You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Corporate crunch forces studio rethink

What do they want to be when they grow up?

That’s essentially the question the Hollywood studios find themselves addressing these days. The question sounds facetious, if not surreal, but, in point of fact, some serious soul searching is going on, fueled in part by recent (and secret) industry studies demonstrating a slow but significant decline in core audience.

In the beginning, the business model for Hollywood studios was clear-cut: They financed the development and production of a slate of movies, drawing on a roster of stars and filmmakers, and presided over their distribution to wholly owned theaters.

But that model continues to evolve. The theater circuits were spun off long ago and the star contracts terminated. These days, production costs increasingly are being out-sourced to hedge funds and other financing groups. And overseas entities often cover marketing and distribution costs in distant territories. Essentially, every aspect of studio overhead is now under serious scrutiny by corporate numbers crunchers.

And along comes MGM, which hopes to thrive on another business model entirely: MGM doesn’t plan to pay for development costs on its films or even to cover the production tab (except for the James Bond and “Pink Panther” franchise films). In some cases, it will pick up some or all of the cost of prints and advertising, but it’s looking to outside entities to carry the risk on its substantial release slate.

Will Leo the Lion be able to become a major player again under this sort of game plan?

Rival studio chiefs are dubious, but they are also envious. Their corporate parents keep dispatching mandates that costs must be cut and staff trimmed, but they are trapped within long-established management structures.

Development once was an essential activity for the studios when major stars were under contract and casting could be preordained. Today, studios are writing off $150 million or more in a single year for projects that were pre-destined for failure. And when regimes change, as happened at Paramount, the writeoffs balloon even further.

All of which raises the ugly question: How much of this activity could be outsourced? Could the entities that are funding their own slates also fund their development?

Even further: Does each studio have to maintain its own staff to preside over post-production? Some believe stand-alone companies could provide most of this support work, reducing costs and relieving the studios of overhead.

The key objection to this sort of thinking, to be sure, is that studios should not surrender their basic creative mission. The assembly line will stand idle, for example, if studio development teams don’t marshal new projects and if dedicated post-production cadres aren’t standing by to supply the finishing touches.

All that is true, except for one reality: As the studios have become progressively bigger, overheads have continued to expand and, more disturbing, studio functionaries have become ever more bureaucratic. There’s almost always an inverse ratio between the size of an organization and its level of creative output.

Sir Howard Stringer, who presides over the massive multinational called Sony, observed recently that “corporate islands,” as he termed them, demonstrated by far the greatest entrepreneurial energy within large organizational structures. Thus, when conglomerates set up fairly autonomous units assigned to specific projects — PlayStations, for example — they turn out to be more flexible and innovative than conventional sectors.

Would the same prove true at the studios? Indeed, the newly reconstituted DreamWorks represents that sort of “island” within Paramount, operating with autonomy on its own slate of films, devoid of much of its former overhead and ancillary distractions. One or two of the hedge funds now pouring money into the studios also are examining structures of this sort.

Behind all this is a very simple proposition: The model of the traditional studio no longer seems either nimble or profitable.

Is there a better idea out there? Is MGM circling it?

More Film

  • Osopez Pitches Toon Adult comedy 'Pleasefixers'

    Animation!: Costa Rica's Osopez Pitches 'The Pleasefixers'

    Costa Rican animation studio Osopez is developing 3D CGI black comedy series “The Pleasefixers,” its most ambitious project to date, which has been selected for pitching at Ventana Sur’s 3rd Animation! showcase. Co-created by Osopez’s Ariel Arburola and Carlos Redondo, the 12-episode, 23-minute TV show targets young adults and adults, aged 18-34. “Pleasefixers” follows a [...]

  • ‘The Goalkeeper’s’ Gory Patiño Teams With

    ‘The Goalkeeper’s’ Gory Patiño Teams with Luis Reneo on ‘Pseudo’

    Bolivia’s Gory Patiño, writer-director for his country’s Academy Award submission “The Goalkeeper” – also the highest grossing Bolivian film in 15 years – and his frequent filmmaking partner, Spain’s Luis Reneo, are participating in this year’s Ventana Sur films in progress section with their socio-political thriller “Pseudo.” The project was also selected as a finalist [...]

  • Roy Ashton

    Ventana Sur: The Gersh Agency’s Roy Ashton Talks Pitching 101

    BUENOS AIRES — Roy Ashton, responsible for packaging and selling projects to markets and operators such as Amazon for Hollywood’s The Gersh Agency, spoke to a standing-room-only crowd about the process of pitching successfully to the U.S. market ahead of a script workshop he attended Tuesday afternoon. Ashton emphasized the draw of storytelling on an international [...]

  • Ainbo

    Ventana Sur: CMG Pre-Sells ‘Ainbo’ to Over Half the World (EXCLUSIVE)

    BUENOS AIRES — Marking what looks very much like a new record for animation in Latin America, Edward Noeltner’s Cinema Management Group, the sales company behind Oscar-nominated “Loving Vincent,” has pre-sold “Ainbo – Spirit of the Amazon” to over half the planet. “Ainbo” was picked up by CMG in January 2017 off the first edition [...]

  • Breaking Glass Picks Up Romantic Drama

    Ventana Sur: Breaking Glass Picks up Threesome Drama ‘We Are Three’ (EXCLUSIVE)

    Breaking Glass Pictures has clinched North American rights to Argentine helmer-scribe Marcelo Briem Stamm’s ménage-a-trois drama “We Are Three,” (“Somos Tr3s”), which it first spotted at the Buenos Aires’ 2017 Ventana Sur. Breaking Glass CEO Rich Wolff and Ida Martins of Media Luna New Films closed the deal at this year’s Ventana Sur. The film’s [...]

  • Chile’s Powerful Producers Assn. Aims For

    Ventana Sur: Chile’s Producers Look to Take Industry to Next Level

    BUENOS AIRES — Oscar-winning Chilean producer Juan de Dios Larraín (“A Fantastic Woman”), Sebastián Freund, co-creator of Chile’s biggest ever B.O. hit, “Stefan vs. Kramer,” and Gabriela Sandoval, co-director of Sanfic, Chile’s biggest film event, Sanfic festival, are joining forces to haul Chile’s much vaunted cinema into the 21st century. They will be joined by [...]

  • Portugal’s Pepe Rapazote to lead Leonardo

    Ventana Sur: Portugal’s Pepe Rapazote Toplines Argentine Leonardo Brzezicki’s ‘Almost in Love’ (EXCLUSIVE)

    Portuguese actor Pêpê Rapazote (“Narcos,” “Shameless”) is toplining Argentine helmer-scribe Leonardo Brzezicki’s second feature, “Almost in Love.” The father-daughter drama is the third collaboration between Argentine shingle Ruda Cine and Rodrigo Teixeira’s RT Features of Brazil, a co-producer of such stellar titles as “Call Me by Your Name,” “Little Men,” “Patti Cake$” and “Frances Ha.” Derk-Jan [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content