‘Making a Murderer’ Defendants Still Feeling Impact From Series

'Making a Murderer' defendants still feeling
Courtesy of Netflix

Netflix’s “Making a Murderer” swept up audiences with the story of Steven Avery, who had previously been exonerated for a crime after spending 18 years in prison, and Brendan Dassey, his nephew, as murder suspects in the killing of Teresa Halbach in 2005. The series brought to the fore questions about the tactics used by law enforcement and the prosecution. But the impact of the Netflix series went beyond stunning audiences and generating a White House petition for the release of Avery.

Steven Drizin, who works at the Center on Wrongful Convictions of Youth at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, is Dassey’s current lawyer. [Dassey was convicted of murder, among other charges, in 2007 when he was 17.] Drizin believes he knows why the series has struck a chord with millions of viewers. “I think the series has really opened people’s eyes to just how overzealous law enforcement can be in their efforts to gain a conviction at all costs,” he says.

For Dassey’s case in particular, Drizin says, it “has raised serious concerns about how police officers interrogate suspects, particularly youthful suspects.” The series has also served to “educate people about the problem of false and coerced confessions.” Not only that, but it has also called into question whether “police officers and prosecutors in the zeal to win cases are willing to trample on suspects’ basic constitutional rights, even to go so far as to plant evidence.”

On the flipside, while the series has created clouded perspectives about law enforcement, it has uplifted certain areas of the legal system.

“For the first time, in my lifetime, two of the heroes are criminal defense attorneys — [Steven Avery co-counsels] Dean Strang and Jerry Buting. They are being praised for fighting like hell on behalf of a client who was accused of committing the most awful of crimes,” Drizin says. “You don’t see defense attorneys getting that kind of acclaim very often.”

Drizin thinks that the overall impact of the series has created a chance for Dassey.

“The fact that so many people are outraged by what they saw gives me hope that this could be a real opportunity for change,” says Drizin.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 3

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Penelope Muldoon-Middis says:

    Whatever happened to the concept for LE to serve & protect?
    It’s difficult to believe this happened to Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey.
    $36million lawsuit clearly is the catalyst to the framing.
    I have great faith in Kathleen Zellner’s dedication in investigating & freedom fighting for the wrongfully convicted.

  2. johnnymac says:

    Bottom line … NEVER EVER trust the police … they are NOT your friend and they are not on your side & will NOT go easy on you if you confess to something you didn’t do … simply refuse to answer any questions under ny circumstancess without an attorney present.

More TV News from Variety