×

The Clinton Library Donors

That, and other news, in today’s Roundup and Recap.

What is amazing about the release of names of donors to the Clinton Library Foundation is how few surprises there actually are.

There had long been suspicions that it would be made up of interests from Arab states and other foreign governments, as well as a smattering of entertainment and media moguls who are longtime backers of both Clintons. That is exactly what came out when former President Clinton’s foundation released a complete list for the first time, as part of an agreement with President-elect Obama to pave the way for Hillary Clinton moving into the role of Secretary of State.

Some of the names, like Steve Bing and Haim Saban, already had been revealed as donors, as well as a contribution from David Geffen’s foundation, interesting because he has had a very well publicized falling out with the Clintons after being one of their most prolific donors. No dates were given for any of the contributions, and the list of names only includes a range of contributions — a kind of transparency lite.

Bing topped the list of media figures, chipping in between $10 million and $25 million. Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining financier who formed Lions Gate Entertainment in 1997, also contributed that amount. His contribution already was the subject of a New York Times investigative piece during Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

In the $5 million to $10 million range were Haim Saban and the Wasserman Foundation. Donors in the $1 million to $5 million range included Eli Broad, the Elton John Foundation, BET founder Robert L. Johnson, Michael and Jena King and the Streisand Foundation.

In the $500,000 to $1 million category were James Murdoch, Paul Newman and the Newman’s Own Foundation, News Corp., Steven Spielberg, the Geffen Foundation and the Annenberg Foundation.

Google made a contribution in the $250,000 to $500,000 range, and Edgar M. Bronfman, MTV Networks, the Berry Gordy Family Foundation and Jonathan Tisch each chipped in $100,000 to $250,000.

More on Warren: Barack Obama defended the choice of Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at his swearing in ceremony, as reports surfaced that the decision to choose the Saddleback Church pastor was his and his alone.

Obama said at a press conference, “There are going to be a wide range of viewpoints that will be presented, and that’s how it should be. . .That dialogue I think is part of what my campaign’s been all about.”

Karen Ocamb got ahold of a list of the Obama camp’s talking points on the choice of Warren, an indication that they at least recognize the controversial nature of the choice.

Reaction from some of the most prominent gay bloggers and supporters of Obama has moved from anger to dissecting the politics involved.

John Aravosis of AmericaBlog writes, “This is rather uncharacteristic of Obama, making some grand gesture from his gut, and not checking it with his brain, or the brains around him. Unless, of course, his brain trust thought this was a brilliant strategic move. I can easily imagine them thinking, what better than to make a nod to the religious right and the religious left, by having Rick Warren and Joseph Lowery, at his inauguration?”

Marc Ambinder, neutral observer of the flap, writes, “In his short political career, Obama has deftly manipulated political symbols to his advantage, but he’s never been one to pay homage to one of the most sacred regulations of identity politics, which is that one must take care of one’s own kind before turning outward. His mind operates differently. Obama does believe, as many of his supporters do, that there are uncrossable demarcation lines between the reasonable and the profane. But he doesn’t believe that Warren, someone he admires for reaching outside his (Warren’s) comfort zone on AIDS, is all that different from himself. Obama is simultaneously capable of admiring Warren while disdaining Warren’s oogedy boogedy appraoch to gay relationships and his uninformed response to torture. Warren’s views might be hurtful to gays; Obama does not think they are harmful.

“That said, his team bungled this a bit. Reaching out to gay groups to give them a heads up might have softened the edge of their reaction and given them internal confidence that they were valued members of Obama’s coalition. Dropping the list (like it’s hot), without pre-notice, must have seemed like a sharp slap in the face. The LGBT community is still very raw about Proposition 8, and one would assume that at least someone in Obama’s inner circle would be aware of this.”

Popular on Variety

More Voices

  • "The Stockholm Syndrome" - Pictured: Rajesh

    Emmys: Is It Time to Give Multicams Their Own Category? (Column)

    The question of whether multi-camera sitcoms are a dying breed isn’t a new one. The few remaining purveyors of the format, including “The Big Bang Theory” executive producer Chuck Lorre, have been asked that question for years. But even as Lorre ventures into the single-camera world with such shows as the Golden Globe-winning “The Kominsky [...]

  • Veep HBO

    Celebrating Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Emmy's Comedy Queen (Column)

    Let’s take a moment to give Julia Louis-Dreyfus some much-deserved praise. As HBO’s “Veep” ends its run — and aims to add a coda to its already amazing haul over the years at the Emmys — the actress is poised to make history one more time this September. All signs point to another win in [...]

  • Emma Watson MTV Movie Awards

    It's Time for the Emmys to Eliminate Gender-Specific Acting Categories (Column)

    As TV and storytelling continue to evolve, does it still make sense to silo male and female performers into separate Emmy categories? Splitting up “outstanding actor” and “outstanding actress” awards as if they’re different skill sets seems like an outdated practice — yet combining them, and eliminating half of the key acting Emmys in the [...]

  • The Good Place NBC

    Broadcasters Committed to Emmy Telecast Despite Cable, Streaming Dominance (Column)

    Here’s what you won’t see much of at the Primetime Emmy Awards on Fox: Fox.  It’s Fox’s turn to telecast the ceremony, yet it’s a somewhat bittersweet affair for the network, which only landed 18 nominations this year. That means few Fox stars will even be in attendance at the Microsoft Theater, let alone onstage, [...]

  • Eugene Levy Schitts Creek

    Emmy Nods to Veteran Actors Prove Importance of Longevity (Column)

    Despite some well-documented snubs, Television Academy members did a great job with this year’s Emmy nominations when it came to recognizing new series, such as FX’s “Pose” and Netflix’s “Russian Doll,” as well as rising talent including Anthony Carrigan (HBO’s “Barry”), Joey King (Hulu’s “The Act”) and Billy Porter (“Pose”). That spotlight on fresh series [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content