The decision came on the same day that a federal district court judge in Massachusetts ruled that a portion of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which limited the definition of marriage to a man and a woman for purposes of federal laws, was unconstitutional. At stake are more than 1,000 federal marriage-based benefits that are given to heterosexual couples but not same-sex couples.

“In the wake of DOMA, it is only sexual orientation that differentiates a married couple entitled to federal marriage-based benefits from one not so entitled,” U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro wrote. “And this court can conceive of no way in which such a difference might be relevant to the provision of the benefits at issue.” 

More Voices

  • Hollywood Safe Workplace

    Why Hollywood Needs to Lead the Way in Showing How to Create a Safer Workplace

    The decision came on the same day that a federal district court judge in Massachusetts ruled that a portion of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which limited the definition of marriage to a man and a woman for purposes of federal laws, was unconstitutional. At stake are more than 1,000 federal marriage-based benefits that […]

  • Seven Seconds

    Fighting the Racial Bias at the Core of Hollywood’s Cop Shows (Guest Column)

    The decision came on the same day that a federal district court judge in Massachusetts ruled that a portion of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which limited the definition of marriage to a man and a woman for purposes of federal laws, was unconstitutional. At stake are more than 1,000 federal marriage-based benefits that […]

  • Harvey Weinstein Trial

    Column: Documentarian Barry Avrich Ponders Whether Harvey Weinstein Will Be Convicted

    The decision came on the same day that a federal district court judge in Massachusetts ruled that a portion of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which limited the definition of marriage to a man and a woman for purposes of federal laws, was unconstitutional. At stake are more than 1,000 federal marriage-based benefits that […]

  • Janet Mock Pose

    'Pose' Writer Janet Mock on Making History With Trans Storytelling (Guest Column)

    The decision came on the same day that a federal district court judge in Massachusetts ruled that a portion of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which limited the definition of marriage to a man and a woman for purposes of federal laws, was unconstitutional. At stake are more than 1,000 federal marriage-based benefits that […]

  • Tony Awards Sightlines Column

    How to Produce the Tony Awards: 5 Unsolicited Tips

    The decision came on the same day that a federal district court judge in Massachusetts ruled that a portion of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which limited the definition of marriage to a man and a woman for purposes of federal laws, was unconstitutional. At stake are more than 1,000 federal marriage-based benefits that […]

  • Under the Silver Lake

    Cannes 2018's Hidden Thrill: The Opportunity to Find New Voices

    The decision came on the same day that a federal district court judge in Massachusetts ruled that a portion of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which limited the definition of marriage to a man and a woman for purposes of federal laws, was unconstitutional. At stake are more than 1,000 federal marriage-based benefits that […]

  • Kathryn Bigelow Kathryn Bigelow poses backstage

    It's Time for Action, Not Promises, to Get More Women in Filmmaking (Guest Column)

    The decision came on the same day that a federal district court judge in Massachusetts ruled that a portion of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which limited the definition of marriage to a man and a woman for purposes of federal laws, was unconstitutional. At stake are more than 1,000 federal marriage-based benefits that […]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content