‘Van Wilder’ Stokes Legal Battle 15 Years After Release

Van Wilder Lawsuit
Myriad Pictures/REX/Shutterstock

The producers who brought “Van Wilder” to the screen 15 years ago are now engaged in a legal fight over who owns the distribution rights to the film.

Myriad Pictures filed suit Wednesday in L.A. Superior Court, seeking a declaration that it will take full rights to the film on the 15th anniversary of its release on April 4.

According to the lawsuit, Myriad contends that its partner in the project, Tapestry Films, engaged in secret negotiations with the distributor, Lionsgate, to extend the distribution agreement beyond the 15-year term. Myriad asserts that under the agreement, Tapestry was receiving 80% of the proceeds to just 20% for Myriad, though Myriad put up the financing for the film.

“The participation split is extremely favorable to Tapestry,” the lawsuit argues.

According to Myriad, Tapestry sought to extend the agreement in order to maintain the favorable split. However, Myriad insists that the full distribution rights should revert to Myriad next week under the distribution agreement.

Peter Abrams, a partner in Tapestry Films, said he had not received the complaint.

“I don’t know anything,” he told Variety.

The lawsuit notes that “Van Wilder” stars Ryan Reynolds in a breakout role, and “has proven popular with movie audiences on an ‘evergreen’ basis long after its initial release.”

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 3

Leave a Reply

3 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Lex says:

    Wow, a legendary film if ever there was one. So bad it sparked jokes about it. Between this film and Sorority Boys you can see need to produce 2 bad ‘Animal House”-esque films because they didn’t have anything like Animal House any more. First off, Animal House had no moral to it. It was a joke. Secondly, Sorority Boys was better.

  2. Okay, Gene, this article changed my life. It’s just that good! Good talk, good talk! Great movie, great copy. Good talk.

  3. Bret D says:

    “Nomi.That’s I Moan spelled backwards!”

More Film News from Variety

Loading