‘Lord of the Rings’ Spoke to 1960s College Kids — and to United Artists

J. R. R. Tolkien
CAMERA PRESS/Bill Potter

Happy birthday, Frodo. J.R.R. Tolkien’s “Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring” debuted July 29, 1954; the next two books were published separately in the next 15 months. Tolkien’s popularity in the U.S. climbed significantly in 1965, when Ballantine printed a revised paperback edition.

When United Artists acquired film rights to “Rings” in 1969, Variety explained that the books’ success was fueled by students, adding that the trilogy “preceded marijuana and LSD in making the younger generation flip.” For years, “Rings” continued to fascinate but frustrate filmmakers. Among those who flirted with film adaptations were Walt Disney, John Boorman and the Beatles; Ralph Bakshi did a 1978 animated version. But a live-action version went nowhere until 1998, when Peter Jackson made a successful pitch to New Line’s Bob Shaye.

On Aug. 31, 1998, Variety announced that New Line would commit $130 million to perhaps the biggest gamble in the history of movies: Jackson would make three films simultaneously. If the first one flopped, it would doom the next two as well; this would be a financial disaster, especially for the overseas distributors who put their money on the line. The Variety story by Benedict Carver detailed the complex legal issues that had developed over the intervening four decades, as well as the artistic challenge of translating the scope of the three books.

Jackson told Variety that his vision for the films was both epic and personal. “My philosophy is that these are historical films, not fantasies or fairy tales. It’s a story with heart and soul, but also one that’s romantic.”

Carver added “Jackson acknowledges that he’s stepping into a potential firestorm by taking on a property as beloved as ‘Rings.’ ”

Shaye and New Line’s Michael Lynne and Rolf Mittweg committed to the project, but a key was studio exec Mark Ordesky, who was a fan of both Tolkien and the early films of Jackson. Ordesky made frequent trips between New Zealand, Los Angeles and New York as he oversaw 274 days of principal photography.

The first film opened Dec. 19, 2001, and was such a success that the post-production budget was increased for the other two, “The Two Towers” and “The Return of the King.” The production budget (before marketing costs) was finally estimated at $330 million, and the three films earned nearly $3 billion at the worldwide box office. (Jackson’s subsequent “The Hobbit” trilogy minted an additional $2.9 billion at the box office.)

Tolkien’s masterpiece proved that there were enormous audiences for fantasy works, far beyond the American students who embraced the books. The Tolkien trilogy paved the way for subsequent fantasy works in literature (e.g., the George R.R. Martin book series “A Song of Ice and Fire” aka “Game of Thrones”), videogames (“Dungeons and Dragons”) and films/TV works. In addition, Jackson’s storytelling and technology influenced legions of projects in the 21st century.

John Ronald Reuel Tolkien was 45 when he started writing the first “Rings,” as a sequel to his 1937 “The Hobbit”; he was 63 when the third novel was published. Though Tolkien died in 1973, his legacy continues; a posthumous novel, “The Children of Hurin,” was published in April 2007, and “Beren and Luthien” debuted June 1, 2017. The Toronto Star estimates that the Tolkien books have sold 150 million copies.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 5

Leave a Reply

5 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Kathy Berlin says:

    Hands down, the LOTR are my favorite movies and I watch them frequently. I have read the books many times and will continue to do so. While I am also a big fan of Jane Austen, particularly Pride and Prejudice and read fan fiction variations and sequels frequently, I have no desire to do the same with Tolkien’s works. Tjey are perfect just the way they are.

  2. Derek fleming says:

    Notice how Jackson said he considers these history and not fantasy? That’s because he knows what Tolkien knew, history is all a lie, including evolution and an earth without humans on it for billions of years. He based the Hobbit and all the names of the main characters names and all from an ancient Norse text that spoke of a quest sometime in an unknown history. He also knew, like Orwell , that the earth is flat. That the north pole is in the center and the south pole is the outer ring on the disk that is our earth. The powers at be now and then wouldn’t let you go to the center, nor the edge. Peasants have to stay in the middle ring, the middle earth. . And whoever rules the world is the lord of the rings

    • Timely Comment says:

      ?!??

      Think you’ve been hitting the pipe-weed just a bit too much…

    • Timely Comment says:

      Sure makes Icelandic/Germanic/Norse myths approachable than than their original sources to a reading teenager!

      The creative strength of Tolkien was collating and appropriating those existing stories and blending them together to serve HIS purposes. And his philological creation of the Middle Earth (and older) languages in LORD OF THE RINGS and SILMARILLION gave a heft and history to his works that Fantasists later copied in other works…

      The LOTR Saga goes ever on!

  3. Don Lewis says:

    Here’s to the storytellers!

More Vintage News from Variety

Loading