You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

The conventions: No life in these parties

FOR THOSE OF YOU still hooked on “Survivor,” here’s a quick update on what you missed:

Considered as showbiz, the conventions played like two infomercials in search of Tony Robbins. As political events, the conventions may prompt millions to stay away from polling places.

A generation ago, the Republican convention would have highlighted a down-to-the-wire McCain vs. Bush floor fight. Bradley’s challenge to Gore might also have provided a spark for the Democrats. And, since the Democratic delegates seemed to “hang” more with folk heroes Streisand and Geffen than at the Staples Center, who knows whether one of these two might have been inspired to run as a dark horse!

The bottom line, though, is that the two parties have put their conventions out of business, and the broadcast networks’ decision to snub them is understandable.

The ratings were even lower than for the 1996 conventions. ABC’s live coverage Aug. 15 pathetically drew half the audience watching NBC’s “Dateline.” The stage-managing was so inept that it was almost 11 p.m. in the East before President Clinton started his oration.

While the efforts of CNN, MSNBC and Fox News to pick up the slack were admirable, their coverage, too, seemed journalistically onanistic.

Fleeting glimpses of the convention floor were intercut with interminable panels of journalists arguing with other journalists. By Day Three, the “experts” themselves seemed catatonic when asked, yet again, whether Al Gore really was a stiff.

THE TERRIBLE TRUTH was that there was essentially nothing to talk about, and the party poobahs weren’t helping, either. The left wing of the Democratic party, for example, simply wasn’t interested in picking apart Joe Lieberman. Step up military spending? That sounds like a neat Democratic idea.

The conventions of old could count on both suspense and nostalgia, yet even here these conventions bombed.

Everyone knew the outcome, so there was no shot at suspense and no insights into the dealmaking and tradeoffs — the grist for high drama when figures like Kennedy and Nixon were making their runs.

As for nostalgia, President Reagan, of course, could not be summoned up by the Republicans, and Teddy Kennedy looked more like a float than a senator.

It remained for Clinton to supply the “Elvis moment,” but he, too, seemed oddly irrelevant — the Democrats at once needed him, yet wanted him to go away.

What’s sad about all this is that the conventions of old probably would have played great for today’s audience. Viewers clearly are desperate for anything that seems spontaneous and real, however “staged” these shows may be. How else could one account for the success of “Survivor” or “Big Brother,” or for the resurgence of the quiz show?

At the same time, there seems to be a growing skepticism over the media prism through which we all view the political process. Al Gore’s personality has to be filtered through those journalists who cover him, and who clearly find George W. Bush more convivial. Yet Tommy Lee Jones tells us that his one-time Harvard roommate, Al Gore, was the life of the party.

THE ONLY GLIMPSES the public sees of its candidates are so stage-managed, so manufactured, that there’s no way of assessing character or personality. During the conventions, each candidate is depicted in maudlin detail as the ideal Daddy — one finds oneself longing for a lone “bad apple.”

Doesn’t anyone remember that Reagan was a notoriously clueless Daddy and it didn’t hurt his political career at all? This is an election, not a rerun of “Father Knows Best.”

If our politicos want to avoid fading even further into obscurity, they’d do well to consider the following retro measures: Bring back the smoke-filled room. Bring back the old-style conventions with all their intrigue and dealmaking. Most important of all, bring back some candidates we wouldn’t want to vote off our island.

More Voices

  • FX Confronts Streaming Thanks to Disney

    Kicking and Screaming, FX Is Forced to Confront Future in the Stream (Column)

    During his network’s presentation at the winter Television Critics Assn. press tour, FX chief John Landgraf made waves — and headlines — by mounting perhaps his most direct criticism yet of Netflix. Landgraf, whose briefings to the press tend to rely heavily on data about the volume of shows with which FX’s competitors flood the [...]

  • Longtime TV Editor Recalls Working for

    How a Bad Director Can Spoil the Show (Guest Column)

    I have been blessed with editing some of TV’s greatest shows, working with some of the industry’s greatest minds. “The Wonder Years,” “Arrested Development,” “The Office,” “Scrubs,” “Pushing Daisies” and, most recently, “A Series of Unfortunate Events.” I have earned an Emmy, ACE Eddie Awards, and many nominations. But whatever kudos I’ve received, over my [...]

  • Stock market Stock buyback

    Stock Buybacks Leave Firms Without Funds to Invest in Future (Column)

    Corporate giants on the S&P 500 have spent more than $720 billion during the past year on stock buybacks. Media and entertainment firms account for only a fraction of that spending, but even $1 million spent on share repurchases seems a foolhardy expenditure at this transformational moment for the industry. The record level of spending [...]

  • Hollywood Has Come Far With Diversity

    An Insider's Look at Hollywood's Diversity Efforts and How Far It Still Needs to Go

    I am a white man working in Hollywood. I grew up in Beverlywood, an all-white, predominantly Jewish, Los Angeles neighborhood sandwiched between 20th Century Fox Studios and MGM, where my elementary school had only one black student. I am compelled to write about diversity in Hollywood because “diversity” — in front of and behind the camera [...]

  • Venice Film Festival A Star is

    How Venice, Toronto and Telluride Festivals Stole Cannes' Luster (Column)

    In all the years I’ve been attending film festivals, I have never seen a lineup that looked as good on paper as Venice’s did this fall, boasting new films by Alfonso Cuarón (“Roma”), Damien Chazelle (“First Man”), Paul Greengrass (“22 July”), Mike Leigh (“Peterloo”) and the Coen brothers (“The Ballad of Buster Scruggs”) in competition, [...]

  • Black Women in Medicine BTS

    Hollywood Needs to Include People With Disabilities on Both Sides of the Camera (Guest Column)

    In five years, nothing has changed. Despite open calls for greater diversity and inclusion, recent research shows that there was little change in the number of characters with disabilities in popular films in 2017. A study conducted by the Annenberg Inclusion Initiative of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism found that [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content