Ian McKellen Says It’s ‘Un-American’ for Trump Not to Protect Gay Rights

During an interview at the Variety Studio in Cannes Lions, the actor Ian McKellen had harsh words for President Donald Trump if he fails to follow through — as seems to be the case — on a campaign promise to protect the rights of the LGBT community.

Asked about the administration’s attempts to roll back gay and transgender protections, McKellen said, “If what you’re saying is true, it’s appalling and quite unnecessary and very un-American. The gay rights movement began in America. It began in San Francisco, it began in Stonewall, the city where Donald Trump was born and thrived.”

The White House has refused to acknowledge June as Pride Month. In March, Trump quietly rolled back an Obama-era rule, Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order. Many argue that the move leaves female and LGBT employees of federal contractors venerable to discrimination.

Related

Alicia Silverstone Mena Suvari

Alicia Silverstone on Why She’s ‘Super Proud’ of ‘Clueless’

McKellen, the most recent openly gay actor to be nominated for an Oscar, admitted he’s not sure what Trump believes. “I can’t follow Mr. Trump,” McKellen said. “I don’t always understand what he says and when I do, I have to admit later that I got it wrong because he changed his mind or changed his mind about what he said. He’s a very bad communicator, at least to me. Get more straightforward, Donald. And then we can take you seriously.”

McKellen arrived at the annual advertising conference in the South of France with an initiative, co-sponsored by the creative agency the Brooklyn Brothers and TV production house Brown Eyed Boy, to solicit short films that re-imagine iconic characters as gay (winners will be broadcast on Facebook).

The actor known for playing Magneto in the “X-Men” franchise spoke about the lack of gay characters in major Hollywood tentpoles. “I wouldn’t say the films coming out of the mainstream are quite as related to what’s going on in the real world as I would like them to be,” McKellen told Variety. “One indication of that is LGBT people don’t really get quite a big enough say. If you’re one of those initials yourself, you do notice that actually these movies are not about me at all.”

Hollywood has yet to greenlight a comic-book movie anchored by a gay superhero. “Frankly looking at the images of some of these superheroes it’s a surprise to me they aren’t gay,” joked McKellen.

He expressed disappointment that his costume for Magneto isn’t quite as flamboyant as it was in the comics. “I wasn’t allowed to wear that outfit,” McKellen said. “I don’t look like Magneto in the comics — always shot from the crotch level.”

McKellen had a suggestion for rebooting the James Bond franchise with a gay 007. “I do have an idea,” McKellen said. “I think Ian Fleming, who wrote the original books, knew all about [it]. I’m not sure subsequent actors have quite understood the joke, which is the same as Superman. James Bond is a wimp! He’s a silly Englishman that wants his martinis stirred. He changes his underwear, like Superman, and he can save the world. They all play it the same — he’s heroic all the way through. No, he’s not.”

“If you play James Bond as an outwardly camp, silly gay man that no one took seriously and then he turned out as many gay men are underneath their clothes — buff and strong and as hetero as any hetero — we might have a more truthful story than the one that has been told,” McKellen said.

Would he want to play this new Bond? “I’m not volunteering,” he said. “I’m insisting. No, I’m too old to play it. I can be on the periphery of this new version.”

With all the recent talk of diversity at the Oscars, one statistic still goes unnoticed. There hasn’t been an openly gay actor nominated for an Oscar in 15 years — since McKellen was recognized for his work in “Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring” as the wizard Gandalf.

“It’s hard isn’t it?” McKellen said. “It’s probably because there are few remaining very talented actors who aren’t quite out of the closet in the way one would like for them to be for their own health and good. I don’t think there’s anything sinister about it. I was only the second openly gay man to receive a knighthood. Records are being broken day by day.”

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 7

Leave a Reply

7 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Pete says:

    ” Many argue that the move leaves female and LGBT employees of federal contractors venerable to discrimination.”

    It would be even worse if it left them vulnerable to discrimination.

  2. Janice says:

    Trump is winning too much to get involved with this.

  3. JOE S HILL says:

    McKellan is indeed a fine actor and worth his weight in gold, but his LGBT sentiments need to be addressed somewhere else! yes, liberal Hollywood welcomes this phony baloney fake civil right, and everybody’s all Gay buddy buddy here, but that’s not how reality works. Homosexual behavior and its lifestyles have absolutely NOTHING to do with either our Constitution let alone the White House, and all this other bullshit about why their rights and values are suddenly so important. the Trump Administration took the wise course in distancing themselves. but we have President Obama to thank for this since he abused his CIC powers to cater to this group. The LGBTQ movement is still facing serious obstacles, reality for one, and it continues to divide and undermine our country! they got their right to marry each other, thanks to a really screwed-up Supreme Court ruling, and that should’ve been enough, but they want more rights, more special interests, and other things, that are simply NOT possible! the Homosexuals are not related to Race and Color and are not relevant to anything special, other than their need to have more rights than other people have, but when their rights are imposed in a highly divided society and come into conflict with other people who don’t agree with their same sex values and behaviors, then that’s where the problems begin! Ian McKellan is a great actor, but he really needs to keep his Gay views to himself and do the work that he’s paid to do, like all the other actors should do!

  4. tlsnyder42 says:

    The U.S. Constitution does not mention “gay” rights, but it does say that ALL U.S. citizens have the right to due process before their life, liberty or property are taken away by the federal government. Enshrined in the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments, this right makes no acknowledgement of one’s sexual preference, one’s race, one’s sex (male or female), one’s country of origin, one’s ethnicity, one’s opinion, or one’s economic status or class.

  5. nohw says:

    What rights would that be exactly? Gays already have the same rights as everyone else. Pushing the gay lifestyle on everyone is not promoting rights; it is stripping away the rights of anyone who disagrees.

  6. Michael anthony says:

    It’s even MORE UN-AMERICAN to pick and choose which passages suit your beliefs. It works both ways.
    Better yet, toss the bible. Our constitution doesn’t require anybody to adhere to any of it. One would think you’d already know that. Got it, mate?

    • Truth says:

      No Michael Anthony, you cannot trample on people of faith’s rights by tossing out the Bible so that you can feel better about engaging in perversion.

More Film News from Variety

Loading