×
You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Shield of Anonymity

MEMO TO: Harvey Weinstein

Writing in the July issue of Premiere Magazine, you make a persuasive case against the growing reliance on “anonymous sources” in newspaper and magazine articles, and by and large, I agree with you. The trouble is, you should have waited until you’d read the rest of the issue, Harvey. A prime example of what’s wrong with anonymous sources appears only a few pages from your piece in the July Premiere. It’s an expose on the “fast and loose corporate culture” at New Line, which boils down to a series of character assassinations based on, guess what, “anonymous sources.”

Here is what John Connolly tells us about New Line in his lengthy story entitled “Flirting With Disaster”: Michael Lynne, the New Line president, once grabbed a young woman executive at a corporate retreat, slammed her against a wall and stuck his tongue into her mouth. Bob Shaye, the New Line founder and chairman, drinks so heavily that, at one New Line conference, he got up from the dinner table and passed out on a couch outside the dining room. Michael De Luca, the young president of production, distributed hallucinogenic mushrooms to colleagues at yet another corporate retreat. And so on.

Can you make a guess about the sourcing of these allegations, Harvey? They’re your old friends, those “anonymous sources.” There’s even a quote from the proverbial “former New Line executive,” who says, “There wasn’t a woman’s ass in my department that hadn’t been grabbed by Bob Shaye. He’s a pig.”

Now I don’t want to sound like a professional apologist for Bob Shaye and I’m also reluctant to criticize Premiere — James Meigs and Anne Thompson have done excellent work with the magazine.

Having said all that, I nonetheless get queasy when I read punitive quotes from “former executives” or angry employees who hide behind anonymity. As you said in your own piece, Harvey, “Unnamed sources often have malicious intentions. The dirty secret is that, more often than not, these sources wish to stay off-the-record because they are spinning a rumor that will likely hurt someone — usually to benefit themselves.”

Ask any top studio human resources executive about the recent rash of sexual harassment suits and they’ll tell you a shockingly high percentage are simply bogus, stemming from employees who are pursuing a vendetta or simply want to make a financial score. In the Premiere piece, are these unnamed “former executives” similarly motivated?

In his “Editor’s Letter,” Jim Meigs, editor-in-chief of Premiere, assures us that his magazine won’t use anonymous quotes unless the sources are “credible,” “authoritative” and have no “agenda.” That sounds fine, but how does the reader, or indeed an editor-in-chief, really know the agenda of a “former executive?” Do we have a letter from his psychiatrist attesting that he left New Line feeling just great about the company? It’s all reminiscent of those “leaks” in the Monica Lewinsky affair — the reporters always cite a “source” without bothering to tell you whether that source is Ken Starr or a White House apparatchik.

Show business is a high stakes game in terms of money and ego. There are always disgruntled individuals in and around these companies — people who feel they’ve been rejected or cast aside. Reporters could fill the pages of any newspaper with the bad-mouthing of top entertainment executives.

So here’s where I have to agree with you, Harvey — it’s dangerous to let anonymous quotes run wild. The problem is that the entertainment industry today has become a wholly owned subsidiary of multinational corporations. “Suits” are reluctant sources, and understandably so.

A clear distinction can be made in the use of these sources, however. If an executive wants to confirm a deal, or comment on an industry trend, it seems harmless enough to cite him anonymously. If, however, someone clearly wants to attack or undermine a rival, or a superior, that’s a vastly different issue.

Which brings us back to New Line. It’s no secret that the New Line corporate culture contrasts sharply with that of the multi-nationals, but is that something we should deplore? Isn’t there room in the business for an edgy company that gives us movies like “Seven” and “Boogie Nights?”

To be sure, there are limits to this indulgence. Sexual harassment, if and when it occurs, should not be tolerated in any humane company. Nor should the sort of lewdly antisocial acts committed by Michael De Luca at a Hollywood Oscar party — acts for which De Luca quite properly issued a public apology.

Having said all this, I think it’s also out of bounds to scorn the mavericks and the nonconformists in our business, even though one can find enough “anonymous sources” to fill a phone book.

Frankly, I find it all so depressing, I think I’ll pass out on Bob Shaye’s couch.

Popular on Variety

More Voices

  • Margot Robbie, Nicole Kidman, Charlize Theron.

    Charlize Theron Could Win Second Oscar for Playing Megyn Kelly in 'Bombshell'

    Charlize Theron walked on stage before a screening of “Bombshell” at West Hollywood’s Pacific Design Center on Sunday night and announced to the crowd, “I’m about to s— myself.” The Oscar winner had good reason to be nervous. The screening of the Jay Roach-directed drama about the fall of Fox News boss Roger Ailes was [...]

  • Tom Hanks Mr Rogers A BEAUTIFUL

    Tom Hanks' Portrayal of Mister Rogers May Put Him Back in Oscar's 'Neighborhood'

    Sony recently hosted a SAG-AFTRA screening of “A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood,” the Marielle Heller-directed drama starring Matthew Rhys as a magazine writer who befriends Fred Rogers, played by Tom Hanks. While the screening didn’t include a guild Q&A with cast or the film’s creative team, the audience was greeted with a video message from [...]

  • Joe Pesci, Al Pacino, Martin Scorsese,

    Martin Scorsese and 'The Irishman' Enter Oscar Race With World Premiere at NYFF

    Even with its three-hour run time and a short 28 days in theaters before it’s available on Netflix, Martin Scorsese’s “The Irishman” is likely to be a major contender at the Oscars. The 57th New York Film Festival opened on Friday night with the world premiere of the epic real-life mob drama. Scorsese and his [...]

  • Brad Pitt Once Upon a Time

    How Much Does Hitting the Awards Season Circuit Really Matter to Stars Like Brad Pitt?

    “Do you want an Oscar?” That’s the first question one top awards consultant asks any potential contender when they first start talking. Everyone is wondering how Brad Pitt would answer that question these days. He recently raised eyebrows and made headlines when he proclaimed that he would not be campaigning this awards season. “Oh, man. I’m [...]

  • Renee Zellweger'Judy' film premiere, Arrivals, Samuel

    'Judy's' L.A. Premiere: Renée Zellweger Takes Another Ruby Step Toward the Oscars

    Renée Zellweger continues to follow the yellow brick road to the Oscars. The Los Angeles premiere of Judy on Thursday night in Beverly Hills kept the Academy Award winner on track for a possible second win come February. “We’re just so happy we’re able to share it with you tonight,” Zellweger said to the crowd [...]

  • Barry Bill Hader

    Emmys 2019: Clear Favorites and Top Challengers for This Year's Winners (Column)

    If this felt like the longest, most expensive Emmy campaign in history, you might be right. For one thing, the 2019 Primetime Emmys will be held Sept. 22, which is the latest the ceremony has taken place since 2013. That also happened to be the last year of TV’s quaint, pre-streaming era, before outlets like [...]

  • Fleabag Succession Emmys

    Could 'Fleabag' and 'Succession' Be Spoilers on Emmy Night? (Column)

    At the onset, this year’s Emmy Awards felt a bit anticlimactic, as the final seasons of “Game of Thrones” and “Veep” appeared to have this year’s drama and comedy categories locked up before campaigning even began. But that’s how upsets happen: Just when we’re pretty confident about how things might go, a couple of wild [...]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content