×

Adapting a classic? Get a lawyer

Copyrighted flourishes run through previously adapted works

Dorothy’s ruby slippers, Frankenstein’s neck bolts and Snow White’s blue and yellow dress may be indelible parts of their characters, but for studio lawyers, they are elements of a legal minefield.

Those features appeared in the classic film versions — MGM’s 1939 “The Wizard of Oz,” U’s 1931 “Frankenstein” and Disney’s 1937 “Snow White” — but not in the public domain literary works by L. Frank Baum, Mary Shelley and the brothers Grimm.

As studios increasingly pursue fairy tales, fantasies and other classics in the public domain, they have to contend with visual images, character traits and plot points that have become part of the public imagination — often elements that fall under copyright.

“You would be surprised by the features that the public associates with a character(that) are actually depictions (created by) the studio, and not the original source material,” says Larry Iser of Kinsella, Weitzman, Iser, Kump and Aldisert.

Ken Basin of Greenberg Glusker notes that a new project based on a public domain property that has already been adapted must be careful to draw from the original work and not the adaptation. “Dorothy’s slippers in the novel are silver,” Basin says. “But MGM’s movie producers wanted to show off Technicolor, so they made the slippers ruby to make the Technicolor pop.”

That means that future depictions of Dorothy not sanctioned by Warner Bros., which owns the property, had better find a silver handbag for those matching shoes.

If that sounds like a no-brainer to avoiding a copyright infringement claim, things get murkier when it comes to trademark. When Disney trademarked “Oz, the Great and Powerful,” its upcoming adaptation of a Baum work, it sought protection for the phrase for merchandising. Just a few weeks later, Warner Bros. trademarked the similar sounding “The Great and Powerful Oz.”

Basin calls trademark a much less obvious area of the law, but one that the Supreme Court has warned could not be used to create a “perpetual copyright.” A 2003 Supreme Court decision, Dastar vs. 20th Century Fox Film Corp., rejected the studio’s claims that a video firm which repackaged a World War II documentary series that had fallen into the public domain violated the Lanham Act — the principal federal statute that spells out what constitutes trademark infringement — even though the video company passed off the project as its own. Justice Antonin Scalia, in writing the 8-0 decision, warned of a “species of mutant copyright law that limits the public’s federal right to ‘copy and to use’ expired copyrights.”

Says Basin, “The fundamental question is, ‘Are consumers going to be confused about the origin of the goods or service?'”

Nevertheless, other decisions have bolstered Warner Bros.’ protections for some of its classic characters. The studio largely prevailed in a 2011 8th Circuit Court decision, which held that even though the publicity material a merchandiser used to create a line of “Wizard of Oz” products had fallen into the public domain, it still infringed on the studio’s copyrights in some instances because it evoked the film.

“Like the juxtaposition of an image and a phrase, a composite work combining two or more separate public-domain images (such as Judy Garland as Dorothy combined with an image of the Emerald City) also adds a new increment of expression of the film character that was not present in the separate images,” the court ruled. “Accordingly, products combining extracts from the public domain materials in a new arrangement infringe the copyright in the corresponding film.”

This doesn’t prevent Disney from going all out in merchandising its Oz, but it sure let’s them know that one studio’s legal team is on alert.

The makers of the current “Hotel Transylvania” were dealing with characters in the public domain, even though most folk’s image of Frankenstein and Dracula is based upon U’s movies in the 1930s (see separate story). And when contemporary audiences think of Snow White, they can recite the names of several of the seven dwarfs. But both recent versions of the tale, Relativity’s “Mirror Mirror” and U’s “Snow White and the Huntsman,” had to scrupulously avoid dwarfs that resemble the Disney crew.

Italians have their own images of “Pinocchio,” because Carlo Collodi’s tale is a national treasure and generations have grown up with old-time illustrations and the puppets that inspired by them. But the rest of the world is more familiar with Disney’s version, and any new visual images of the puppet and Jiminy Cricket need to avoid infringing on the Disney version. Disney’s stamp has claimed the hearts of dozens of other fairy tales, including “Alice in Wonderland,” “Wind in the Willows,” “Cinderella” and “Beauty and the Beast.”

Probably the most famous line in all the film versions of Tarzan is “Me Tarzan. You Jane.” But the King of the Jungle’s pidgin English and his chimp companion Cheeta were inventions of MGM, not Edgar Rice Burroughs. In the original novels, Tarzan was descended from British nobility and was multilingual.

So when marketers are beating their chests over a new ape-man, he’d better not remind anyone of Johnny Weissmuller.

More Biz

  • Honoree Yusef Salaam poses at the

    Yusef Salaam Signs With CAA (EXCLUSIVE)

    Yusef Salaam, one of the men who was exonerated after being wrongfully convicted in the 1989 Central Park jogger case, has signed with CAA for representation in all areas of business worldwide. The story of Salaam and the four other men — then boys — who were wrongfully convicted was recently told in Netflix’s miniseries [...]

  • Kim Kardashian West Kimono

    Kim Kardashian West's 'Kimono' Shapewear Sparks Backlash

    West announced yesterday that she was launching a line of form-fitting shapewear in nine different skin tones and a range of sizes. But the name of the reality star’s latest business venture — “Kimono” — is already wrapped up in controversy.Kimonos are Japanese robes traditionally worn at formal affairs, prompting some to accuse the businesswoman [...]

  • Discovery Corporate New Logo

    Discovery Faces Backlash From Unscripted Producers After Shift in Series Payment Process

    Discovery Inc. is facing a backlash from the unscripted production community following a shift in the cable giant’s protocol for paying for programming. During the past year, Discovery has implemented a new system that calls for the company to pay producers for shows after all episodes and related material for a given season have been [...]

  • Wendy Goldstein Named Republic Records President,

    Republic Records Names Wendy Goldstein President of West Coast Creative

    Republic Records advances Wendy Goldstein to President of West Coast Creative, label co-founders and chief executives Monte and Avery Lipman announced today. Goldstein has overseen the company’s Santa Monica office since 2017 as EVP of Republic Records. Over the past year, she headed up the label’s efforts for Ariana Grande’s  back-to-back No. 1 debuts for the singer’s “Sweetener” and “Thank U, Next” albums, and [...]

  • The Traitor

    MMC Studios, One of Germany's Biggest Production Facilities, Changes Hands

    Germany’s MMC Studios, which has hosted such recent international productions as Joseph Gordon-Levitt thriller “7500” and Marco Bellocchio’s Cannes competition film “The Traitor,” is changing hands. Frankfurt-based investment company Novum Capital has acquired the facility in Cologne, one of Germany’s biggest film and TV studios, from Luxembourg private equity fund Lenbach Equity Opportunities I. The [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content