Academy Rescinds Sound Mixing Oscar Nomination for Violation of Campaign Regulations

13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of
Courtesy of Paramount

The Academy announced on Saturday, the day before Oscar Sunday, that Greg P. Russell’s sound mixing nomination for “13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi” has been revoked for “violation of Academy campaign regulations.” Gary Summers, Jeffrey J. Haboush and Mac Ruth remain sound mixing nominees for the film.

“The decision was prompted by the discovery that Russell had called his fellow members of the Sound Branch during the nominations phase to make them aware of his work on the film, in direct violation of a campaign regulation that prohibits telephone lobbying,” the release said.

Related

Who Should Win the 2017 Oscars? How Variety’s Critics Would Vote

“The Board of Governors’ decision to rescind Mr. Russell’s nomination was made after careful consideration,” Academy President Cheryl Boone Isaacs said in a statement. “The Academy takes very seriously the Oscars voting process and anything – no matter how well-intentioned – that may undermine the integrity of that process.”

According to the release, Academy rules state that “contacting Academy members by telephone to promote a film or achievement is expressly forbidden, even if such contact is in the guise of checking to make sure a screener or other mailing was received.”

Related

Artisans who create the Oscars

FINAL OSCAR PREDICTIONS

The decision was made after a vote on Thursday by the Academy’s Board of Governors, upon recommendation by the Sound Branch Executive Committee.

After the decision, the sound mixing nominees for the 2017 Academy Awards are Bernard Gariepy Strobl and Claude La Haye for “Arrival”; Kevin O’Connell, Andy Wright, Robert Mackenzie and Peter Grace for “Hacksaw Ridge”; Andy Nelson, Ai-Ling Lee and Steve A. Morrow for “La La Land”; David Parker, Christopher Scarabosio and Stuart Wilson for “Rogue One: A Star Wars Story”; and Summers, Haboush and Ruth for “13 Hours.”

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 9

Leave a Reply

9 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. There is something out of whack when a below-the-line craftsman’s nomination is rescinded because of a few phone calls, yet a big film can spend millions promoting their product and that’s ok. I don’t doubt the intentions of the Academy, who are trying to maintain voting integrity, but the result is to make the world a safer place for deep pockets.

  2. John says:

    That’s the right decision. What he did was simply unfair and manipulative. There have to be rules against this.

  3. Jaun Percenter says:

    This is like a Hollywood movie plot where we know all of the big guns are doing it, but they sacrifice a lower level underling to make a statement in the press.

  4. Fred says:

    Does Chill Willis still sit on this committee ?

  5. Nanny Mo says:

    Who wants to bet that if Greg had been a woman or a minority, they would have over-looked it? The academy today is a shell of what it used to be.

More Film News from Variety

Loading