance sheets.
Bob Prather, prexy and COO of Gray Television, which has 36 stations in 30 markets, says the extra cash flow has allowed them to pay down debt. He points out that the election this year has the added advantage of being Nov. 6, almost a week into the month.
“That is huge spending those last six or seven days,” he says.
He says political ad revenue has accounted for 16% of Gray’s revenue in 2010, the highest it has ever been, and he adds it could go even higher this year. Gray’s political ad revenue reached about $57.6 million that year, a record.
This year, “It has been good, and we are ahead of where we wanted to be,” he says.
Gray has stations in such swing states as Ohio, Florida, Colorado, Michigan and North Carolina. Its three stations in Wisconsin stand to benefit not just from being a presidential battleground, but also the recall campaign against Gov. Scott Walker.
“The key is if you have got the No. 1 station (in a market), you are going to get two-thirds of the dollars,” Prather says.
Some stations have been expanding their morning newscasts — into ever earlier hours — that adds to inventory most prized by campaigns. Dennis Wharton, spokesman for the National Assn. of Broadcasters, says that as great as spending may be this cycle, it is “all over the map” on which stations will see substantial returns, even in markets where races are competitive. “You tend to see the same sort of station groups get the bulk of political revenue because of [campaigns’] laser-like focus on top newscasts,” he says.
Vincent Sadusky, president and CEO of LIN Media with 32 stations in 15 markets, says, “Some markets have outpaced and others have lagged.” But he doesn’t doubt that political ad revenue will be ever more important this year for stations.
“It has become a much more significant revenue source than it has been in the past,” he says. “In today’s digital world there are so many advertising alternatives, the reality is it is hard to get the message across in a medium where you have people’s attention.”