Early ‘Beauty and the Beast’ Reviews: What the Critics Are Saying

BEAUTY AND THE BEAST
Courtesy of Disney

It’s a tale as old as time, with songs as old as rhyme, but how does the new re-telling of “Beauty and the Beast” stand up compared to its legendary 1991 ancestor?

According to early reviews of Disney’s latest edition, which stars Emma Watson and Dan Stevens in the title roles, the film has a few thorns and falling petals, which detract from the overall beauty of the rose.

While critics have found some recent remakes of Disney classics, such as “Maleficent” and Jon Favreau’s “The Jungle Book” to be worthy additions to magical world of Disney, others, like “Alice in Wonderland,” have been briskly panned. A major question for reviews of “Beauty and the Beast” to answer is, “Which camp does the film fall into?”

Related

Beauty and the Beast Premiere

Josh Gad Addresses Gay ‘Beauty and the Beast’ Character at L.A. Premiere: ‘It’s Important’

Variety’s Owen Gleiberman:

“Is the movie as transporting and witty a romantic fantasy as the animated original? Does it fall crucially short? Or is it in some ways better? The answer, at different points in the film, is yes to all three, but the bottom line is this: The new “Beauty and the Beast” is a touching, eminently watchable, at times slightly awkward experience that justifies its existence yet never totally convinces you it’s a movie the world was waiting for.”

The Guardian’s Peter Bradshaw:

“This movie is allegedly updating its assumptions to include a gay character…while leaving the heterosexual politics untouched. Beastly ugliness is symbolic of tragic male loneliness even as the imprisoned pretty woman submissively redeems her captor’s suffering. The Shrek twist on this scenario has more of a sense of humour: the woman becomes ugly as well.”

New York Times’ A. O. Scott:

“There are a few moments — a climactic high-elevation fight scene that looks like every other climactic high-elevation fight scene; a chase through the forest involving wolves — where the digital seams show, and you’re aware of the cold presence of lines of code behind the images. Most of the time, though, you are happily fooled. More than that: enchanted.”

USA Today’s Brian Truitt:

“Watson’s singing is shaky early on with the signature Belle, though she settles into her feisty character who has no patience for illiterate brutes like uber-macho town hero Gaston (Luke Evans). Stevens’ Beast is created through visual effects wizardry, but he finds the right balance between the despair of his pre-Belle days and the good-hearted, surprisingly witty dude he later becomes.”

IndieWire’s Jude Dry:

“The film that opens in theaters this weekend remains faithful to its source material, with glimmering costumes and sets that feel like Disneyland. Condon (“Kinsey,” “Dreamgirls”) practically follows the animated film shot for shot, filling in as necessary for added exposition and a few extra songs. At 129 minutes, compared to the original film’s 110, Condon’s version feels overstuffed. It also feels like that scene in the animated original when the servants dress the Beast for dinner with Belle, powdering his face and fluffing his hair until he looks ridiculous and completely out of place.”

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 2

Leave a Reply

2 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Lloyd Stiles says:

    Beauty and the beast 2017 was a very good film. We rented it for a family movie night. I thought Emma did a wonderful job as well as the other actors. The ending was very warm and full of joy. However, I am very disappointed and a bit offended. I wish there were warnings of the “lgbt” (trying not to offend here) activity. I personally don’t care what people choose to do with their lives. It is their decision. I just don’t wish these things to be brought into my living room unbeknownst to me. I raise my family with Christian values and that is my right. I wish and propose that there are additional labels put on movie cases to let me know that there might be this sort of content that I may have to explain to my eight year old son…… Was a very awkward moment for my family and I. I understand people of the world choose different lifestyles now days but again there are still traditional people left, and noone is to tell someone their feelings are right or wrong.

  2. Christine Dolan says:

    After reading the critics’ comments on the new Beauty and the Beast Live Action film, I am more convinced than ever that pjrofessional movie critics have no idea of what the average movie goer is looking for from a movie. The fact that the film has broken all kinds of records and has passed the 1 billion dollar mark in total ticket sales speaks for itself.

More Film News from Variety

Loading