Home Entertainment 2016 Figures: Streaming Eclipses Disc Sales for the First Time

DVD Placeholder

If the studios are looking for a fresh reminder of their pressing need to adjust theatrical distribution windows, the figures released Friday on U.S. home entertainment spending for 2016 are just the thing.

Two unprecedented trends emerged in the annual numbers reported by the Digital Entertainment Group, a trade org that collects the numbers from studios and retailers on a quarterly basis, that cast a dark cloud over the future of ownership of packaged video content, both physical and digital.

The first is that disc sales were eclipsed by subscription streaming numbers for the first time ever. The $5.4 billion in disc sales fell well short of the $6.2 billion tabulated from SVOD providers like Netflix.

The high margins of disc sales, which are traditionally the biggest revenue stream for what the DEG describes as “U.S. home entertainment spending,” had been a big but rapidly declining contributor to studios’ bottom lines.

Disc sales were down nearly 10% versus 2015 while subscription streaming surged almost 23%. Interestingly, however, the latter figure represents a cooling off from back-to-back 25% levels of growth in this category going back to 2014. While that might represent a maturation of SVOD consumption in the U.S., the reporting of this category by the DEG is likely dramatically undercounting considering the figures do not include what is probably the second biggest revenue contributor to subscription streaming, Amazon Prime.

However, that SVOD is among the revenue streams counted by DEG as U.S. home entertainment spending at all has always been a source of criticism for several reasons, primarily because disc revenues are being cannibalized precisely because of subscription streaming, which provides a much lower margin to the studios.

DEG tried to put a positive spin on the numbers by noting that the total U.S. home entertainment spend is up 1.36% to $18.3 billion versus 2015, which saw a lesser increase over 2014. But when subscription streaming is pulled out that number falls to just over $12 billion–a 6% decrease versus the previous year.

The second big change in this year’s numbers may be even more disturbing to the studios. For the first time ever, spending on electronic-sell-through, or EST, which totaled just over $2 billion, was edged by VOD by just $67 million.

Once propelled by the push of an early window marketed in recent years by the studios as Digital HD, EST platforms like iTunes grew just 5.4% over 2015–a dramatic drop from the  18% growth of 2015 and 30% rate of 2014.

EST was supposed to be the place where the industry converted former fans of discs to a style of digital ownership where viewers could easily download titles from the cloud through initiatives like the Ultraviolet system. But the growth of VOD is a sign that the rental model for single title transactions is persevering on digital too.

DEG also touted the growth of 4K HD products and named “Deadpool,” “Finding Dory” and “Zootopia” among the hottest selling titles of the year, but did not provide specific numbers.

The declining home entertainment industry has been cited by studio chiefs recently as an impetus to reconfigure how quickly theatrical movies segue to availability in U.S. homes via streaming.



Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 1

Leave a Reply

1 Comment

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Max says:

    Look, we are entering an era, when privacy is gone, bad movie franchises keep reigning, and Disney keeps making billions off their movies. What’s worse is that last year, Disney has announced a HORRIBLE sequel to “Wreck-It Ralph” under the name “Ralph Breaks the Internet: Wreck-It Ralph 2”, (They should have called it “Wreck-It Ralph 2: Ralph Breaks the Internet”) this means that characters from the movie will be appearing in some Nintendo Switch games and appearing in some websites! (I don’t want any characters from the movie appearing with Mario and/or Homestar Runner) The truth is that “Wreck-It Ralph” is not a good film, because that is not right, video game villains are supposed to be evil, while video game heroes are supposed to be good. The reason they [Disney] made it good, I think, is that “Shrek” was a VERY popular film franchise, and they wanted to make a franchise like that to compete with. In fact, it is all Steven Spielberg and John Williams’ fault, Spielberg never should have found “Shrek!” in the first place, and Williams never should have listened to his sons. Also, “Despicable Me” and “Megamind” are not one of the two, they’re just ORIGINAL ideas. And for DVDs, you should NEVER listen to another word for “rivering”, just buy them, and evrything will be okay.

More Digital News from Variety