Court rules against use of ‘Elvis’ moniker

Houstonians won't be eating at 'The Velvet Elvis'

In a decision that limits the parody defense in trademark infringement and right of publicity cases, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined a Texas restaurant from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.”

The decision reversed the lower court, which held that “Velvet Elvis” did not infringe trademarks held by the Presley estate.

Mark Lee of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips who represented Elvis Presley Enterprises said, “This is an important decision for Elvis Presley Enterprises and the law of parody. The opinion shows people cannot freely take others’ intellectual property rights and cry parody to justify their actions.”

The case was brought by Elvis Presley Enterprises, which owns all trademarks and publicity rights belonging to the Presley estate. It sought to prevent a Houston bar, which featured velvet paintings of Elvis, a frozen drink called “Love Me Blenders” and a hot dog named “Your Football Hound Dog,” from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.”

More Biz

  • Will Smith arrives at the U.S.

    Will Smith, Japanese Soccer Star Keisuke Honda Launch Dreamers Fund

    In a decision that limits the parody defense in trademark infringement and right of publicity cases, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined a Texas restaurant from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.” The decision reversed the lower court, which held that “Velvet Elvis” did not infringe trademarks held by the Presley estate. Mark Lee […]

  • Matt Sawin Capitol Music Group

    Caroline Names Matt Sawin Executive VP

    In a decision that limits the parody defense in trademark infringement and right of publicity cases, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined a Texas restaurant from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.” The decision reversed the lower court, which held that “Velvet Elvis” did not infringe trademarks held by the Presley estate. Mark Lee […]

  • Universal Music Group

    Universal Music Launches Nigerian Division

    In a decision that limits the parody defense in trademark infringement and right of publicity cases, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined a Texas restaurant from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.” The decision reversed the lower court, which held that “Velvet Elvis” did not infringe trademarks held by the Presley estate. Mark Lee […]

  • Bruno Mars Grammys

    Recording Academy Announces Date, Deadlines for 2019 Grammy Awards

    In a decision that limits the parody defense in trademark infringement and right of publicity cases, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined a Texas restaurant from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.” The decision reversed the lower court, which held that “Velvet Elvis” did not infringe trademarks held by the Presley estate. Mark Lee […]

  • The Matcha Bros

    Ansel Elgort, Diplo, Billie Eilish and Von Miller Invest in MatchaBar Energy Drink

    In a decision that limits the parody defense in trademark infringement and right of publicity cases, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined a Texas restaurant from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.” The decision reversed the lower court, which held that “Velvet Elvis” did not infringe trademarks held by the Presley estate. Mark Lee […]

  • Ron Burkle

    Ron Burkle Sues Lantern Capital Over Weinstein Co. Costs

    In a decision that limits the parody defense in trademark infringement and right of publicity cases, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined a Texas restaurant from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.” The decision reversed the lower court, which held that “Velvet Elvis” did not infringe trademarks held by the Presley estate. Mark Lee […]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content