Is Tabloid Gossip Hurting Brad Pitt’s ‘Allied’ at the Box Office?

Allied Movie Brad Pitt
Courtesy of Paramount Pictures

People have always craved gossip about movie stars. In the age of Hedda Hopper and Photoplay, the gossip was generally orchestrated (and often just made up) by the studios, as a way to control the stars’ images

Today, in the age of TMZ and InTouch, the power of gossip has shifted. In one way, stars now manage and manipulate their own images. In another way, they’ve lost all control, as they fight to live inside a digital-media fishbowl of scandals and paparazzi images that ricochet around the planet.

For fans, the tidal wave of gossip — some accurate, much of it fake — has swelled exponentially; so has the anything-goes voyeuristic luridness of it all. Yet something else has expanded as well: the sense that the off-screen stories we’re reading about — “Ben and Jen, still together!” “Mila’s baby bump!” — are no longer just an extension of the stars’ images. Those stories have become a kind of real-life movie, one that’s frequently more addictive than the movies themselves. (Quick, which movie would you rather see: “Batman v Superman,” or “Jen Is Pregnant Again, and Ben Swears He’ll Quit Drinking and Gambling?”) The tale in the tabloids is now threatening to become the tail that wags the movie-star dog.

Over Thanksgiving weekend, Brad Pitt had a major new film come out — “Allied,” a WWII romantic espionage thriller in which he stars with Marion Cotillard. Is there still a big audience for a movie so knowingly old-fashioned that its first half is set in Casablanca? Thus far, the box-office grosses for “Allied” have been … OK.

That aside, here’s another movie we can all agree is a smash hit: “The Breakup of Brangelina.” Have you seen it yet? It has everything! A great love story — between the two sexiest people in the world — that turned into a messy divorce; rumors of adultery, substance abuse, eating disorders, and a mental breakdown; and a custody fight! The riveting climax hinged on an accusation of abusive behavior, which the courts determined to be groundless. (Quick, would you rather see this movie, or “Allied”?) For a while, “The Breakup of Brangelina” was even playing on a double feature with something called “Brad and Marion: What Really Happened on That Set?” That one may have been entirely made-up, but if we’ve learned anything from the presidential campaign, it’s that we’re now living in a media looking glass where things that aren’t true take on the ring of reality, even after they’ve been debunked.

Will the tabloid stories that have swirled around Pitt for the last six months influence whether or not audiences go to see “Allied”? The rumors of an on-set liaison, however spurious, might actually be an audience lure, in that Liz-and-Dick-on-the-set-of-“Cleopatra” way. But the more vital issue is that Pitt, who often shuns love stories, is now attempting to market himself as a romantic star. Is the audience of women who will seek him out in that kind of role going to be as big, right now, as it would have been a year ago, before the coverage of his divorce splattered him with mud?

My unscientific answer is: maybe not. Then again, however much the success of “Allied” is influenced by the perception of that other, gossip-driven Brad Pitt movie, the real question is this: For those who buy a ticket to “Allied,” will their awareness of tabloid scandal influence how they view Pitt as a fantasy figure? Movies, after all, are illusions that convince us, in a spectacular and nearly counterintuitive way, that they’re real. We don’t just want to be swept away — we want to believe.

Pitt is a superb actor (one of my favorites, in fact), but the question for audiences is whether they can completely give themselves over to experiencing him in a role that is now competing with the role of his life.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 5

Leave a Reply

5 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. harry georgatos says:

    Pitt is simply not a good actor. The two standout performances from this limited actor has been TWELVE MONKEYS and FIGHT CLUB. That’s it! Every single other performance is that of a pretty boy who is approaching his used by time!

  2. Betsy foodie says:

    He’s terrible in films where he has to show emotion. Better when he can just eat food. If anything the gossip should have helped his movie because his Pr team has made sure to put out the poor Brad and evil Angelina narratvie that has been helping him for 11 or so years now.

    I think what hurt this film is his weird botoxed/cgi face and bad acting in the trailer.

  3. Ib says:

    Pitt’s movies aren’t often huge box office hits, but it has nothing to do with his personal life being a tabloid fixture. He’s been a tabloid fixture since he has been famous. If audiences really cared about that sort of thing, they would have turned their backs on him when he left Aniston for Jolie.

    No, the real reason his movies don’t make a lot of money is because he usually chooses dark, artsy films over blockbuster action movies (Troy, Mr. and Mrs. Smith and World War Z among the exceptions, which also happen to be his box-office hits). In that regard, he’s basically the polar opposite of the Tom Cruises and RDJs of the world. It’s a shame, because he has made some amazing masterpieces (Fight Club, The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford) that go virtually unnoticed at the box office and don’t seem to be appreciated until after the fact.

    And I also don’t think Pitt took Allied because it’s a romance. I think he took the part because it’s a WWII movie with a thoroughly downbeat ending.

  4. Moana says:

    As a former fan of him am personally very happy brad pitt affair came to an end not because of his cheating but his cruel treatment of Jennifer Aniston was unforgivable and years later his numerous attacks on her for no reason which as classy as she ignored him. Am sure she is sitting on some truth that could have destroyed him but she is kind and a sweetheart to have done that. Now his mistress is doing all that without jennifer raising a figure. You reap what you sow and hope brangelina continue to suffer the same pain they caused an innocent woman 12yrs ago.

    As for his latest bomb movie Allied don’t make “excuses” for him because his movies have been bombing for some time now. His performance was panned by critics as wooden, downsides, awful and the movie was slow and boring. So I don’t think him getting dumped, drunk , messy divorce has anything to do with this movie not doing well.

  5. Margie Lazou says:

    I usually refrain from quoting religious texts, but I think, in this case the “whoever is sinless shall cast the first stone” fits rather well. Actors are people, and despite their fame and fortune (or maybe enlarged by them) they still have their flaws. Nobody’s perfect. And everyone is entitled to their privacy, personal life and space, and the right to fuck up as gloriously as any. So, no, personally, I’ll judge the movie and the actors as I always have done – by how they appear on screen.

More Voices News from Variety

Loading