Roman Polanski’s Effort to Dismiss Rape Case Rebuffed Again by Judge

Roman Polanski
James Gourley/REX/Shutterstock

For the second time in four months, Judge Scott Gordon on Friday refused to dismiss the 40-year-old rape case against director Roman Polanski.

In his ruling, Gordon reiterated that no deal can be worked out before Polanski returns to the U.S. and submits to the court’s authority. Gordon made the ruling in spite of the pleas of Samantha Geimer, who was 13 when Polanski raped her in 1977, and who urged Gordon to set the case to rest once and for all “as an act of mercy to myself and my family.”

“The defendant in this matter stands as a fugitive and refuses to comply with court orders,” Gordon wrote. “As eloquently described by Ms. Geimer, his conduct continues to harm her and compounds the trauma of the sexual assault committed against her that gave rise to this case.”

Polanski, 84, has lived as a fugitive in Paris since fleeing California in 1978. He had already pleaded guilty and served 42 days at Chino state prison for a psychiatric observation, but had not been sentenced. According to his attorneys, he feared that Judge Laurence Rittenband would cave to political pressure and renege on a deal to serve no additional time.

As a French citizen, Polanski is not subject to extradition to the U.S. Courts in Poland and Switzerland have also refused to extradite Polanski. However, the director remains subject to an international red notice, which makes it difficult for him to travel.

In the last six months, Polanski has made several efforts to dispose of the case. Harland Braun, his attorney, has accused the court system of conspiring to mistreat his client, has filed motions seeking to unseal a prosecutor’s transcript, and sought to compel the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office’s to disclose its position on sentencing.

The D.A.’s office countered that Polanski’s attorneys are relitigating issues that previous judges have already dealt with, and argued that Polanski cannot try his case “from afar.”

At a hearing in June, Braun told the judge that he had “done everything I can to resolve this case.”

“Well, with one exception,” the judge countered — referring to the possibility that Polanski could come to court.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 3

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Emilia says:

    He has many other victims who have not come forward, due to the unwanted public attention, that this weird little man seems to reveal in, all at the emotional expense of the victim, it takes years to get through an unwanted physical attack. If this is their idea of power and control, it is not. it is the act of a coward, Man, woman or child, if it was not rape then why does he have to use the drugs.
    No one wants him in this country, it is like a giant slap in the face, he deserves to live in exile for the rest of his life, he does not deserve to be around kind, and decent people, who would never even think a thought of this nature , let alone act it out. How can we have a safe and happy country, with sexually insane perverts running around, and what type of message does this send to the next generation, influencing them that this type of behavior is o.k because it is not.

  2. IT--//--IT says:

    Polanski’s Hollywood works now emerge as inside jokes
    on the RED CHINA handover TREASON op
    and the submersion–ascendancy – –of USURY–INTEL’s – – — USA Inc.

    Just get a load of the dream sequence from his 68 ‘Rosemary’s Baby’

    It’s filled with running Kennedy HOAX jokes

    Take a look !

    BEHOLD !

  3. The issue here is not a matter of trying Roman Polanski as a rapist from “afar” but the more immediate flight from U.S. justice. Polanski is “a fugitive” which will not be resolved until he has returned to U.S. custody. Then, the case of rape in sodomizing a minor may be adjudicated.

    A victim may forgive the perpetrator of a crime but once the admission to the court has been made, such forgiveness is moot. And a psychological evaluation is not sentencing for the crime itself.

    The logic, of course, is being ignored.

More Biz News from Variety