Locarno Film Review: ‘What Happened to Monday?’

'What Happened to Monday' Review: Stupendously

A ludicrous, violent, amusingly dumb sci-fi actioner from Tommy Wirkola that casts Noomi Rapace as septuplets battling a dystopian regime.

There is no strobe lighting in Tommy Wirkola’s new sci-fi film, which debuts soon on Netflix, but epileptics triggered by rhythmic, dazzling flashes of blinding stupidity should consider themselves warned away from “What Happened to Monday?” Max Botkin’s original script for this preposterous dystopian tale landed on the 2010 Black List, underwent a gender swap, a title change and a rewrite by Kerry Williamson, to end up so rife with plot holes it feels macraméed rather than written. However, in the hands of Wirkola (“Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters”), as well as star Noomi Rapace in her multiple turn as septuplets named for the days of the week (yes, “Monday” is a person here), it attains such a level of lurid brainlessness that cult reappraisal may happen at some point, after a decent interval of sober reflection has passed.

It is the Near Future and grievous overpopulation has led to overreliance on GM crops which cause abnormally high instances of multiple births. And so governments have instigated a draconian one-child policy by which any additional siblings born will be forcibly cryogenically frozen until an unspecified future date when everything will be copacetic. Nobody seems to notice that this cost-prohibitive cryo-program sounds a lot like a parent’s transparent assurance that Bingo the family dog has gone to live on a nice farm that no, you can never, ever visit. But why wouldn’t they have faith in Nicolette Cayman (Glenn Close), the program’s zealous director? Her shellacked hairdo and retinue of Aryan thugs alone simply scream “trustworthy.”

For reasons never very clear (a proviso that could preface any given line of plot description here), Willem Dafoe’s Terrence Settman decides to circumvent the Child Allocation Act and hide his seven granddaughters away. He develops a single cover identity — “Karen Settman” — that each sister takes on when allowed out of the apartment on the one day of the week corresponding to her name. Still with us? OK. Thirty years later, the combined skillset of Monday through Sunday, now all played by Rapace and differentiated by hairstyle and/or single character attribute (clever, blonde, bossy, sporty, etc.) much like the Spice Girls, has resulted in “Karen Settman” having an important job in finance.

But that job brings “Karen” into conflict with perma-smirking co-worker Jerry (Pål Sverre Hagen) who hints darkly that he “knows her secret” and could not more obviously be a smokescreen for the real baddie if he were played by an actual red herring. Then Monday mysteriously disappears, and Cayman’s interchangeably steroidal henchmen come after the remaining sisters. Why Cayman wants rid of the Settman Seven is explained — the very existence of these women “will destroy my credibility!” hisses multiple Oscar nominee Glenn Close, the steely glint of her eyes not quite obscuring the cartoon dollar signs therein. But why her bloodthirsty goons go about it in such piecemeal fashion is not, except that this way we get a lot of Noomi Rapaces fighting and dying in a lot of different ways. Indeed, anyone whose peculiar kink is watching Noomi Rapace sob open-mouthed in grief over a dead Noomi Rapace has quite the fetish object to enjoy.

Some nominative determinism is at work, such as with Sunday who is the religious one, Saturday who is the peroxided party girl and Friday, who wears glasses and does computers like a real Girl Friday. And when one’s attention wanders, it’s fun to relate the characters to the old “Monday’s child” rhyme or to “7 Days,” the 2000 megahit single by Craig David. But mostly the job of individualization is left to Rapace, who, in her gum-snapping sexpot persona as Saturday gets to utter the immortal line, “It’s called acting.” Indeed it is.

Approached with the right frame of mind, “Monday” is kind of a blast, but that’s not to suggest it is well-intentioned: Just check out the casual deployment of the c-word, iffily consensual sex scene (co-starring Dutch-Tunisian hunk Marwan Kenzari, recently cast in Disney’s live-action “Aladdin”) and explicit violence (as well as headshots, we get toilet-bowl face-smashings, finger-loppings, eyeball-gougings, knife-slashings and the immolation of small children).

We’re used to dumb-as-paint sci-fi actioners being cynical cash-cows that wear their contempt for their audience on the sleeve into which they snigger all the way to the bank. But Wirkola’s film is set apart by its almost heroic lack of self-awareness: Not only does it not realize how dumb it is, there’s a real sense that it thinks it’s smart. In fact it’s a whirlygig of inanely convoluted plotting, deeply dubious philosophy and shots of Noomi Rapace sliding glasses across tables to herself. You should probably watch it.

Locarno Film Review: 'What Happened to Monday?'

Reviewed in Locarno Film Festival (Piazza Grande), Aug. 5, 2017. Running time: 123 MIN.


(U.K.-U.S.-France-Belgium) A Netflix (in U.S.) release of an Impuls Pictures AG presentation of a Nexus Factory, Title Media, Vendome Pictures production, in co-production with SND Films. (International sales: SND Films, Amsterdam.) Producers: Raffaella De Laurentiis, Philippe Rousselet, Fabrice Gianfermi.


Director: Tommy Wirkola. Screenplay: Max Botkin, Kerry Williamson. Camera (color, DCP): José David Montero. Editor: Martin Stoltz. Music: Christian Wibe.


Noomi Rapace, Glenn Close, Willem Dafoe, Marwan Kenzari, Christian Rubeck, Pål Sverre Hagen, Clara Read, Tomiwa Edun, Cameron Jack, Cassie Clare. (English dialogue)

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 11

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. R says:

    Aug 19

    Actress was top notch, top of the line, fantastic. No sour cherries there at all. She did a phenomenal job.

    The movie was a poorly written script that is written for morons. I cannot decipher who Monday and Sunday are…No wait, should I take that back? Let me put it kindly and say aww, thanks for allowing me to follow along.

    I could have if the character development actually developed (it didn’t). A child gets her finger chopped off (spoiler alert)…by her grandfather. Whose grandfather would attempt that? No matter the regime! I get it. Fine. This scene added to the drama. It is simple emotional sting, and in a movie of this sort, that was cheap. A scene was created with some drama and a lasting impression due to emotional manipulatiom with terrible back story lasting a good minute…yes, entertaining but overall frightful and sad.

    This was a decent flick… for the costume change was sweet. And that was all. The only place this movie has is in your “hmm what tne heck drawer” since the (spoiler alert) evil sister dies but somehow gets the sympathetic applause.

    This was a classic good vs evil, pushed to the max flick where you basically don’t know what’s going on…in a bad way. It had a really back ending. If you would like to be satisfied, this is not the movie for you. Sorry. Move on.

  2. David says:

    It’s a decent enough sci-fi action thriller. Word to the wannabe-wise, trashing something doesn’t make you look cool or smart, just hateful.

  3. Brian says:

    I thought this film was fantastic! Like the best of Blade Runner meets Orphan Black meets Hinger Games. Good acting, fantastic setting and story, and some believable villians too. Pretty much every thing I want from Hollywood

  4. Edgar says:

    Just saw it and it was brilliant! Sounds like the reviewer dislikes herself for liking it more than actually disliking the movie. It is a little far fetched for sure, but it all fits together very, very well. The realistic action, heartbreaking loss and horribly dystopian setting all work together really well. And Noomi Rapace is fan-freaking-tastic as usual!

  5. Farfig Nugen says:

    Saw this movie at AFM. Incredibly entertaining. Sounds like the reviewer went in expecting Nolan or Villaneuve style uber serious sci-fi. This is from the man who directed Dead Snow movies. It’s a tongue in cheek, crazy original concept, wild ride. Sounds like the critic still enjoyed it though in spite of the bashing.

  6. SMH says:

    It always seems odd to me when reviewers take aim at a Sci-Fi film’s premise. It’s science-fiction, there are supposed to be out of the box premises. The review substitutes cheap shots and sneer for substantive discussion.

    “It thinks its smart”

    Hello teapot meet kettle…

  7. SMS says:

    This review is hysterical! (And apparently much more entertaining than the film.)

  8. Jim says:

    PLEASE CORRECT: “…the very existence of these women “will destroy my credibility!” hisses Oscar-winning actress Glenn Close”

    Glenn Close never won an Academy Award.
    She was only nominated 6 times.
    But, I agree, she should have won a long time ago…

    Sounds like a fun-high-concept-actioner to me.
    I don’t mind the ridiculous premise as long as it takes its own rules seriously.
    “The Matrix” was smart-dumb, too.

    You could argue, that this movie has at least a proper subject of importance:
    Overpopulation and birth-control are relevant and no fight in the Matrix
    will save us from it ;-)

More Film News from Variety