You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Nix fatally flawed merger plan

Guest column

This column was corrected June 11, 2003.

Management trustees say that merging the SAG and AFTRA pension and health plans is not in the best interest of actors. It’s a certainty that the pension and health plans will not be merged unless management changes its view. SAG and AFTRA leaders say they are determined to persuade management to change its mind.

Let’s suppose they succeed: Will our future earnings go into the SAG pension, the AFTRA pension, or into a third pension created in the merged union (AIMA)? Will our AIMA pension be higher or lower than our SAG and AFTRA pensions? Will we qualify for the new AIMA health plan? Will our premiums go up? Will our benefits go down?

SAG and AFTRA don’t have any answers, but we’re being asked to vote anyway.

For months they’ve been selling their consolidation plan to us as “the first step toward merging our pension and health.”

Now that it’s come to light that merging P&H is highly unlikely, they’re backtracking and saying that there are more important reasons to merge, like “cutting costs,” for example.

Here too, there are many unanswered questions. We know for certain that AIMA will cost millions of dollars to create and maintain and it will operate for some time “in the red.” A “business plan” is mentioned in the Screen Actors Magazine that supposedly shows how costs will be cut to compensate for this.

I haven’t been shown this plan (and I’m the national recording secretary of SAG). Furthermore, they haven’t even shown it to Kent McCord, our national treasurer.

Too often the architects of this proposal are saying, “Trust me.” I’ve been in this business a long time — when someone says “trust me,” make sure it’s “in writing.”

SAG and AFTRA have been working together for 50 years with rare jurisdictional conflicts, every one one of which was resolved through negotiations.

Now, for the first time in history, our leaders say they can’t do what we’ve elected and paid them to do. We’re told that we must dissolve both unions and form an entirely separate entity called AIMA, which owns all our contracts, our bank accounts and every dollar of our dues.

It will wield unprecedented powers, including the right to veto anything negotiated or ratified by actors. It can grow larger and larger over the coming years (its constitution gives it the power to absorb and unlimited number of unions) and SAG, as an “affiliate,” will disappear into enormous, complicated bureaucracy.

When we help defeat this flawed merger plan, our unions will be forced to address the sound, well-documented alternative that were supposed and discredited in order to present this plan as ‘the only choice.’

I’m not resistant to change — but this is clearly the wrong deal. Sadly, I vote no.

(Editor’s note: Trustees in charge of health and pension benefits have, in fact, given mixed signals regarding the effects of the merger. For more background on the propsed merger, visit www.variety.com/AIMA.)

More Voices

  • Stock market Stock buyback

    Stock Buybacks Leave Firms Without Funds to Invest in Future (Column)

    Corporate giants on the S&P 500 have spent more than $720 billion during the past year on stock buybacks. Media and entertainment firms account for only a fraction of that spending, but even $1 million spent on share repurchases seems a foolhardy expenditure at this transformational moment for the industry. The record level of spending [...]

  • Hollywood Has Come Far With Diversity

    An Insider's Look at Hollywood's Diversity Efforts and How Far It Still Needs to Go

    I am a white man working in Hollywood. I grew up in Beverlywood, an all-white, predominantly Jewish, Los Angeles neighborhood sandwiched between 20th Century Fox Studios and MGM, where my elementary school had only one black student. I am compelled to write about diversity in Hollywood because “diversity” — in front of and behind the camera [...]

  • Venice Film Festival A Star is

    How Venice, Toronto and Telluride Festivals Stole Cannes' Luster (Column)

    In all the years I’ve been attending film festivals, I have never seen a lineup that looked as good on paper as Venice’s did this fall, boasting new films by Alfonso Cuarón (“Roma”), Damien Chazelle (“First Man”), Paul Greengrass (“22 July”), Mike Leigh (“Peterloo”) and the Coen brothers (“The Ballad of Buster Scruggs”) in competition, [...]

  • Black Women in Medicine BTS

    Hollywood Needs to Include People With Disabilities on Both Sides of the Camera (Guest Column)

    In five years, nothing has changed. Despite open calls for greater diversity and inclusion, recent research shows that there was little change in the number of characters with disabilities in popular films in 2017. A study conducted by the Annenberg Inclusion Initiative of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism found that [...]

  • Seven Seconds

    Fighting the Racial Bias at the Core of Hollywood’s Cop Shows (Guest Column)

    If fiction is the lie that tells a deeper truth, the TV crime genre has been, for the most part, the lie that simply tells a lie. As a storyteller (Veena) and an advocate for racial justice (Rashad), we collaborated for the past two-and-a-half years in an attempt to reimagine the roles of cops, victims, [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content