‘It,’ ‘Split’ and ‘Get Out’: Horror’s Star Continues to Rise at the Box Office

It
Warner Bros

“You’ll float too.”

The catchy tag line for the new film adaptation of Stephen King’s “It” might also apply to the egos of those behind the record-shattering box office hit (which must be about as inflated as Pennywise’s balloon). In its opening weekend, the R-rated horror film is expected to earn $117 million in North America. That’s the biggest opening ever during the month of September, and for a horror movie.

Jeff Goldstein, the distribution chief at Warner Bros., said he initially hoped for a launch around the film’s production budget — in the $30 million to $40 million range. “That would have been marvelous,” he told Variety on a call Sunday morning. “After we dropped the first trailer, we realized we had something special. It really took the zeitgeist by storm.”

Related

It

Box Office: Stephen King’s ‘It’ Smashes Records With Massive $117 Million Opening

The marketing certainly played a key role in establishing a memorable image (the clown and its big, red balloon), and building buzz — but there are other factors that also contributed to “It’s” box office success. For one, the month of August left audiences starved. Even King fans still had an appetite after watching “The Dark Tower” come and go. Then, for the rest of the month, few releases posed a threat to medium-sized hits “Annabelle: Creation” and “The Hitman’s Bodyguard.” The movie also centers on a well-known — yet seemingly universally terrifying — character, carries an R rating, and comes complete with King’s sign-off.

For a film that cost an estimated $35 million to produce, “It’s” domestic launch is already more than three times that. But it’s not just “It.” Horror films — which often require less special effects, and don’t lean on well-known actors — are known for reaping major returns. Earlier this year, Blumhouse made a major statement with two low-budget films, “Split” and “Get Out,” that did just that.

Related

It trailer record

5 Lessons ‘The Dark Tower’ Could Learn From ‘It’

The first was redemption for director M. Night Shyamalan, who had struggled with big-budget flops “The Last Airbender” and “After Earth.” “Split,” even more so than 2015’s “The Visit,” played to the director’s strengths — a compelling, terrifying story (even while carrying a PG-13 rating), with twists and turns, made for very little. The movie went on to earn $138.2 million domestically off a $9 million budget. Then, “Get Out,” which was a different set-up with a similar outcome. From first-time director Jordan Peele, the R-rated horror film, with a dose of comedy, caught the zeitgeist and made $175.5 million off a $4.5 million budget. And that’s without even accounting for international appeal.

To be clear, a horror release in 2017 is far from a sure thing. The July release “Wish Upon” was a relatively low-risk $12 million movie, but only made back $14 million. And who could forget the botched viral marketing campaign for “A Cure for Wellness” that left a $40 million production with only $26.6 million in receipts? Next weekend, the highly-polarizing “Mother!” starring Jennifer Lawrence hits theaters, but its fate seems uncertain. That’s not to mention the myriad of indie horror pics that barely make a blip in the social consciousness. But the highs for horror this year have been so high, and frequent enough, that they are difficult to write off.

After a disastrous summer at the domestic box office, superhero movies came away looking like the most reliable subgenre the industry has. But even as some of the year’s highest-grossing movies, “Wonder Woman,” “Spider-Man: Homecoming,” and “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2” all have to balance massive budgets. They all made up for the price tags handily, but horror still presents a much lower risk.

What gets people into theaters? Talk to any studio chief and you get the same answer — good storytelling. Part of what makes a film successful, particularly in 2017, is the “event” factor, like the one Christopher Nolan created with his campaign that “Dunkirk” was meant to be seen on the big screen. The horror films that have worked have tapped into that desire to be a part of something. If the genre continues to have that effect, expect to see more and more drift into theaters in the near future.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 10

Leave a Reply

10 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Adi Martiana says:

    To Watch It 2017 Full Movies Online Streaming HD Quality torrent downloader
    Click here >> http://iflix-hd.ga/movie/346364/

  2. Pique says:

    To Watch It 2017 Full Movies Online Streaming HD Quality torrent downloader
    Click here >> http://hd.spacemove.us/movie/346364/it.html << Enjoy

  3. Steve says:

    If this is any indication of the mindless tripe the future holds, $20 a pop at the theater will be but a memory as will theaters.

  4. gouparchery says:

    im so scary

  5. Spike says:

    To hell with all you horror whores. This world is threatening enough without your crap on the screen. You are not too far from car hijackers and drug pushers. You have no social responsibility and think only of yourselves and your bank accounts which you can fatten with the blood of onscreen victims. Rot in the hell the whole lot of you.

    • N says:

      Jesus, you’re daft. If you have any idea on what horror films historically have done for cinema, and what they have critiqued about culture on a larger scale, you’d actually know your comments are far off the mark, chief.

      Many of the classic horror films are a scathing critique of a cultural movement in real life when they were released; everything from the communist scare to the complacency of Americans.

      So please do some research before making further inane comments.

    • Jacen says:

      So I guess you’d much prefer movies, television, books, art, and songs that feature nothing but happy stuff like trees and flowers and chirping birds and basket weavers who sit and smile and twiddle their thumbs and toes and they’re COMING TO TAKE ME AWAY, HAA-HAAAAA!!!!!!!!!

  6. Spider says:

    Yes, storytelling is one significant component, but it doesn’t guarantee big box office… Marketing is an even larger factor in that WB played up the ‘Stephen King’ factor along with the proper image to associate the movie with. The image of Pennywise peeking at the little boy in the yellow raincoat through a big, red balloon helped to heighten awareness in the public’s consciousness. Same associations were made for Shyamalan’s “Split”, and Peele’s “Get Out”. Even, going back to last year; the same could be said for “The Conjuring 2”, “Lights Out” and “Don’t Breathe” which had really excellent marketing campaigns. It helped a lot that the flicks were pretty good, too… One recent example of good storytelling is “Wind River” that is making steady money at a moderate pace, due to word-of-mouth —as this film had no marketing campaign, therefore, the numbers are just not huge. Great movie, though!…. It’s a little baffling that a film with Jeremy Renner and Elizabeth Olsen (2 of Marvel’s ‘Avengers’) didn’t get a marketing campaign. This movie deserves to have bigger box office.

  7. Paul says:

    These three horror films might be a run of box office exceptions as each had a unique selling point. ‘It’ is the original Stranger Things, a popular Stephen King book which remained untapped for cinema. ‘Split’ had a tour dear force performance from a a-list movie star which is not usually seen in low budget horror. And ‘Get Out’ challenged the movie goers’ perceptions on racial stereotypes in cinema. I don’t think these successes will be easily replicated.

    • Movieguy says:

      It seems like the lesson is always just to copy at the most basic. Some horror movies were hits? Greenlight a ton of horror. Superhero movie are successful? Do everything you can to get a superhero movie franchise. It’s much easier to copy than it is to make smart creative movies that appeal to audiences simply because they are somewhat compelling, very watchable movies.

More Film News from Variety

Loading