TV Review: Sally Wainwright’s ‘To Walk Invisible’ on PBS Masterpiece

To Walk Invisible: The Bronte SistersSunday,
Courtesy PBS Masterpiece

In the flood of spring TV options, it would be easy for “To Walk Invisible” to get lost. It shouldn’t be. 

“To Walk Invisible” will no doubt be catnip to a few different subcategories of TV fans: Those who enjoy costume dramas, those who can’t get enough of films about creative types, those who simply appreciate well-made films with strong but subtly conveyed points of view, and those who enjoy the work of Sally Wainwright, the creator of “Happy Valley.”

For those who fall into all four groups, “To Walk Invisible,” which serves up an intense glimpse into the lives of the Brontë sisters, will fly by.

At the outset, it’s important to offer a warning that also applies to the great Netflix series “Happy Valley,” one of the finest offerings in all of television: The Northern accents of the characters take some getting used to. I’ve spent enough time in the U.K. to consider myself fairly well acquainted with the various accents north of London, and I still find the cop show’s dialogue a little hard to follow at times.

Fortunately, the occasional “wait, what was that?” moments didn’t intrude much on my palpable enjoyment of “To Walk Invisible.” My only substantive complaint is that it’s not a miniseries; certainly the lives of the Brontës could fill up several seasons of TV (and maybe someday they will).

To ensure that the film is not overstuffed and ungainly, Wainwright wisely broke off only a small portion of the writers’ lives for this tart and insightful project. “To Walk Invisible” focuses tightly on a three-year period in which the Brontës decide to publish their work.  Their efforts were partly an attempt to forestall a financial crisis in the event of the death of their kindly but dithering father, the Rev. Patrick Brontë (Jonathan Pryce). Anne, Emily and Charlotte come vividly to life as they decide on their pseudonyms, engage with publishers via correspondence, and diligently crank out some of the works that eventually made them famous.

Rumbling through much of the drama is the darker twin of the story about a creative breakthrough. “To Walk Invisible” is also an honest and wrenching look at what it is like to live with an addict. Much of the mental, spiritual and physical energy in the Brontë house was expended on the sisters’ beloved but doomed brother, Branwell.

The word “doomed” is apt in a number of ways: It brings to mind the kind of noble, turbulent romanticism that the Brontës were known for, and the heedless Branwell possessed some of those qualities. As the opening of the film demonstrates, when they were children, he and his sisters had constructed fantastic worlds and shared mental universes that bonded them all in deep and unbreakable ways. One of the most subtle accomplishments of the film is that the sisters’ love for Branwell is always understandable, even when he’s at his worst — and as he falls deeper and deeper into alcohol and drug addiction, his worst becomes very challenging.

“To Walk Invisible” may be about a group of artists, but it is flinty in its realism and quite unsentimental about what Branwell’s decline was like to witness. The Brontës were far from rich, but they had a larger house than most, and somehow Branwell and his unstoppable decline managed to invade almost all of it. Even in the rooms he does not occupy, the sadness and tragedy of his situation is unavoidable, and the sisters’ glances at each other are enough to convey the weight of what they’re bearing. They love him, but everything he puts them through is not only painful, it takes them away from their life’s work (and the household tasks they were still expected to perform). Their ferocious frustration comes through in the fiction and poetry they did manage to finish before the untimely deaths of two of the sisters.

Wainwright expertly explores the idea that while the expectations for Branwell just about crushed him, the fact that nothing was expected of his sisters goaded them into acts of creation that burn with a fire that readers can still sense today.

“To Walk Invisible” also sketches a beautiful portrait of the sisters’ connection to the wild landscape around them; a love for the natural world of their beloved Haworth fed into the yearning richness of their work. The film makes it easy to wish for more stories about each sister and the individual experiences she went through before and after all three were finally published. At least we still have their poetry and novels, which allow us to be impressed, as Wainwright clearly is, by what these driven and compassionate women accomplished in such a short amount of time.

TV Review: Sally Wainwright's 'To Walk Invisible' on PBS Masterpiece

TV Movie: PBS Masterpiece, Sun. March 26, 9 p.m. 120 min.

Crew

Sally Wainwright, Faith Penhale, Matthew Read, Rebecca Eaton.

Cast

Finn Atkins, Chloe Pirrie, Charlie Murphy, Jonathan Pryce, Adam Nagaitis, Rory Fleck Byrne

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 13

Leave a Reply

13 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. True , I had to put on the words to understand it. It is about oasis of creativity that exists in their minds while the real world pains and crumbles them . It is also about a victory that lasts forever in literature .

  2. Susan Kirk says:

    Very disappointed with this production. Difficult to understand the dialogue. Editing was choppy and strange. I found the story, dismal and dark, as it plodded along. Turned it off after the first 45 minutes.

  3. ChrisO'Brien says:

    I always, always download english subtitles.

  4. Gwen ginocchio says:

    You’re right the accent takes getting used to and I don’t have the time or money to learn it. Could barely understand a word..got the just of it but I guess
    I’ll get the book.

  5. Jennie Ehrmann says:

    I had no trouble with the dialogue, as I always turn on closed captioning for British shows.

  6. Sally says:

    Just turn on the damned closed captioning and shut up already

  7. Julesma says:

    I came here to see if anyone else had great difficulty understanding the dialogue and am much relieved to know it wasn’t just me – I was so disappointed with the production.

  8. SheWhoIs says:

    The author wishes there was a miniseries on the Brontes. There is. It was made in the seventies for BBC. “The Brontes of Haworth.” It is still available.

  9. I, too, was very disappointed in this production – such a narrow view of their daily lives. Brilliant women reduced to raging volcanoes. The acting was so over-the-top, overwrought – cartoonish. Emily ,in particular chewed her words as if she was ripping apart the sinews of very tough meat! I’m surprised she didn’t choke. The dialogue, as others have pointed out, was largely incomprehensible. What a travesty.

  10. Marie says:

    Did not think I would be seeing this slice chosen. The horrible destruction of al alcoholic is know to many. Wished to see more of their relationship and drop the brother to more back ground. I hated it.

  11. Rose M. LaJudice says:

    IT was awful..did not understand one word. Charlotte looked like Harry Potter.

  12. It was awful. I couldn’t understand 75% of the dialogue. Terribly disappointed.

  13. Austin Gallaher says:

    Great writing, acting and direction. A truly remarkable example of television drama at its best!

More TV News from Variety

Loading