×
You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Filmmakers resist putting pix to the test

Few of the 2006 summer tentpoles were test-screened

Before setting sail, “Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest” was never test-screened. Likewise, Ron Howard decided not to put “The Da Vinci Code” through research screenings before an anonymous audience.

In fact, outside of “Cars,” none of the 2006 summer tentpoles was test-screened, usually considered de rigueur for mega-budget pics.

Fearing negative Internet buzz, additional studio interference and a loss of control, directors like Howard or “Superman Returns'” Bryan Singer are winning their demands to skip testing, even as studios complain that the result are movies that are overlong and overwrought.

The irony this year is that the more a studio seems to have riding on a pic, the less likely it is to have been screened.

For pics that rely heavily on CGI, there often isn’t enough time to go through the rigorous test screening process — or so the argument goes. Jerry Bruckheimer mainstains he would have liked to test “Dead Man’s Chest,” but the special effects were finished so close to its press screenings and premiere that there just wasn’t time to line up a research audience.

“I think test screenings are absolutely invaluable,” gripes one studio exec. “I think not doing them is a mistake. Who paid for the movie, after all?”

Since the days of silent film, studios have screened their movies before anonymous audiences as a way to gauge reaction to such things as length and ending, as well as to provide marketing execs with a detailed roadmap of how to tailor their advertising campaigns.

The screenings have always run the risk of premature reviews. On Jan. 1, 1915, a test screening of “Birth of a Nation” was held in Riverside, Calif. While the film had a provocative racial subtext, there were no blacks in the audience. A local reporter for the Riverside Daily Press snuck into the screening and reported that D.W. Griffith had “treated his subject fairly” — an opinion that has been challenged by many observers over the decades.

In one of the more famous examples, Joe Farrell, the former Nielsen NRG exec who for years was the grand guru of research tests, analyzed the results of the screening of “Fatal Attraction” and advised Paramount to reshoot the ending so Glenn Close’s character is killed, rather than commiting suicide.

Some of this year’s pics changed significantly through the testing process. Pixar pushed back the release of “Cars” by a year after seeing the results of test screenings. After testing “The Break-Up,” Universal decided to return to Chicago and reshoot a happier ending. That’s why Vince Vaughn looks noticeably thinner in the latter part of the movie.

Many helmers, however, have come to despise the process, not only because of interference from studio execs but because of fears that a movie’s content will leak on the Internet.

Last month, the plane flying Paramount execs back to Los Angeles had barely gotten off the runway in Minneapolis, where they had test-screened Oliver Stone’s “World Trade Center,” before a review was posted on the Web. The same thing happened when Martin Scorsese’s upcoming “The Departed” was summarized on Ain’t It Cool News, which also has reviewed the serial killer drama “Zodiac.”

“When the site started 10 years ago, we definitely saw it as a way of invading the test-screening process,” says Drew “Moriarty” McSweeny, the West Coast editor of AICN. “I make no bones about that. We wanted to return the power to the filmmaker. I think it has worked to a huge degree.”

Singer and Howard screened rough cuts of “Superman Returns” and “Da Vinci,” respectively, during what’s come to be known in Hollywood vernacular as a “friends & family” test screening.

Singer is said to have cut a little over 15 minutes from “Superman” after showing the pics to a small cadre of trusted confidantes.

But even with those cuts, both pics weathered criticism that they were overlong, as did the “Pirates” sequel.

For their part, though, most studio execs would rather test, even if word leaks on the Internet.

“The cart shouldn’t be leading the horse,” says another marketing exec. “You can’t freak out over the Internet and let it overshadow getting the movie where it needs to be. As an executive, you get too close to the project. And face it, a friend or family member can’t be entirely objective.”

The question now is whether filmmakers will have even more power in dictating whether they will allow future projects to be test-screened.

Why? Even though though “Pirates” and “Code” didn’t go through testing — and the reviews may be proof of it — their box office performance doesn’t seem to have suffered.

More Film

  • Come as You Are review

    SXSW Film Review: 'Come as You Are'

    The rare remake that’s actually a slight improvement on its predecessor, Richard Wong’s “Come as You Are” translates Geoffrey Enthoven’s 2011 Belgian “Hasta la Vista” to middle America. Other changes are less substantial, but this seriocomedy has a less formulaic feel than the original while remaining a crowd-pleasing buddy pic-caper with a soft-pedaled minority empowerment [...]

  • Strange Negotiations review

    SXSW Film Review: 'Strange Negotiations'

    In a era when some mainstream entertainers have transitioned to targeting faith-based audiences, David Bazan is moving in the other direction. The gifted songwriter’s ersatz band Pedro the Lion was perhaps the most successful Christian indie rock act of its time, and the first to significantly cross over to secular fans. Then he ditched that persona (and [...]

  • Bluebird review

    SXSW Film Review: ‘Bluebird’

    As affectionate as a love letter but as substantial as an infomercial, Brian Loschiavo’s “Bluebird” may be of most interest to casual and/or newly converted country music fans who have occasionally wondered about the songwriters behind the songs. There’s a better than even-money chance that anyone who’s a loyal and longtime aficionado of the musical [...]

  • ‘Wonder Park’ Tops Studios’ TV Ad

    ‘Wonder Park’ Tops Studios’ TV Ad Spending for the Fourth Week in a Row

    In this week’s edition of the Variety Movie Commercial Tracker, powered by the TV advertising attention analytics company iSpot.tv, Paramount Pictures claims the top spot in spending for the fourth week in row with “Wonder Park.” Ads placed for the animated film had an estimated media value of $5.18 million through Sunday for 1,718 national [...]

  • Michael B. Jordan Jordan Vogt-Roberts

    Film News Roundup: Michael B. Jordan, Jordan Vogt-Roberts Team for Monster Movie

    In today’s film news roundup, Michael B. Jordan is producing a creature feature, billiards champ Cisero Murphy is getting a movie, the sixth Terminator movie gets a title, and Graham King receives an honor. PROJECT UNVEILED New Regency and Michael B. Jordan’s Outlier Society are partnering on an untitled monster movie from “Kong: Skull Island” [...]

  • Nicolas Cage

    Nicolas Cage to Star in Martial Arts Actioner 'Jiu Jitsu'

    Nicolas Cage will star in the martial arts actioner “Jiu Jitsu,” based on the comic book of the same name. The cast will also include Alain Moussi, who stars in the “Kickboxer” franchise. Dimitri Logothetis is producing with Martin Barab and directing from a script he wrote with Jim McGrath. Highland Film Group is handling [...]

  • Chinese success of Thai film "Bad

    Chinese, Thai Shingles Pact for Co-Production Fund at FilMart

    A deal to establish a 100 million yuan ($14.9 million) co-production fund between China and Thailand was struck at FilMart on Tuesday to help launch TV and film projects that will appeal to Chinese and Southeast Asian audience. The deal that was struck by China’s Poly Film Investment Co., TW Capital from Thailand and Thai [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content