Film Review: ‘The Boss Baby’

The Boss Baby
Courtesy of DreamWorks Animation

Alec Baldwin is cutthroat perfection as the voice of a tyrannical executive infant, but this animated lark is stuck halfway between goofy low concept and Pixarish pretension.

It’s a routine feeling to want a movie to be smarter. Every so often, though, you may want a movie to be a little dumber — to be true to what it actually is. “The Boss Baby,” the jokey new 3D animated lark from DreamWorks Animation (it’s being distributed by 20th Century Fox), is a visually brisk, occasionally clever low-concept comedy that’s also trying, half-heartedly, to be some sort of Pixarish masterpiece. You may wind up wishing that it had been one or the other.

The title character is an insanely precocious, arrogant, walking-and-talking infant who dresses in a black business suit, carries a briefcase, has big marble eyes that narrow down to devious slits, and snaps out observations and demands in the mellifluous cutthroat voice of Alec Baldwin, who has a peerless gift for making bombs-away statements that don’t raise his pulse by a beat. The character, who is never called anything but Boss Baby, is a kick to look at, with a blockish head that’s nearly as tall as his body, and he gets to bark out a lot of lines like “Where’s HR when you need ’em?” or (upon being told that he hates someone) “Hate is a strong word. It’s the right word, but still…”

“The Boss Baby” was loosely inspired by Marla Frazee’s 2010 children’s book, and if the movie had simply had been a feature-length “Look Who’s Talking” riff about a tyrannical baby who’s running the household like a corporate titan (a perfect metaphor, of course, for how the parents of a newborn feel — he really is the boss), it might have been a perfect throwaway hoot. Back in 1989 and ’90, the critics were never too kind to the “Look Who’s Talking” films — they were held in contempt — but this critic, for one, found them more funny than not, and there is of course one fantastic talking baby in popular culture: the snobbish, irascible, hilariously merciless Stewie on “Family Guy” — the purest expression of Seth MacFarlane’s id on that show. As a character, Boss Baby is like an executive knockoff of Stewie, and though his lines aren’t as witty or adult scandalous, as long as you’re chuckling at his autocratic bravura, the movie is amusing enough.

But here’s what’s a little weird and overly complicated about it. In Frazee’s book, Boss Baby simply…is. (The same way that Stewie is.) In “The Boss Baby,” he arrives — from Baby Corp., a baby-making corporation in the sky that’s like an assembly-line version of Heaven — as the little brother of Tim (voiced by Miles Christopher Bakshi, and as the film’s grown-up, looking-back narrator by Tobey Maguire). Tim is a seven-year-old boy who thought that life was perfect when it was just him and his parents (voiced with generic sweetness by Jimmy Kimmel and Lisa Kudrow), crooning him to sleep with family renditions of “Blackbird.” But Tim, who indulges his penchant for make-believe by turning everything that happens to him into a story, is threatened by the new baby, because he’s suddenly not getting the attention he craves. To him, the infant is the enemy. So the whole tale we’re watching — of how Boss Baby comes in and takes over — isn’t actually happening. It’s Tim’s elaborate fantasy of what’s happening. Got it?

The conceit makes perfect sense, and doesn’t sound all that complicated, but it still makes your head hurt, because the director, Tom McGrath (of the “Madagascar” films), working from a script by Michael McCullers, tries to use the it’s-all-in-Tim’s-mind premise to turn “The Boss Baby” into a variation on “Inside Out”: not just a daffy comic trifle about an authoritarian tot, but a timeless tale of the imagination, and of how kids use it to ease their heartache. The trouble is, instead of taking us deeper into a child’s reality the way “Inside Out” did, “The Boss Baby” is at once overly busy and oddly detached from a child’s reality. The conceit stays locked on that one literal level (though occasionally we see what Tim’s parents see — just two kids playing), and so basically we’re watching an elaborately kooky junior buddy movie that pretends to be about “experience” but is really about throwing an overly arduous chase comedy in the audience’s face.

Commercially, there’s no reason that this shouldn’t work out just fine. “The Boss Baby” is blithe, fast-moving, and dazzlingly animated, with the kind of supple, light-reflecting surfaces that may remind you of the lustrous visual textures that Brad Bird brought off in “Ratatouille.” There are irresistible bits, like the opening Baby Corp. delivery sequence, or Boss Baby’s James Brown funk waddle out of his taxi, or a baby action sequence set to the theme from “S.W.A.T.,” or the moment leading up to the climactic sequence in Las Vegas that features a bunch of Elvis impersonators whose Fat Elvis patter is so slurry-cool it practically leaves words behind.

Yet there’s a reason “The Boss Baby” still feels standard issue and a wee bit tiresome. It has one of those relentless mechanical plot lines that’s all booby-trapped logistics — in this case, about how Boss Baby is on a mission from Baby Corp. to stave off an epidemic of puppy love. It seems the growing obsession with cute new dog breeds is draining away the love for babies, and at the Vegas Convention Center, it’s up to Boss Baby to gather intel on a new pooch about to be launched: a creature called the Forever Puppy whose endless adorability represents the ultimate threat. This is the definition of a clanking cartoon narrative that doesn’t matter because it doesn’t signify anything, emotional or otherwise. Whereas the plot of a movie like “Inside Out” — or, on a less heady but still artfully affecting level, “Finding Dory” or “Trolls” — has an organic undertow.

Will kids go for “The Boss Baby”? They’ll crack up at parts of it, like a grooming montage that features a bare-butt baby-powder fart, and they’ll enjoy the image of Boss Baby, with his ridiculous glowering command. So will adults. But he’s a character who deserves a better movie, one that’s more fun and less pleased with itself.

Film Review: 'The Boss Baby'

Reviewed at 20th Century Fox, New York, March 7, 2017. MPAA Rating: PG. Running time: 85 MIN.


A 20th Century Fox release of a DreamWorks Animation production. Producer: Ramsey Ann Naito.


Director: Tom McGrath. Screenplay: Michael McCullers. Editor: James Ryan.


Alec Baldwin, Miles Christopher Bakshi, Tobey Maguire, Jimmy Kimmel, Lisa Kudrow, Steve Buscemi, ViviAnn Yee.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 7

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. txpatriot says:

    Critics are paid to trash movies. Especially cartoons. I’ve seen it twice and loved it! I especially liked the soundtrack.

    Don’t make it out to be more than it is: a simple fun fantasy that will keep both you and your kids entertained for a couple of hours

  2. Kefu says:

    It makes me mad when I see comparison between DreamWorks and Pixar. Everyone should know that they are NOT the same company and will NEVER be the same thing! The point of this review is not entirely correct: IF DreamWorks tries to be Pixar, they will most likely flop, as Shark Tale suggested. IF DreamWorks tries to be themselves to build franchises such as Shrek, Kung Fu Panda and How to Train Your Dragon, they can do pretty well, sometimes even better than Pixar! DreamWorks should have learnt the lesson. Every studios have their own sets of advantage and they are completely different between DreamWorks and Pixar. Sure Pixar may produce movies with better storytelling, DreamWorks is better at expanding franchises than both WDAS (Walt Disney Animation Studio) and Pixar! What franchises does DreamWorks have? Shrek, Kung Fu Panda, How to Train Your Dragon, Madagascar just to name a few. What franchise does Pixar have? Toy Story (their flagship of course), and their weakest Cars (which doesn’t count as a franchise related to movies as much because the movies are just there to cash in!) And the reason Cars is a bad movie franchise is because Pixar took Walt Disney’s bad stuff and make weak sequels while WDAS stopped doing that and replaced them with more quality films which leads to WDAS’ comeback!

    • I don’t think Shark Tale is the best example of DW trying to be Pixar-ish. In fact I don’t think DW has ever wanted to be Pixar-ish. For better or worse I think they either tried to do their own thing (which generally delivers good artistic results if not the biggest at the box-office) or they try to keep on milking the Shrek formula, which sadly they milked out a long time ago.

      Then they now have a different problem, they are now owned by Universal and with each passing time it seems obvious that the Minions factory will try to make DW more like their new mother company: produce lighter and more slapstick-har-har-cheaper content. So far HTTYD3 seems to be the last remaining “serious” and emotionally driven animated feature in their line-up.

    • FS says:

      Most of what you said about Pixar is your OPINION, not fact.

  3. Yolernd says:

    This review is amateur. “Pixar-ish pretension”? Try harder Owen, this sounds more like dorm room discussion by theater students than a considered piece of film criticism.

    Could you review the movie without using the word Pixar as a lazy catch-all. Every time you want to use the word, instead try to assess the storytelling, visuals, pacing. Anything actually related to film instead of this lazy dog crap.

  4. Shane says:

    Hard to believe even Variety is incapable of reviewing a Dreamworks movie without mentioning Pixar at least 3 or 4 times. The inside out comparison is such a stretch.

  5. Jake says:

    Not a Trumpist, and know I should judge movies based on the final product; but not interested in anything with which AB is associated in any way. He and DT are both narcissists, just cut from different cloth. They feed off of each other.

More Film News from Variety