Cannes Film Review: ‘The Venerable W.’

'The Venerable W.' Review: Ashin Wirathu's
Courtesy of Cannes Film Festival

Barbet Schroeder completes his Trilogy of Evil with this chilling look at the Buddhist monk whose Islamophobic rhetoric is stoking ethnic cleaning in Myanmar.

“Evil” is one of those tricky words usually best avoided, since its quasi-mythological sense of moral absolutism tends to downplay the human agency involved. Yet as Barbet Schroeder well knows, there are times when no other term properly conveys the insidious nature of intolerance and carnage robed in the trappings of power. Following his 1974 documentary “General Idi Amin Dada” and 2007’s “Terror’s Advocate,” the veteran director completes his self-styled Trilogy of Evil with “The Venerable W.,” a deeply disturbing look at Burmese Buddhist monk Ashin Wirathu, whose abhorrent Islamophobic rhetoric has been at the forefront of Myanmar’s ethnic cleansing campaign against the Rohingya minority and other Muslims. The fact that Burmese atrocities continue to make the news (though not often enough) should help to secure festival and art-house play.

In some ways “Venerable W.” is closer to “Idi Amin” than “Terror’s Advocate,” since Wirathu, like Amin at the time of filming, still wreaks havoc in his home country (“Terror” subject Jacques Vergès was alive when Schroeder released the documentary, but most of the prominent legal cases he handled occurred in the past). The biggest difference between the three is that Schroeder had access to considerably more third-party footage, thanks in part to cell phones and You Tube. He still relies on the expected talking heads, but supplements that with plenty of chilling amateur video chronicling the impact of Wirathu’s noxious campaign to “purify” his country.

Who is Wirathu? A prominent monk who began spouting anti-Muslim propaganda in the 1990s. Such views aren’t new: The Rohingya represent approximately 4% of the population and yet have been targeted for centuries. Schroeder only briefly touches on the past, most specifically the mass population shifts in 1978, instead looking for the seeds of Wirathu’s intolerance. What’s especially troubling for the director is that the monk’s dehumanizing sermons seem to run counter to everything we associate with Buddhism, the religion of peace and enlightenment. Yet Wirathu’s Buddhism is a nationalist, racist and bloodthirsty ideology, leading to Time magazine placing him on their July 1, 2013 cover with the headline, “The Face of Buddhist Terror.”

In classic populist style, Wirathu stokes fears of racial infiltration, utilizing language usually reserved for animals to describe how Muslims are over-breeding and destroying the purity of Burmese bloodlines while taking over land and businesses. He also proclaims that the Rohingya are an invented minority with no legitimate right to Burmese citizenship. It’s all dangerous claptrap, imitating the lying propaganda that always accompanies genocide, yet when it comes from the mouth of a Buddhist monk, in a land where monks are revered, the hateful message readily finds mass acceptance.

Complicating matters is Myanmar’s political history and the military junta’s uneasy relationship with the religious community. When monks staged the 2007 “Saffron Revolution,” and three years later Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi was released from house arrest, the world assumed the country was heading in a more benign direction. Yet the terrorizing of the Rohingya community, passively watched by an army clearly told not to intervene, doesn’t jive with the image of either Buddhism or Suu Kyi. Perhaps the latter conundrum is too complex even for Schroeder, who mentions her abandonment of the Muslims without trying to explain how it is this supposed advocate for peace and democracy continues to deny that state-sanctioned ethnic cleansing is occurring, despite ample evidence.

Though Schroeder traces Wirathu’s Islamophobia to the rape and murder of a Buddhist woman in his hometown of Kyaukse, clearly the monk would have come to his hate-filled agenda without such a trigger. In interviews he comes across as calm and reasonable, adept at “alternate facts” (he even expresses enthusiasm for Trump’s presidency), but footage of him addressing his acolytes reveals a far more impassioned and bombastic figure, clearly in love with his power.

Schroeder also interviews monks who firmly disagree with Wirathu’s message of intolerance, as well as journalists Matthew Smith and Carlos Sardiña Galache, who’ve done much to draw the world’s attention to the ethnic cleansing. Oddly, only one member of the Rohingya community, Abdul Rasheed, is featured.

Sensitive viewers will find it difficult to watch some of the amateur footage, which doesn’t shy away from showing beatings, murders and burning bodies. Bulle Ogier provides the overly fey, breathless “Small Buddhist voice,” meant to speak for the religion’s better conscience. Music, as in “Terror’s Advocate,” is sparingly used but even then generally feels unnecessary.

Cannes Film Review: 'The Venerable W.'

Reviewed at Cannes Film Festival (Special Screenings), May 20, 2017. Running time: 100 MIN. (Original title: “Le Vénérable W.”)

Production

(Documentary – France-Switzerland) A Les Films du Losange release of a Les Films du Losange, Bande à Part Films, Arte France Cinema, RTS – Radio Télévision Suisse, SRG SSR production, with the participation of Arte France, Cine Plus. (International sales: Les Films du Losange, Paris.) Producers: Margaret Menegoz, Lionel Baier.

Crew

Director, writer: Barbet Schroeder. Camera (color): Victoria Clay Mendoza. Editor: Nelly Quettier. Music: Jorge Arriagada.

With

Ashin Wirathu, U. Zanitar, Kyaw Zayar Htun, U. Kaylar Sa, Matthew Smith, Abdul Rasheed, Carlos Sardiña Galache, U. Galonni. Voices of Bulle Ogier, Barbet Schroeder. (Burmese, French, English, Spanish dialogue)

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 6

Leave a Reply

6 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Ugyen says:

    Let’s just look at the events in Manchester. Perhaps Wirathu doesn’t want that sort of thing happening in his own country. It’s mind boggling why Europeans would want to spend their time demonizing a Buddhist monk when they Islamic radicals killing their people in their own own country.

    • kenjimoto says:

      The Muslims being killed in Myanmar, much to your delight, have already been there for hundreds of years. Please get back to us when you come up with some handy rationalizations of why YOUR group should be murdered and tortured for someone else’s vague peace of mind. That should be easy, right, for a lover of low-brow thinking like you? Great movie review, by the way. Have you considered this as a career? I mean, if it didn’t eat into your time as an apologist for genocide, of course.

    • Nay says:

      Most of the people in the west are well-educated, open-minded and they definitely have a sound and rational mindset that is very different from the people who are always defensive of people like Ashin Wirathu. These so called Europeans and many other reasonable people all over the world are well-informed and sensible enough not to generalize all Muslims as radicals. Even this documentary is not about “all Buddhists” or “all Burmese”. This is just about one person. Not about everyone who practices the same religion as he does. You see, they don’t generalize. Well, I don’t expect you to have that kind of mindset. Of course it’d be mind-boggling for you.

      • Ugyen says:

        @Nay, Please spare us your high browed, thinly veiled put downs and look at situation in hand . There has just been yet another attack in London, also inspired by the religion peace. To pretend that there is nothing wrong within the doctrine of Islam is to bury one’s head in the sand. Buddhist like Wirathu have never gone into other people’s land and blown people up in the name of the religion. There is not a single instance instance of this ever happening. Buddhists don’t usually have problems with other religious groups in most of the countries they live in around the world. There are hindus too in Myanmar, however they Buddhists seem to have no problems with them. Anyone who has seen the recent events unfold can see that there is probably a lot more to Wirathu’s story than what this movie presents.

  2. Thein Maung says:

    While western media demonize “truth sayers about Islam” like U Wirathu, where is the outcry about islamic extremist preachers and their protectors such as Saudi Arabia? Consider the news “Indian Islamic hate preacher Dr Zakir Naik who is currently wanted by Indian authorities for terrorist offences has been granted citizenship by Saudi Arabia”

More Film News from Variety

Loading