×
You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

‘Sex and the City 2’ — and the Inevitable Backlash

“You are so the wrong person to review ‘Sex and the City 2,'” a female friend of mine said, before I had even seen the movie.

Here we go again.

To her mind, because I’m not a woman — or a “vagina-American,” as “The Daily Show’s” Samantha Bee once rather amusingly put it — I’m theoretically ill-equipped to understand the appeal of the “Sex and the City” franchise.

Never mind that I mostly enjoyed the HBO series and saw every episode. If you’re not a member of the target audience, based on this logic, don’t apply.

SATC2-15375rV2 Actually, this issue crops up all the time, often in connection with projects aimed at a particular race (see reviews of the Tyler Perry movies) or age groups (I’m not an 11-year-old girl, so how could I possibly “get” anything airing on The Disney Channel?).

My response is that all a critic can do is judge material based on whether he or she thinks that it works — while taking into account, I’d suggest, what its objectives are and who it’s for. In that respect, Variety is unlike most consumer publications in that we also emphasize whether something appears destined to succeed commercially, which forces us to contemplate whether it will connect with the audience for which it’s intended. (The movie certainly didn’t connect with most critics, based on the early consensus on Metacritic.com.)

Even from a qualitative standpoint, though, I can admire a good children’s show, silly teen comedy, female-oriented romantic comedy, etc., if it’s done well. That said, given how subjective any criticism is and how niche-oriented much of entertainment has become, it’s fair to say that as a 40-something white guy, my reaction won’t necessarily be the same as those within the demographic most likely to watch a given movie or TV show, and that’s at least worth acknowledging.

At any rate, here are the links to my reviews of the first “SATC” movie in 2008, and the sequel that opens this Thursday.

As any such opinions are subjective, feel free to disagree. Just please don’t blame it on my estrogen levels.

Update: As expected, the movie opened well boxoffice-wise — an estimated $27.2 million for its first two days — despite mostly terrible reviews on rottentomatoes.com (and I’ll throw in Metacritic.com, which I prefer). Of those who did like it, many strike a tone similar to “Access Hollywood’s” Scott Mantz, basically acknowledging everything that’s wrong with the movie, and then urging people not to listen to the critics who panned it.

“Haters will continue to hate it, but it’s not
for them anyway,” he writes — assuming that the negativity is entirely motivated by preconceived notions, not the movie itself.

And apologists, apparently, will continue to proudly not apologize for it.


More Voices

  • Contract Placeholder Business WGA ATA Agent

    WGA, Agents Face Tough Issues on New Franchise Pact (Column)

    The Writers Guild of America and the major talent agencies are seven weeks away from a deadline that could force film and TV writers to choose between their agents and their union. This is a battle that has been brewing for a year but few in the industry saw coming until a few weeks ago. [...]

  • FX Confronts Streaming Thanks to Disney

    Kicking and Screaming, FX Is Forced to Confront Future in the Stream (Column)

    During his network’s presentation at the winter Television Critics Assn. press tour, FX chief John Landgraf made waves — and headlines — by mounting perhaps his most direct criticism yet of Netflix. Landgraf, whose briefings to the press tend to rely heavily on data about the volume of shows with which FX’s competitors flood the [...]

  • Longtime TV Editor Recalls Working for

    How a Bad Director Can Spoil the Show (Guest Column)

    I have been blessed with editing some of TV’s greatest shows, working with some of the industry’s greatest minds. “The Wonder Years,” “Arrested Development,” “The Office,” “Scrubs,” “Pushing Daisies” and, most recently, “A Series of Unfortunate Events.” I have earned an Emmy, ACE Eddie Awards, and many nominations. But whatever kudos I’ve received, over my [...]

  • Stock market Stock buyback

    Stock Buybacks Leave Firms Without Funds to Invest in Future (Column)

    Corporate giants on the S&P 500 have spent more than $720 billion during the past year on stock buybacks. Media and entertainment firms account for only a fraction of that spending, but even $1 million spent on share repurchases seems a foolhardy expenditure at this transformational moment for the industry. The record level of spending [...]

  • Hollywood Has Come Far With Diversity

    An Insider's Look at Hollywood's Diversity Efforts and How Far It Still Needs to Go

    I am a white man working in Hollywood. I grew up in Beverlywood, an all-white, predominantly Jewish, Los Angeles neighborhood sandwiched between 20th Century Fox Studios and MGM, where my elementary school had only one black student. I am compelled to write about diversity in Hollywood because “diversity” — in front of and behind the camera [...]

  • Venice Film Festival A Star is

    How Venice, Toronto and Telluride Festivals Stole Cannes' Luster (Column)

    In all the years I’ve been attending film festivals, I have never seen a lineup that looked as good on paper as Venice’s did this fall, boasting new films by Alfonso Cuarón (“Roma”), Damien Chazelle (“First Man”), Paul Greengrass (“22 July”), Mike Leigh (“Peterloo”) and the Coen brothers (“The Ballad of Buster Scruggs”) in competition, [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content